public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>
To: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>,
	gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [aarch64] Code-gen for vector initialization involving constants
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 16:58:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAgBjMn6tOT3HpOdjB3f47D_qAVC2S1jsoGVGvnJ7uk6vDcKdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mpt7ctqvqsz.fsf@arm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10215 bytes --]

On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 18:22, Richard Sandiford
<richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org> writes:
> > On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 17:32, Richard Sandiford
> > <richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org> writes:
> >> > On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 14:56, Richard Sandiford
> >> > <richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
> >> >> > [aarch64] Improve code-gen for vector initialization with single constant element.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >> >> >       * config/aarch64/aarc64.cc (aarch64_expand_vector_init): Tweak condition
> >> >> >       if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16) to allow a single constant,
> >> >> >       and if maxv == 1, use constant element for duplicating into register.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >> >> >       * gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c: New test.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> >> > index 2b0de7ca038..f46750133a6 100644
> >> >> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> >> > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> >> > @@ -22167,7 +22167,7 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
> >> >> >       and matches[X][1] with the count of duplicate elements (if X is the
> >> >> >       earliest element which has duplicates).  */
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -  if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16)
> >> >> > +  if ((n_var >= n_elts - 1) && n_elts <= 16)
> >> >> >      {
> >> >> >        int matches[16][2] = {0};
> >> >> >        for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
> >> >> > @@ -22227,6 +22227,18 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
> >> >> >            vector register.  For big-endian we want that position to hold
> >> >> >            the last element of VALS.  */
> >> >> >         maxelement = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? n_elts - 1 : 0;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       /* If we have a single constant element, use that for duplicating
> >> >> > +          instead.  */
> >> >> > +       if (n_var == n_elts - 1)
> >> >> > +         for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
> >> >> > +           if (CONST_INT_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i))
> >> >> > +               || CONST_DOUBLE_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)))
> >> >> > +             {
> >> >> > +               maxelement = i;
> >> >> > +               break;
> >> >> > +             }
> >> >> > +
> >> >> >         rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement));
> >> >> >         aarch64_emit_move (target, lowpart_subreg (mode, x, inner_mode));
> >> >>
> >> >> We don't want to force the constant into a register though.
> >> > OK right, sorry.
> >> > With the attached patch, for the following test-case:
> >> > int64x2_t f_s64(int64_t x)
> >> > {
> >> >   return (int64x2_t) { x, 1 };
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > it loads constant from memory (same code-gen as without patch).
> >> > f_s64:
> >> >         adrp    x1, .LC0
> >> >         ldr     q0, [x1, #:lo12:.LC0]
> >> >         ins     v0.d[0], x0
> >> >         ret
> >> >
> >> > Does the patch look OK ?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Prathamesh
> >> > [...]
> >> > [aarch64] Improve code-gen for vector initialization with single constant element.
> >> >
> >> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >> >       * config/aarch64/aarc64.cc (aarch64_expand_vector_init): Tweak condition
> >> >       if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16) to allow a single constant,
> >> >       and if maxv == 1, use constant element for duplicating into register.
> >> >
> >> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >> >       * gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c: New test.
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> > index 2b0de7ca038..97309ddec4f 100644
> >> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> > @@ -22167,7 +22167,7 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
> >> >       and matches[X][1] with the count of duplicate elements (if X is the
> >> >       earliest element which has duplicates).  */
> >> >
> >> > -  if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16)
> >> > +  if ((n_var >= n_elts - 1) && n_elts <= 16)
> >>
> >> No need for the extra brackets.
> > Adjusted, thanks. Sorry if this sounds like a silly question, but why
> > do we need the n_elts <= 16 check ?
> > Won't n_elts be always <= 16 since max number of elements in a vector
> > would be 16 for V16QI ?
>
> Was wondering the same thing :)
>
> Let's leave it though.
>
> >> >      {
> >> >        int matches[16][2] = {0};
> >> >        for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
> >> > @@ -22227,8 +22227,26 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
> >> >            vector register.  For big-endian we want that position to hold
> >> >            the last element of VALS.  */
> >> >         maxelement = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? n_elts - 1 : 0;
> >> > -       rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement));
> >> > -       aarch64_emit_move (target, lowpart_subreg (mode, x, inner_mode));
> >> > +
> >> > +       /* If we have a single constant element, use that for duplicating
> >> > +          instead.  */
> >> > +       if (n_var == n_elts - 1)
> >> > +         for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
> >> > +           if (CONST_INT_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i))
> >> > +               || CONST_DOUBLE_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)))
> >> > +             {
> >> > +               maxelement = i;
> >> > +               break;
> >> > +             }
> >> > +
> >> > +       rtx maxval = XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement);
> >> > +       if (!(CONST_INT_P (maxval) || CONST_DOUBLE_P (maxval)))
> >> > +         {
> >> > +           rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement));
> >> > +           aarch64_emit_move (target, lowpart_subreg (mode, x, inner_mode));
> >> > +         }
> >> > +       else
> >> > +         aarch64_emit_move (target, gen_vec_duplicate (mode, maxval));
> >> >       }
> >> >        else
> >> >       {
> >>
> >> This seems a bit convoluted.  It might be easier to record whether
> >> we see a CONST_INT_P or a CONST_DOUBLE_P during the previous loop,
> >> and if so what the constant is.  Then handle that case first,
> >> as a separate arm of the "if".
> > Adjusted in the attached patch. Does it look OK ?
>
> I meant: adjust
>
>       int maxelement = 0;
>       int maxv = 0;
>       for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
>         if (matches[i][1] > maxv)
>           {
>             maxelement = i;
>             maxv = matches[i][1];
>           }
>
> so that it also records any CONST_INT or CONST_DOUBLE (as an rtx).
Oh right. Adjusted in the attached patch, but I also added
const_elem_pos to keep track of the position,
to set maxelement to it since it's later used to skip duplicated element here:

