public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: segher@kernel.crashing.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com, linkw@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]rs6000: NFC use sext_hwi to replace ((v&0xf..f)^0x80..0) - 0x80..0
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:10:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81db0995-8ba5-766c-1e0e-67d3d47c40ce@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb820a8d-da66-d933-59ee-2d3086d42cdc@linux.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1822 bytes --]

Hi Kewen,

在 12/1/22 2:11 PM, Kewen.Lin 写道:
> on 2022/12/1 13:35, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> Hi Kewen,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick and insight review!
>>
>> 在 12/1/22 1:17 PM, Kewen.Lin 写道:
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> on 2022/12/1 09:36, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This patch just uses sext_hwi to replace the expression like:
>>>> ((value & 0xf..f) ^ 0x80..0) - 0x80..0 for rs6000.cc and rs6000.md.
>>>>
>>>> Bootstrap & regtest pass on ppc64{,le}.
>>>> Is this ok for trunk? 
>>>
>>> You didn't say it clearly but I guessed you have grepped in the whole
>>> config/rs6000 directory, right?  I noticed there are still two places
>>> using this kind of expression in function constant_generates_xxspltiw,
>>> but I assumed it's intentional as their types are not HOST_WIDE_INT.
>>>
>>> gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:      short sign_h_word = ((h_word & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
>>> gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:  int sign_word = ((word & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
>>>
>>> If so, could you state it clearly in commit log like "with type
>>> signed/unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT" or similar?
>>>
>> Good question!
>>
>> And as you said sext_hwi is more for "signed/unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT".
>> For these two places, it seems sext_hwi is not needed actually!
>> And I did see why these expressions are used, may be just an assignment
>> is ok.
> 
> ah, I see.  I agree using the assignment is quite enough.  Could you
> please also simplify them together?  Since they are with the form 
> "((value & 0xf..f) ^ 0x80..0) - 0x80..0" too, and can be refactored
> in a better way.  Thanks!

Sure, I believe just "short sign_h_word = vsx_const->half_words[0];"
should be correct :-), and included in the updated patch.

Updated patch is attached,  bootstrap&regtest is on going.


BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)

> 
> BR,
> Kewen
> 

[-- Attachment #2: 0002-NFC-use-sext_hwi-to-replace-v-0xf.f-0x80.0-0x80.0.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9561 bytes --]

From 8aa8e1234b6ec34473434951a3a6177253aac770 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:13:37 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/2]rs6000: update ((v&0xf..f)^0x80..0) - 0x80..0 with code: like sext_hwi

This patch just replaces the expression like: 
((value & 0xf..f) ^ 0x80..0) - 0x80..0 to better code(e.g. sext_hwi) for
rs6000.cc, rs6000.md and predicates.md (files under rs6000/).

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/rs6000/predicates.md: Use sext_hwi.
	* config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (num_insns_constant_gpr): Likewise.
	(darwin_rs6000_legitimate_lo_sum_const_p): Likewise.
	(mem_operand_gpr): Likewise.
	(mem_operand_ds_form): Likewise.
	(rs6000_legitimize_address): Likewise.
	(rs6000_emit_set_const): Likewise.
	(rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Likewise.
	(print_operand): Likewise.
	(constant_generates_xxspltiw): Remove unnecessary expressions.
	* config/rs6000/rs6000.md: Use sext_hwi.

---
 gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md |  2 +-
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc     | 36 ++++++++++++++-------------------
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md     | 10 ++++-----
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
index b1fcc69bb60..a1764018545 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ (define_predicate "easy_vector_constant_add_self"
     return 0;
   elt = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_NUNITS (mode) - 1 : 0;
   val = const_vector_elt_as_int (op, elt);
-  val = ((val & 0xff) ^ 0x80) - 0x80;
+  val = sext_hwi (val, 8);
   return EASY_VECTOR_15_ADD_SELF (val);
 })
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
index 5efe9b22d8b..dff9a0d8835 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
@@ -6021,7 +6021,7 @@ num_insns_constant_gpr (HOST_WIDE_INT value)
 
   else if (TARGET_POWERPC64)
     {
-      HOST_WIDE_INT low  = ((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
+      HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (value, 32);
       HOST_WIDE_INT high = value >> 31;
 
       if (high == 0 || high == -1)
@@ -8456,7 +8456,7 @@ darwin_rs6000_legitimate_lo_sum_const_p (rtx x, machine_mode mode)
     }
 
