From: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: segher@kernel.crashing.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com, linkw@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]rs6000: NFC use sext_hwi to replace ((v&0xf..f)^0x80..0) - 0x80..0
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:10:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81db0995-8ba5-766c-1e0e-67d3d47c40ce@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb820a8d-da66-d933-59ee-2d3086d42cdc@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1822 bytes --]
Hi Kewen,
在 12/1/22 2:11 PM, Kewen.Lin 写道:
> on 2022/12/1 13:35, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> Hi Kewen,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick and insight review!
>>
>> 在 12/1/22 1:17 PM, Kewen.Lin 写道:
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> on 2022/12/1 09:36, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This patch just uses sext_hwi to replace the expression like:
>>>> ((value & 0xf..f) ^ 0x80..0) - 0x80..0 for rs6000.cc and rs6000.md.
>>>>
>>>> Bootstrap & regtest pass on ppc64{,le}.
>>>> Is this ok for trunk?
>>>
>>> You didn't say it clearly but I guessed you have grepped in the whole
>>> config/rs6000 directory, right? I noticed there are still two places
>>> using this kind of expression in function constant_generates_xxspltiw,
>>> but I assumed it's intentional as their types are not HOST_WIDE_INT.
>>>
>>> gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc: short sign_h_word = ((h_word & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
>>> gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc: int sign_word = ((word & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
>>>
>>> If so, could you state it clearly in commit log like "with type
>>> signed/unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT" or similar?
>>>
>> Good question!
>>
>> And as you said sext_hwi is more for "signed/unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT".
>> For these two places, it seems sext_hwi is not needed actually!
>> And I did see why these expressions are used, may be just an assignment
>> is ok.
>
> ah, I see. I agree using the assignment is quite enough. Could you
> please also simplify them together? Since they are with the form
> "((value & 0xf..f) ^ 0x80..0) - 0x80..0" too, and can be refactored
> in a better way. Thanks!
Sure, I believe just "short sign_h_word = vsx_const->half_words[0];"
should be correct :-), and included in the updated patch.
Updated patch is attached, bootstrap®test is on going.
BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
[-- Attachment #2: 0002-NFC-use-sext_hwi-to-replace-v-0xf.f-0x80.0-0x80.0.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9561 bytes --]
From 8aa8e1234b6ec34473434951a3a6177253aac770 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:13:37 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2]rs6000: update ((v&0xf..f)^0x80..0) - 0x80..0 with code: like sext_hwi
This patch just replaces the expression like:
((value & 0xf..f) ^ 0x80..0) - 0x80..0 to better code(e.g. sext_hwi) for
rs6000.cc, rs6000.md and predicates.md (files under rs6000/).
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rs6000/predicates.md: Use sext_hwi.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (num_insns_constant_gpr): Likewise.
(darwin_rs6000_legitimate_lo_sum_const_p): Likewise.
(mem_operand_gpr): Likewise.
(mem_operand_ds_form): Likewise.
(rs6000_legitimize_address): Likewise.
(rs6000_emit_set_const): Likewise.
(rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Likewise.
(print_operand): Likewise.
(constant_generates_xxspltiw): Remove unnecessary expressions.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md: Use sext_hwi.
---
gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md | 2 +-
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 36 ++++++++++++++-------------------
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md | 10 ++++-----
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
index b1fcc69bb60..a1764018545 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ (define_predicate "easy_vector_constant_add_self"
return 0;
elt = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_NUNITS (mode) - 1 : 0;
val = const_vector_elt_as_int (op, elt);
- val = ((val & 0xff) ^ 0x80) - 0x80;
+ val = sext_hwi (val, 8);
return EASY_VECTOR_15_ADD_SELF (val);
})
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
index 5efe9b22d8b..dff9a0d8835 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
@@ -6021,7 +6021,7 @@ num_insns_constant_gpr (HOST_WIDE_INT value)
else if (TARGET_POWERPC64)
{
- HOST_WIDE_INT low = ((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
+ HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (value, 32);
HOST_WIDE_INT high = value >> 31;
if (high == 0 || high == -1)
@@ -8456,7 +8456,7 @@ darwin_rs6000_legitimate_lo_sum_const_p (rtx x, machine_mode mode)
}
/* We only care if the access(es) would cause a change to the high part. */
- offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+ offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
}
@@ -8522,7 +8522,7 @@ mem_operand_gpr (rtx op, machine_mode mode)
if (GET_CODE (addr) == LO_SUM)
/* For lo_sum addresses, we must allow any offset except one that
causes a wrap, so test only the low 16 bits. */
- offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+ offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
}
@@ -8562,7 +8562,7 @@ mem_operand_ds_form (rtx op, machine_mode mode)
if (GET_CODE (addr) == LO_SUM)
/* For lo_sum addresses, we must allow any offset except one that
causes a wrap, so test only the low 16 bits. */
- offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+ offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
}
@@ -9136,7 +9136,7 @@ rs6000_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx oldx ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
{
HOST_WIDE_INT high_int, low_int;
rtx sum;
- low_int = ((INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+ low_int = sext_hwi (INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)), 16);
if (low_int >= 0x8000 - extra)
low_int = 0;
high_int = INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) - low_int;
@@ -10203,7 +10203,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_const (rtx dest, rtx source)
lo = operand_subword_force (dest, WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN != 0,
DImode);
emit_move_insn (hi, GEN_INT (c >> 32));
- c = ((c & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
+ c = sext_hwi (c, 32);
emit_move_insn (lo, GEN_INT (c));
}
else
@@ -10242,7 +10242,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
if ((ud4 == 0xffff && ud3 == 0xffff && ud2 == 0xffff && (ud1 & 0x8000))
