public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: LIU Hao <lh_mouse@126.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Adding a new thread model to GCC
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 09:23:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5821cc8835d5db2f185df37c5c31865015e6d350.camel@xry111.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a23ad853-2cc7-63af-99e6-362ade66fcd8@126.com>

On Tue, 2022-10-04 at 21:45 +0800, LIU Hao wrote:
> 在 2022-10-04 21:13, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> > 
> > In GCC development we usually include the configure regeneration in the
> > patch because the scripts are also version controlled.
> > 
> 
> There is a reason for not doing that: Generated contents can't be reviewed.
> 
> In mingw-w64 we do the opposite: The person who commits a patch is responsible for update configure, 
> Makefile.in, etc. The patch itself doesn't include generated contents.

The reviewer can simply skip the changes in configure.  But including
the configure allows the potential testers to test the change without
autoconf-2.69 installed.

Maybe we can make a compromise: put the line "configure: Regenerate." in
the ChangeLog, but do not actually include the change.  Now if the
committer forgot to regenerate it, the git hook will reject the push
immediately.

(Just my 2 cents.)
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-01 18:34 LIU Hao
2022-10-01 20:02 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-10-02 12:54   ` LIU Hao
2022-10-03  5:03     ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-10-04  8:06       ` LIU Hao
2022-10-04 19:45         ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-10-04 12:44       ` LIU Hao
2022-10-04 13:13         ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-10-04 13:45           ` LIU Hao
2022-10-05  1:23             ` Xi Ruoyao [this message]
2022-10-10 15:56         ` LIU Hao
2022-10-11 13:22           ` LIU Hao
2022-10-14  9:39             ` Jonathan Yong
2022-10-19 13:55               ` Jonathan Yong
2022-10-19 19:53                 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-10-20  1:25                   ` LIU Hao
2022-10-21  9:58 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-10-21 10:09   ` i.nixman
2022-10-21 10:48     ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-10-21 10:55       ` i.nixman
2022-10-21 11:36     ` LIU Hao
2022-10-21 11:54       ` i.nixman
2022-10-21 12:19         ` LIU Hao
2022-10-21 12:34           ` i.nixman
2022-10-24  3:40             ` LIU Hao
2022-10-24 20:50               ` Jacek Caban
2022-10-21 12:13       ` Jacek Caban
2022-10-21 12:29         ` LIU Hao
2022-10-21 12:40           ` Jacek Caban
2022-10-21 11:44   ` Eric Botcazou
2022-10-21 11:55     ` i.nixman
2022-10-21 12:30       ` Jacek Caban
2022-10-23  0:36         ` NightStrike
2022-10-24  6:53     ` i.nixman
2022-10-24  8:15       ` Eric Botcazou
2022-10-24  8:20         ` i.nixman
2022-10-31  9:18       ` Eric Botcazou
2022-10-31 15:22         ` i.nixman
2022-12-18 11:14           ` Jonathan Yong
2022-11-01  5:22         ` i.nixman
2022-11-01  9:09           ` Eric Botcazou
2022-11-02 12:05             ` i.nixman
2022-11-02 21:27               ` Eric Botcazou
2022-11-02 21:40                 ` i.nixman
2022-12-16 17:18         ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-12-16 19:20           ` Eric Botcazou
2022-12-22 12:21             ` Jonathan Yong
2022-12-22 12:28               ` i.nixman
2022-12-23 23:59                 ` Jonathan Yong
2022-12-24  5:58                   ` NightStrike
2022-12-24  6:27                     ` i.nixman
2022-12-24 13:50                     ` i.nixman
2022-12-24 15:42                       ` i.nixman
2022-12-24 15:57                         ` i.nixman
2022-12-24 21:22                           ` i.nixman
2022-12-25  1:10                             ` Jonathan Yong
2023-01-09 21:56                             ` Eric Botcazou
2022-12-24  6:22                   ` i.nixman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5821cc8835d5db2f185df37c5c31865015e6d350.camel@xry111.site \
    --to=xry111@xry111.site \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=lh_mouse@126.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).