From: Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Cc: richard.guenther@gmail.com, uecker@tugraz.at,
siddhesh@gotplt.org, keescook@chromium.org,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:04:22 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74e0a96c-fa13-7fae-85e1-6e9efb28f4e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240419184317.2138890-2-qing.zhao@oracle.com>
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, Qing Zhao wrote:
> +The size of the union is as if the flexiable array member were omitted
> +except that it may have more trailing padding than the omission would imply.
"trailing padding" is more a concept for structures than for unions (where
padding depends on which union member is active). But I suppose it's
still true that the union can be larger than without the flexible member,
because of alignment considerations.
union u { char c; int a[]; };
needs to be sufficiently aligned for int, which means the size is a
multiple of the size of int, whereas if the flexible array member weren't
present, the size could be 1 byte.
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 18:43 [RFC][PATCH v1 0/4] Allow flexible array members in unions and alone in structures [PR53548] Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation change Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 20:54 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-22 13:28 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-23 18:04 ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2024-04-23 18:21 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-23 19:03 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-23 19:21 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 2/4] C and C++ FE changes to support flexible array members in unions and alone in structures Qing Zhao
2024-04-23 19:51 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-23 19:58 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 3/4] Add testing cases for " Qing Zhao
2024-04-23 18:53 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-23 19:30 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 18:43 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 4/4] Adjust testcases for flexible array member in union and alone in structure extension Qing Zhao
2024-04-19 21:55 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 0/4] Allow flexible array members in unions and alone in structures [PR53548] Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74e0a96c-fa13-7fae-85e1-6e9efb28f4e@redhat.com \
--to=josmyers@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).