From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: segher@kernel.crashing.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com, linkw@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]rs6000: NFC use sext_hwi to replace ((v&0xf..f)^0x80..0) - 0x80..0
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 13:17:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94338e4c-baf4-ec09-68a7-064a23c79327@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221201013619.196004-2-guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Jeff,
on 2022/12/1 09:36, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch just uses sext_hwi to replace the expression like:
> ((value & 0xf..f) ^ 0x80..0) - 0x80..0 for rs6000.cc and rs6000.md.
>
> Bootstrap & regtest pass on ppc64{,le}.
> Is this ok for trunk?
You didn't say it clearly but I guessed you have grepped in the whole
config/rs6000 directory, right? I noticed there are still two places
using this kind of expression in function constant_generates_xxspltiw,
but I assumed it's intentional as their types are not HOST_WIDE_INT.
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc: short sign_h_word = ((h_word & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc: int sign_word = ((word & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
If so, could you state it clearly in commit log like "with type
signed/unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT" or similar?
This patch is OK once the above question gets confirmed, thanks!
BR,
Kewen
>
> BR,
> Jeff (Jiufu)
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (num_insns_constant_gpr): Use sext_hwi.
> (darwin_rs6000_legitimate_lo_sum_const_p): Likewise.
> (mem_operand_gpr): Likewise.
> (mem_operand_ds_form): Likewise.
> (rs6000_legitimize_address): Likewise.
> (rs6000_emit_set_const): Likewise.
> (rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Likewise.
> (print_operand): Likewise.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.md: Likewise.
>
> ---
> gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
> gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> index 5efe9b22d8b..718072cc9a1 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> @@ -6021,7 +6021,7 @@ num_insns_constant_gpr (HOST_WIDE_INT value)
>
> else if (TARGET_POWERPC64)
> {
> - HOST_WIDE_INT low = ((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
> + HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (value, 32);
> HOST_WIDE_INT high = value >> 31;
>
> if (high == 0 || high == -1)
> @@ -8456,7 +8456,7 @@ darwin_rs6000_legitimate_lo_sum_const_p (rtx x, machine_mode mode)
> }
>
> /* We only care if the access(es) would cause a change to the high part. */
> - offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
> + offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
> return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
> }
>
> @@ -8522,7 +8522,7 @@ mem_operand_gpr (rtx op, machine_mode mode)
> if (GET_CODE (addr) == LO_SUM)
> /* For lo_sum addresses, we must allow any offset except one that
> causes a wrap, so test only the low 16 bits. */
> - offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
> + offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
>
> return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
> }
> @@ -8562,7 +8562,7 @@ mem_operand_ds_form (rtx op, machine_mode mode)
> if (GET_CODE (addr) == LO_SUM)
> /* For lo_sum addresses, we must allow any offset except one that
> causes a wrap, so test only the low 16 bits. */
> - offset = ((offset & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
> + offset = sext_hwi (offset, 16);
>
> return SIGNED_16BIT_OFFSET_EXTRA_P (offset, extra);
> }
> @@ -9136,7 +9136,7 @@ rs6000_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx oldx ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> {
> HOST_WIDE_INT high_int, low_int;
> rtx sum;
> - low_int = ((INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
> + low_int = sext_hwi (INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)), 16);
> if (low_int >= 0x8000 - extra)
> low_int = 0;
> high_int = INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) - low_int;
> @@ -10203,7 +10203,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_const (rtx dest, rtx source)
> lo = operand_subword_force (dest, WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN != 0,
> DImode);
> emit_move_insn (hi, GEN_INT (c >> 32));
> - c = ((c & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000;
> + c = sext_hwi (c, 32);
> emit_move_insn (lo, GEN_INT (c));
> }
> else
> @@ -10242,7 +10242,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
>
> if ((ud4 == 0xffff && ud3 == 0xffff && ud2 == 0xffff && (ud1 & 0x8000))
> || (ud4 == 0 && ud3 == 0 && ud2 == 0 && ! (ud1 & 0x8000)))
> - emit_move_insn (dest, GEN_INT ((ud1 ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000));
> + emit_move_insn (dest, GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud1, 16)));
>
> else if ((ud4 == 0xffff && ud3 == 0xffff && (ud2 & 0x8000))
> || (ud4 == 0 && ud3 == 0 && ! (ud2 & 0x8000)))
> @@ -10250,7 +10250,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
> temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
>
> emit_move_insn (ud1 != 0 ? copy_rtx (temp) : dest,
> - GEN_INT (((ud2 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
> + GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud2 << 16, 32)));
> if (ud1 != 0)
> emit_move_insn (dest,
> gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
> @@ -10261,8 +10261,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
> temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
>
> gcc_assert (ud2 & 0x8000);
> - emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