|| (ud4 == 0 && ud3 == 0 && ud2 == 0 && ! (ud1 & 0x8000)))
- emit_move_insn (dest, GEN_INT ((ud1 ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000));
+ emit_move_insn (dest, GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud1, 16)));
else if ((ud4 == 0xffff && ud3 == 0xffff && (ud2 & 0x8000))
|| (ud4 == 0 && ud3 == 0 && ! (ud2 & 0x8000)))
@@ -10250,7 +10250,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
emit_move_insn (ud1 != 0 ? copy_rtx (temp) : dest,
- GEN_INT (((ud2 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
+ GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud2 << 16, 32)));
if (ud1 != 0)
emit_move_insn (dest,
gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
@@ -10261,8 +10261,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
gcc_assert (ud2 & 0x8000);
- emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
- GEN_INT (((ud2 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
+ emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud2 << 16, 32)));
if (ud1 != 0)
emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
@@ -10273,7 +10272,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
{
temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
HOST_WIDE_INT num = (ud2 << 16) | ud1;
- rs6000_emit_set_long_const (temp, (num ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
+ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (temp, sext_hwi (num, 32));
rtx one = gen_rtx_AND (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (0xffffffff));
rtx two = gen_rtx_ASHIFT (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (32));
emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, one, two));
@@ -10283,8 +10282,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
{
temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
- emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
- GEN_INT (((ud3 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
+ emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud3 << 16, 32)));
if (ud2 != 0)
emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
@@ -10336,8 +10334,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
{
temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
- emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
- GEN_INT (((ud4 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
+ emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud4 << 16, 32)));
if (ud3 != 0)
emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
@@ -14167,8 +14164,7 @@ print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int code)
/* If constant, low-order 16 bits of constant, signed. Otherwise, write
normally. */
if (INT_P (x))
- fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC,
- ((INTVAL (x) & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000);
+ fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, sext_hwi (INTVAL (x), 16));
else
print_operand (file, x, 0);
return;
@@ -28719,14 +28715,12 @@ constant_generates_xxspltiw (vec_const_128bit_type *vsx_const)
/* See if we can use VSPLTISH or VSPLTISW. */
if (vsx_const->all_half_words_same)
{
- unsigned short h_word = vsx_const->half_words[0];
- short sign_h_word = ((h_word & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+ short sign_h_word = vsx_const->half_words[0];
if (EASY_VECTOR_15 (sign_h_word))
return 0;
}
- unsigned int word = vsx_const->words[0];
- int sign_word = ((word & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
+ int sign_word = vsx_const->words[0];
if (EASY_VECTOR_15 (sign_word))
return 0;
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
index 3bae303086b..4bd1dfd3da9 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
@@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ (define_expand "add<mode>3"
}
HOST_WIDE_INT val = INTVAL (operands[2]);
- HOST_WIDE_INT low = ((val & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+ HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (val, 16);
HOST_WIDE_INT rest = trunc_int_for_mode (val - low, <MODE>mode);
if (<MODE>mode == DImode && !satisfies_constraint_L (GEN_INT (rest)))
@@ -1930,7 +1930,7 @@ (define_split
(set (match_dup 0) (plus:GPR (match_dup 0) (match_dup 4)))]
{
HOST_WIDE_INT val = INTVAL (operands[2]);
- HOST_WIDE_INT low = ((val & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+ HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (val, 16);
HOST_WIDE_INT rest = trunc_int_for_mode (val - low, <MODE>mode);
operands[4] = GEN_INT (low);
@@ -8213,7 +8213,7 @@ (define_split
operands[2] = operand_subword (operands[0], endian, 0, <MODE>mode);
operands[3] = operand_subword (operands[0], 1 - endian, 0, <MODE>mode);
operands[4] = GEN_INT (value >> 32);
- operands[1] = GEN_INT (((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
+ operands[1] = GEN_INT (sext_hwi (value, 32));
})
(define_split
@@ -9577,7 +9577,7 @@ (define_split
operands[3] = operand_subword_force (operands[0], WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN != 0,
DImode);
operands[4] = GEN_INT (value >> 32);
- operands[1] = GEN_INT (((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
+ operands[1] = GEN_INT (sext_hwi (value, 32));
})
(define_split
@@ -12425,7 +12425,7 @@ (define_peephole2
SImode,
operands[1], operands[2]);
HOST_WIDE_INT c = INTVAL (cnst);
- HOST_WIDE_INT sextc = ((c & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+ HOST_WIDE_INT sextc = sext_hwi (c, 16);
HOST_WIDE_INT xorv = c ^ sextc;
operands[9] = GEN_INT (xorv);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-01 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 1:36 [PATCH 1/3]rs6000: NFC use more readable pattern to clean high 32 bits Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 1:36 ` [PATCH 2/3]rs6000: NFC use sext_hwi to replace ((v&0xf..f)^0x80..0) - 0x80..0 Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 5:17 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01 5:30 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01 6:32 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 5:35 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 6:11 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01 7:10 ` Jiufu Guo [this message]
2022-12-01 12:16 ` guojiufu
2022-12-02 8:56 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-05 6:11 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-09 1:51 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 1:36 ` [PATCH 3/3]rs6000: NFC no need copy_rtx in rs6000_emit_set_long_const and rs6000_emit_set_const Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 3:31 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01 4:52 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-09 12:25 ` Jiufu Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81db0995-8ba5-766c-1e0e-67d3d47c40ce@linux.ibm.com \
--to=guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).