public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Relax the -march string for accept any order
@ 2024-01-08 13:47 Kito Cheng
  2024-01-08 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] RISC-V: Extract part parsing base ISA logic into a standalone function [NFC] Kito Cheng
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Kito Cheng @ 2024-01-08 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches, kito.cheng, jim.wilson.gcc, palmer, andrew,
	jeffreyalaw, christoph.muellner


Do you know how to build a ISA string with following extension?
- g
- c
- zba
- zbs
- svnapot
- zve64d
- zvl128b

Don't trial and error with your gcc and don't read RISC-V ISA spec! OK, I believe it's impossible for most people, even I work for RISC-V so many years, I remember most of the rule of the the canonical order, it's still hard to order that right in short time...

So I think it's time to relax that for the -march string inputs, since we have so many extension today, but we still keep the canonicalization within the compiler, because we need that to handle multi-lib and also it's easier to compare different ISA string.

This patch break into serveral part:
1) Small refactor patch
2) Change the way of parsing ISA string.
3) Remove unused functions
4) Update test cases
5) Update document





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Relax the -march string for accept any order
@ 2024-01-19  9:36 juzhe.zhong
  2024-01-19  9:39 ` Kito Cheng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: juzhe.zhong @ 2024-01-19  9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Kito.cheng, kito.cheng, jeffreyalaw, Robin Dapp

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3881 bytes --]

Hi, kito.

I found these following regression:

FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O0   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O1   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O1  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O2   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O2  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O3 -g   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -Os   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c   -Os  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O0   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O1   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O1  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O2   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O2  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O3 -g   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -Os   at line 7 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c   -Os  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O0   at line 8 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O1   at line 8 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O1  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O2   at line 8 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O2  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none   at line 8 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects   at line 8 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O3 -g   at line 8 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -Os   at line 8 (test for errors, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c   -Os  (test for excess errors)

Could you take a look at it ?
I am not sure whether they are caused by this patch.  But I find only this patch looks related.


juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-19  9:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-08 13:47 [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Relax the -march string for accept any order Kito Cheng
2024-01-08 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] RISC-V: Extract part parsing base ISA logic into a standalone function [NFC] Kito Cheng
2024-01-08 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] RISC-V: Relax the -march string for accept any order Kito Cheng
2024-01-08 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] RISC-V: Remove unused function in riscv_subset_list [NFC] Kito Cheng
2024-01-08 13:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] RISC-V: Update testsuite due to -march string relaxation Kito Cheng
2024-01-08 13:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Document the syntax of -march Kito Cheng
2024-01-09 18:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Relax the -march string for accept any order Jeff Law
2024-01-10  0:58   ` Kito Cheng
2024-01-10  1:38     ` Fangrui Song
2024-01-16 14:33     ` Jeff Law
2024-01-19  7:20       ` Kito Cheng
2024-01-19  9:36 juzhe.zhong
2024-01-19  9:39 ` Kito Cheng

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).