> - GEN_INT (((ud2 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
> + emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud2 << 16, 32)));
> if (ud1 != 0)
> emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
> gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
> @@ -10273,7 +10272,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
> {
> temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
> HOST_WIDE_INT num = (ud2 << 16) | ud1;
> - rs6000_emit_set_long_const (temp, (num ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
> + rs6000_emit_set_long_const (temp, sext_hwi (num, 32));
> rtx one = gen_rtx_AND (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (0xffffffff));
> rtx two = gen_rtx_ASHIFT (DImode, temp, GEN_INT (32));
> emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, one, two));
> @@ -10283,8 +10282,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
> {
> temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
>
> - emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
> - GEN_INT (((ud3 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
> + emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud3 << 16, 32)));
> if (ud2 != 0)
> emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
> gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
> @@ -10336,8 +10334,7 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
> {
> temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
>
> - emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
> - GEN_INT (((ud4 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
> + emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp), GEN_INT (sext_hwi (ud4 << 16, 32)));
> if (ud3 != 0)
> emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
> gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
> @@ -14167,8 +14164,7 @@ print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int code)
> /* If constant, low-order 16 bits of constant, signed. Otherwise, write
> normally. */
> if (INT_P (x))
> - fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC,
> - ((INTVAL (x) & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000);
> + fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, sext_hwi (INTVAL (x), 16));
> else
> print_operand (file, x, 0);
> return;
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> index 3bae303086b..4bd1dfd3da9 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> @@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ (define_expand "add<mode>3"
> }
>
> HOST_WIDE_INT val = INTVAL (operands[2]);
> - HOST_WIDE_INT low = ((val & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
> + HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (val, 16);
> HOST_WIDE_INT rest = trunc_int_for_mode (val - low, <MODE>mode);
>
> if (<MODE>mode == DImode && !satisfies_constraint_L (GEN_INT (rest)))
> @@ -1930,7 +1930,7 @@ (define_split
> (set (match_dup 0) (plus:GPR (match_dup 0) (match_dup 4)))]
> {
> HOST_WIDE_INT val = INTVAL (operands[2]);
> - HOST_WIDE_INT low = ((val & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
> + HOST_WIDE_INT low = sext_hwi (val, 16);
> HOST_WIDE_INT rest = trunc_int_for_mode (val - low, <MODE>mode);
>
> operands[4] = GEN_INT (low);
> @@ -8213,7 +8213,7 @@ (define_split
> operands[2] = operand_subword (operands[0], endian, 0, <MODE>mode);
> operands[3] = operand_subword (operands[0], 1 - endian, 0, <MODE>mode);
> operands[4] = GEN_INT (value >> 32);
> - operands[1] = GEN_INT (((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
> + operands[1] = GEN_INT (sext_hwi (value, 32));
> })
>
> (define_split
> @@ -9577,7 +9577,7 @@ (define_split
> operands[3] = operand_subword_force (operands[0], WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN != 0,
> DImode);
> operands[4] = GEN_INT (value >> 32);
> - operands[1] = GEN_INT (((value & 0xffffffff) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
> + operands[1] = GEN_INT (sext_hwi (value, 32));
> })
>
> (define_split
> @@ -12425,7 +12425,7 @@ (define_peephole2
> SImode,
> operands[1], operands[2]);
> HOST_WIDE_INT c = INTVAL (cnst);
> - HOST_WIDE_INT sextc = ((c & 0xffff) ^ 0x8000) - 0x8000;
> + HOST_WIDE_INT sextc = sext_hwi (c, 16);
> HOST_WIDE_INT xorv = c ^ sextc;
>
> operands[9] = GEN_INT (xorv);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-01 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 1:36 [PATCH 1/3]rs6000: NFC use more readable pattern to clean high 32 bits Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 1:36 ` [PATCH 2/3]rs6000: NFC use sext_hwi to replace ((v&0xf..f)^0x80..0) - 0x80..0 Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 5:17 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
2022-12-01 5:30 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01 6:32 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 5:35 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 6:11 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01 7:10 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 12:16 ` guojiufu
2022-12-02 8:56 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-05 6:11 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-09 1:51 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 1:36 ` [PATCH 3/3]rs6000: NFC no need copy_rtx in rs6000_emit_set_long_const and rs6000_emit_set_const Jiufu Guo
2022-12-01 3:31 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-01 4:52 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-09 12:25 ` Jiufu Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94338e4c-baf4-ec09-68a7-064a23c79327@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linkw@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).