public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>
To: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>,
	gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [aarch64] Code-gen for vector initialization involving constants
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 15:52:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAgBjM=ryaC9h-9N_WWmPjcqE_fEA7xXPK8wye8TvFXsnMTyHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mpt354fw0dc.fsf@arm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6983 bytes --]

On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 14:56, Richard Sandiford
<richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org> writes:
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 16:29, Richard Sandiford
> > <richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org> writes:
> >> > Hi Richard,
> >> > While digging thru aarch64_expand_vector_init, I noticed it gives
> >> > priority to loading a constant first:
> >> >  /* Initialise a vector which is part-variable.  We want to first try
> >> >      to build those lanes which are constant in the most efficient way we
> >> >      can.  */
> >> >
> >> > which results in suboptimal code-gen for following case:
> >> > int16x8_t f_s16(int16_t x)
> >> > {
> >> >   return (int16x8_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > code-gen trunk:
> >> > f_s16:
> >> >         movi    v0.8h, 0x1
> >> >         ins     v0.h[0], w0
> >> >         ins     v0.h[1], w0
> >> >         ins     v0.h[2], w0
> >> >         ins     v0.h[3], w0
> >> >         ins     v0.h[4], w0
> >> >         ins     v0.h[5], w0
> >> >         ins     v0.h[6], w0
> >> >         ret
> >> >
> >> > The attached patch tweaks the following condition:
> >> > if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16)
> >> >   {
> >> >     ...
> >> >   }
> >> >
> >> > to pass if maxv >= 80% of n_elts, with 80% being an
> >> > arbitrary "high enough" threshold. The intent is to dup
> >> > the most repeating variable if it it's repetition
> >> > is "high enough" and insert constants which should be "better" than
> >> > loading constant first and inserting variables like in the above case.
> >>
> >> I'm not too keen on the 80%.  Like you say, it seems a bit arbitrary.
> >>
> >> The case above can also be handled by relaxing n_var == n_elts to
> >> n_var >= n_elts - 1, so that if there's just one constant element,
> >> we look for duplicated variable elements.  If there are none
> >> (maxv == 1), but there is a constant element, we can duplicate
> >> the constant element into a register.
> >>
> >> The case when there's more than one constant element needs more thought
> >> (and testcases :-)).  E.g. after a certain point, it would probably be
> >> better to load the variable and constant parts separately and blend them
> >> using TBL.  It also matters whether the constants are equal or not.
> >>
> >> There are also cases that could be handled using EXT.
> >>
> >> Plus, if we're inserting many variable elements that are already
> >> in GPRs, we can probably do better by coalescing them into bigger
> >> GPR values and inserting them as wider elements.
> >>
> >> Because of things like that, I think we should stick to the
> >> single-constant case for now.
> > Hi Richard,
> > Thanks for the suggestions. The attached patch only handles the single
> > constant case.
> > Bootstrap+test in progress on aarch64-linux-gnu.
> > Does it look OK ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Prathamesh
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Richard
> >
> > [aarch64] Improve code-gen for vector initialization with single constant element.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >       * config/aarch64/aarc64.cc (aarch64_expand_vector_init): Tweak condition
> >       if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16) to allow a single constant,
> >       and if maxv == 1, use constant element for duplicating into register.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >       * gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c: New test.
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > index 2b0de7ca038..f46750133a6 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > @@ -22167,7 +22167,7 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
> >       and matches[X][1] with the count of duplicate elements (if X is the
> >       earliest element which has duplicates).  */
> >
> > -  if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16)
> > +  if ((n_var >= n_elts - 1) && n_elts <= 16)
> >      {
> >        int matches[16][2] = {0};
> >        for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
> > @@ -22227,6 +22227,18 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
> >            vector register.  For big-endian we want that position to hold
> >            the last element of VALS.  */
> >         maxelement = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? n_elts - 1 : 0;
> > +
> > +       /* If we have a single constant element, use that for duplicating
> > +          instead.  */
> > +       if (n_var == n_elts - 1)
> > +         for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
> > +           if (CONST_INT_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i))
> > +               || CONST_DOUBLE_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)))
> > +             {
> > +               maxelement = i;
> > +               break;
> > +             }
> > +
> >         rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement));
> >         aarch64_emit_move (target, lowpart_subreg (mode, x, inner_mode));
>
> We don't want to force the constant into a register though.
OK right, sorry.
With the attached patch, for the following test-case:
int64x2_t f_s64(int64_t x)
{
  return (int64x2_t) { x, 1 };
}

it loads constant from memory (same code-gen as without patch).
f_s64:
        adrp    x1, .LC0
        ldr     q0, [x1, #:lo12:.LC0]
        ins     v0.d[0], x0
        ret