   /* We only care if the access(es) would cause a change to the high part.  */
-  offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+  offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
   return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
 }
 
@@ -8522,7 +8522,7 @@ mem_operand_gpr (rtx op, machine_mode mode)
   if (GET_CODE (addr) == LO_SUM)
     /* For lo_sum addresses, we must allow any offset except one that
        causes a wrap, so test only the low 16 bits.  */
-    offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+    offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
 
   return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
 }
@@ -8562,7 +8562,7 @@ mem_operand_ds_form (rtx op, machine_mode mode)
   if (GET_CODE (addr) == LO_SUM)
     /* For lo_sum addresses, we must allow any offset except one that
        causes a wrap, so test only the low 16 bits.  */
-    offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+    offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
 
   return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
 }
@@ -9136,7 +9136,7 @@ rs6000_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx oldx ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
     {
       HOST_WIDE_INT high_int, low_int;
       rtx sum;
-      low_int = ((INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+      low_int = sext_hwi (INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)), 16);
       if (low_int >= 0x8000 - extra)
 	low_int = 0;
       high_int = INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) - low_int;
@@ -10203,7 +10203,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_const (rtx dest, rtx source)
 	  lo = operand_subword_force (dest, WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN != 0,
 				      DImode);
 	  emit_move_insn (hi, GEN_INT (c >> 32));
-	  c = ((c & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
+	  c = sext_hwi (c, 32);
 	  emit_move_insn (lo, GEN_INT (c));
 	}
       else
@@ -10242,7 +10242,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
 
   if ((ud4 == 0xffff && ud3 == 0xffff && ud2 == 0xffff && (ud1 & 0x8000))
       || (ud4 == 0 && ud3 == 0 && ud2 == 0 && ! (ud1 & 0x8000)))
-    emit_move_insn (dest, GEN_INT ((ud1 ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000));
+    emit_move_insn (dest, GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud1, 16)));
 
   else if ((ud4 == 0xffff && ud3 == 0xffff && (ud2 & 0x8000))
 	   || (ud4 == 0 && ud3 == 0 && ! (ud2 & 0x8000)))
@@ -10250,7 +10250,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
       temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
 
       emit_move_insn (ud1 != 0 ? copy_rtx (temp) : dest,
-		      GEN_INT (((ud2 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
+		      GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud2 << 16, 32)));
       if (ud1 != 0)
 	emit_move_insn (dest,
 			gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
@@ -10261,8 +10261,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
       temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
 
       gcc_assert (ud2 & 0x8000);
-      emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
-		      GEN_INT (((ud2 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
+      emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud2 << 16, 32)));
       if (ud1 != 0)
 	emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
 			gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
@@ -10273,7 +10272,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
     {
       temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
       HOST_WIDE_INT num = (ud2 << 16) | ud1;
-      rs6000_emit_set_long_const (temp, (num ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
+      rs6000_emit_set_long_const (temp, sext_hwi (num, 32));
       rtx one = gen_rtx_AND (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (0xffffffff));
       rtx two = gen_rtx_ASHIFT (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (32));
       emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, one, two));
@@ -10283,8 +10282,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
     {
       temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
 
-      emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
-		      GEN_INT (((ud3 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
+      emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud3 << 16, 32)));
       if (ud2 != 0)
 	emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
 			gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
@@ -10336,8 +10334,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
     {
       temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
 
