public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Botcazou <botcazou@adacore.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:06:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3194055.aeNJFYEL58@fomalhaut> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1315 bytes --]

Hi,

if you compile the attached testcase with -O2 -fno-inline -Wall, you get:

In function 'process_array3':
cc1: warning: 'process_array4' accessing 4 bytes in a region of size 3 [-
Wstringop-overflow=]
cc1: note: referencing argument 1 of type 'char[4]'
t.c:6:6: note: in a call to function 'process_array4'
    6 | void process_array4 (char a[4], int n)
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: warning: 'process_array4' accessing 4 bytes in a region of size 3 [-
Wstringop-overflow=]
cc1: note: referencing argument 1 of type 'char[4]'
t.c:6:6: note: in a call to function 'process_array4'

That's because the ICF IPA pass has identified the two functions and turned 
process_array3 into a wrapper of process_array4.  This looks sensible to me 
given that the only difference between them is an "access" attribute on their 
type describing the access size of the parameter and the "access" attribute 
does not affect type identity (struct attribute_spec.affects_type_identity).

Hence the proposed fix, tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mainline?


2022-10-13  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@adacore.com>

	* gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc (pass_waccess::check_call): Return
	early for calls made from thunks.


2022-10-13  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@adacore.com>

	* gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-89.c: New test.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

[-- Attachment #2: p.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 862 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
index 04aa849a4b1..59a70530600 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
@@ -4291,14 +4291,18 @@ pass_waccess::check_pointer_uses (gimple *stmt, tree ptr,
 void
 pass_waccess::check_call (gcall *stmt)
 {
-  if (gimple_call_builtin_p (stmt, BUILT_IN_NORMAL))
-    check_builtin (stmt);
+  /* Skip special calls generated by the compiler.  */
+  if (gimple_call_from_thunk_p (stmt))
+    return;
 
   /* .ASAN_MARK doesn't access any vars, only modifies shadow memory.  */
   if (gimple_call_internal_p (stmt)
       && gimple_call_internal_fn (stmt) == IFN_ASAN_MARK)
     return;
 
+  if (gimple_call_builtin_p (stmt, BUILT_IN_NORMAL))
+    check_builtin (stmt);
+
   if (!m_early_checks_p)
     if (tree callee = gimple_call_fndecl (stmt))
       {

[-- Attachment #3: Wstringop-overflow-89.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 286 bytes --]

/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-inline -Wall" } */

extern void process (char);

void process_array4 (char a[4], int n)
{
  for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
    process (a[i]);
}

void process_array3 (char a[3], int n)
{
  for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
    process (a[i]);
}

             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-13 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-13 12:06 Eric Botcazou [this message]
2022-10-13 22:31 ` Jeff Law
2022-10-13 22:53   ` Eric Botcazou
2022-10-14  6:12     ` Richard Biener
2022-10-14 10:27       ` Martin Liška
2022-10-14 11:59         ` Martin Jambor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3194055.aeNJFYEL58@fomalhaut \
    --to=botcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).