Does the patch look OK ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh


>
> >       }
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..517f47b13ec
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> > +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
> > +
> > +#include <arm_neon.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > +** f_s8:
> > +**   ...
> > +**   dup     v[0-9]+\.16b, w[0-9]+
> > +**   movi    v[0-9]+\.8b, 0x1
> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.b\[15\], v[0-9]+\.b\[0\]
> > +**   ...
> > +**   ret
> > +*/
> > +
> > +int8x16_t f_s8(int8_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return (int8x16_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
> > +                       x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > +** f_s16:
> > +**   ...
> > +**   dup     v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
> > +**   movi    v[0-9]+\.4h, 0x1
> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.h\[7\], v[0-9]+\.h\[0\]
> > +**   ...
> > +**   ret
> > +*/
> > +
> > +int16x8_t f_s16(int16_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return (int16x8_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > +** f_s32:
> > +**   ...
> > +**   movi    v[0-9]\.2s, 0x1
> > +**   dup     v[0-9]\.4s, w[0-9]+
> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.s\[3\], v[0-9]+\.s\[0\]
> > +**   ...
> > +**   ret
> > +*/
> > +
> > +int32x4_t f_s32(int32_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return (int32x4_t) { x, x, x, 1 };
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > +** f_s64:
> > +**   ...
> > +**   fmov    d[0-9]+, x[0-9]+
> > +**   mov     x[0-9]+, 1
> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.d\[1\], x[0-9]+
> > +**   ...
> > +**   ret
> > +*/
> > +
> > +int64x2_t f_s64(int64_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return (int64x2_t) { x, 1 };
> > +}

[-- Attachment #2: gnu-780-4.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3326 bytes --]

[aarch64] Improve code-gen for vector initialization with single constant element.

gcc/ChangeLog:
	* config/aarch64/aarc64.cc (aarch64_expand_vector_init): Tweak condition
	if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16) to allow a single constant,
	and if maxv == 1, use constant element for duplicating into register.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
	* gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 2b0de7ca038..97309ddec4f 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -22167,7 +22167,7 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
      and matches[X][1] with the count of duplicate elements (if X is the
      earliest element which has duplicates).  */
 
-  if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16)
+  if ((n_var >= n_elts - 1) && n_elts <= 16)
     {
       int matches[16][2] = {0};
       for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
@@ -22227,8 +22227,26 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
 	     vector register.  For big-endian we want that position to hold
 	     the last element of VALS.  */
 	  maxelement = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? n_elts - 1 : 0;
-	  rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement));
-	  aarch64_emit_move (target, lowpart_subreg (mode, x, inner_mode));
+
+	  /* If we have a single constant element, use that for duplicating
+	     instead.  */
+	  if (n_var == n_elts - 1)
+	    for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
+	      if (CONST_INT_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i))
+		  || CONST_DOUBLE_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)))
+		{
+		  maxelement = i;
+		  break;
+		}
+
+	  rtx maxval = XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement);
+	  if (!(CONST_INT_P (maxval) || CONST_DOUBLE_P (maxval)))
+	    {
+	      rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement));
+	      aarch64_emit_move (target, lowpart_subreg (mode, x, inner_mode));
+	    }
+	  else
+	    aarch64_emit_move (target, gen_vec_duplicate (mode, maxval));
 	}
       else
 	{
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..682fd43439a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
+
+#include <arm_neon.h>
+
+/*
+** f_s8:
+**	...
+**	dup	v[0-9]+\.16b, w[0-9]+
+**	movi	v[0-9]+\.8b, 0x1
+**	ins	v[0-9]+\.b\[15\], v[0-9]+\.b\[0\]
+**	...
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int8x16_t f_s8(int8_t x)
+{
+  return (int8x16_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+                       x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s16:
+**	...
+**	dup	v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
+**	movi	v[0-9]+\.4h, 0x1
+**	ins	v[0-9]+\.h\[7\], v[0-9]+\.h\[0\]
+**	...
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int16x8_t f_s16(int16_t x)
+{
+  return (int16x8_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s32:
+**	...
+**	movi	v[0-9]\.2s, 0x1
+**	dup	v[0-9]\.4s, w[0-9]+
+**	ins	v[0-9]+\.s\[3\], v[0-9]+\.s\[0\]
+**	...
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int32x4_t f_s32(int32_t x)
+{
+  return (int32x4_t) { x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s64:
+**	...
+**	adrp	x[0-9]+, .LC[0-9]+
+**	ldr	q[0-9]+, \[x[0-9]+, #:lo12:.LC[0-9]+\]
+**	ins	v[0-9]+\.d\[0\], x[0-9]+
+**	...
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int64x2_t f_s64(int64_t x)
+{
+  return (int64x2_t) { x, 1 };
+}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-02 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-03  7:16 Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-13  6:28 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-03 18:12   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-25 10:59 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-02  5:41   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-02  9:25     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-02 10:22       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni [this message]
2023-05-02 12:02         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-02 12:38           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-02 12:52             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-03 11:28               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-11 19:15                 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-15 14:09                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-15 18:59                     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-17 15:23                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-18  8:07                         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-18 14:41                           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-18 16:34                             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-19 10:56                               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-22  8:48                                 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-24  9:29                                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-24 10:10                                     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-24 19:13                                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-24 19:58                                         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-25  6:47                                           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-25  7:34                                             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-25  9:56                                               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-26  3:04                                                 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-30 18:53                                                   ` Richard Sandiford
2023-06-12 17:52                                                     ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-24 19:50                                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAgBjM=ryaC9h-9N_WWmPjcqE_fEA7xXPK8wye8TvFXsnMTyHg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).