-      emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
-		      GEN_INT (((ud4 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
+      emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud4 << 16, 32)));
       if (ud3 != 0)
 	emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
 			gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
@@ -14167,8 +14164,7 @@ print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int code)
       /* If constant, low-order 16 bits of constant, signed.  Otherwise, write
 	 normally.  */
       if (INT_P (x))
-	fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC,
-		 ((INTVAL (x) & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000);
+	fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, sext_hwi (INTVAL (x), 16));
       else
 	print_operand (file, x, 0);
       return;
@@ -28719,14 +28715,12 @@ constant_generates_xxspltiw (vec_const_128bit_type *vsx_const)
   /* See if we can use VSPLTISH or VSPLTISW.  */
   if (vsx_const->all_half_words_same)
     {
-      unsigned short h_word = vsx_const->half_words[0];
-      short sign_h_word = ((h_word & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+      short sign_h_word = vsx_const->half_words[0];
       if (EASY_VECTOR_15 (sign_h_word))
 	return 0;
     }
 
-  unsigned int word = vsx_const->words[0];
-  int sign_word = ((word & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
+  int sign_word = vsx_const->words[0];
   if (EASY_VECTOR_15 (sign_word))
     return 0;
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
index 3bae303086b..4bd1dfd3da9 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
@@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ (define_expand "add<mode>3"
 	}
 
       HOST_WIDE_INT val = INTVAL (operands[2]);
-      HOST_WIDE_INT low = ((val & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+      HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (val, 16);
       HOST_WIDE_INT rest = trunc_int_for_mode (val - low, <MODE>mode);
 
       if (<MODE>mode == DImode && !satisfies_constraint_L (GEN_INT (rest)))
@@ -1930,7 +1930,7 @@ (define_split
    (set (match_dup 0) (plus:GPR (match_dup 0) (match_dup 4)))]
 {
   HOST_WIDE_INT val = INTVAL (operands[2]);
-  HOST_WIDE_INT low = ((val & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+  HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (val, 16);
   HOST_WIDE_INT rest = trunc_int_for_mode (val - low, <MODE>mode);
 
   operands[4] = GEN_INT (low);
@@ -8213,7 +8213,7 @@ (define_split
   operands[2] = operand_subword (operands[0], endian, 0, <MODE>mode);
   operands[3] = operand_subword (operands[0], 1 - endian, 0, <MODE>mode);
   operands[4] = GEN_INT (value >> 32);
-  operands[1] = GEN_INT (((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
+  operands[1] = GEN_INT (sext_hwi (value, 32));
 })
 
 (define_split
@@ -9577,7 +9577,7 @@ (define_split
   operands[3] = operand_subword_force (operands[0], WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN != 0,
 				       DImode);
   operands[4] = GEN_INT (value >> 32);
-  operands[1] = GEN_INT (((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
+  operands[1] = GEN_INT (sext_hwi (value, 32));
 })
 
 (define_split
@@ -12425,7 +12425,7 @@ (define_peephole2
 					      SImode,
 					      operands[1], operands[2]);
   HOST_WIDE_INT c = INTVAL (cnst);
-  HOST_WIDE_INT sextc = ((c & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
+  HOST_WIDE_INT sextc = sext_hwi (c, 16);
   HOST_WIDE_INT xorv = c ^ sextc;
 
   operands[9] = GEN_INT (xorv);
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-01  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-01  1:36 [PATCH 1/3]rs6000: NFC use more readable pattern to clean high 32 bits Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01  1:36 ` [PATCH 2/3]rs6000: NFC use sext_hwi to replace ((v&0xf..f)^0x80..0) - 0x80..0 Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01  5:17   ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01  5:30     ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01  6:32       ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01  5:35     ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01  6:11       ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01  7:10         ` Jiufu Guo [this message]
2022-12-01 12:16           ` guojiufu
2022-12-02  8:56             ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-05  6:11               ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-09  1:51                 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01  1:36 ` [PATCH 3/3]rs6000: NFC no need copy_rtx in rs6000_emit_set_long_const and rs6000_emit_set_const Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01  3:31   ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01  4:52     ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-09 12:25       ` Jiufu Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=81db0995-8ba5-766c-1e0e-67d3d47c40ce@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linkw@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).