    /* Insert the rest.  */
      for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
        {
          rtx x = XVECEXP (vals, 0, i);
          if (matches[i][0] == maxelement)
            continue;
          x = force_reg (inner_mode, x);
          emit_insn (GEN_FCN (icode) (target, x, GEN_INT (i)));
        }
      return;

Does that look OK ?
>
> >> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c
> >> > new file mode 100644
> >> > index 00000000000..682fd43439a
> >> > --- /dev/null
> >> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c
> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> >> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> >> > +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> >> > +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
> >> > +
> >> > +#include <arm_neon.h>
> >> > +
> >> > +/*
> >> > +** f_s8:
> >> > +**   ...
> >> > +**   dup     v[0-9]+\.16b, w[0-9]+
> >> > +**   movi    v[0-9]+\.8b, 0x1
> >> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.b\[15\], v[0-9]+\.b\[0\]
> >> > +**   ...
> >> > +**   ret
> >>
> >> Like with the divide-and-conquer patch, there's nothing that requires
> >> the first two instructions to be in that order.
> > Hmm, will it be OK to disable scheduling by passing
> > -fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2
> > for the test ?
>
> Guess we might as well try that for now.
>
> Elsewhere I've used:
>
>   (
>      first sequence
>   |
>      second sequence
>   )
>      common part
>
> but we probably have enough control over the unscheduled sequence
> for that not to be necessary here.
>
> >> What is the second ... hiding?  What sequences do we actually generate?
> > Sorry, added them by mistake. They were the exact sequences. Adjusted
> > tests in the patch.
> >>
> >> BTW, remember to say how patches were tested :-)
> > Right, sorry. The patch is under bootstrap+test on aarch64-linux-gnu.
>
> Please also test the new tests on big-endian.
Done, thanks.
>
> > +/*
> > +** f_s8:
> > +**   dup     v[0-9]+\.16b, w[0-9]+
>
> Without the ...s, this must be v0 and w0 respectively
>
> > +**   movi    v[0-9]+\.8b, 0x1
>
> Would be good to capture the register number here and use \1 in the
> following line.
>
> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.b\[15\], v[0-9]+\.b\[0\]
>
> Similarly v0 for the first operand here.
Done, thanks.
I verified the big-endian test passes on aarch64_be-linux-gnu, and
patch is under bootstrap+test on aarch64-linux-gnu.
OK to commit if passes ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
> > +**   ret
> > +*/
> > +
> > +int8x16_t f_s8(int8_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return (int8x16_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
> > +                       x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > +** f_s16:
> > +**   dup     v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
> > +**   movi    v[0-9]+\.4h, 0x1
> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.h\[7\], v[0-9]+\.h\[0\]
> > +**   ret
> > +*/
> > +
> > +int16x8_t f_s16(int16_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return (int16x8_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > +** f_s32:
> > +**   dup     v[0-9]\.4s, w[0-9]+
> > +**   movi    v[0-9]\.2s, 0x1
> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.s\[3\], v[0-9]+\.s\[0\]
> > +**   ret
> > +*/
> > +
> > +int32x4_t f_s32(int32_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return (int32x4_t) { x, x, x, 1 };
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > +** f_s64:
> > +**   adrp    x[0-9]+, .LC[0-9]+
> > +**   ldr     q[0-9]+, \[x[0-9]+, #:lo12:.LC[0-9]+\]
> > +**   ins     v[0-9]+\.d\[0\], x[0-9]+
> > +**   ret
> > +*/
> > +
> > +int64x2_t f_s64(int64_t x)
> > +{
> > +  return (int64x2_t) { x, 1 };
> > +}

[-- Attachment #2: gnu-780-7.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5105 bytes --]

[aarch64] Improve code-gen for vector initialization with single constant element.

gcc/ChangeLog:
	* config/aarch64/aarc64.cc (aarch64_expand_vector_init): Tweak condition
	if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16) to allow a single constant,
	and if maxv == 1, use constant element for duplicating into register.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
	* gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const-be.c: Likewise.

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 2b0de7ca038..1ae8cf530e9 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -22167,7 +22167,7 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
      and matches[X][1] with the count of duplicate elements (if X is the
      earliest element which has duplicates).  */
 
-  if (n_var == n_elts && n_elts <= 16)
+  if (n_var >= n_elts - 1 && n_elts <= 16)
     {
       int matches[16][2] = {0};
       for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
@@ -22184,12 +22184,23 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
 	}
       int maxelement = 0;
       int maxv = 0;
+      rtx const_elem = NULL_RTX;
+      int const_elem_pos = 0;
+
       for (int i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
-	if (matches[i][1] > maxv)
-	  {
-	    maxelement = i;
-	    maxv = matches[i][1];
-	  }
+	{
+	  if (matches[i][1] > maxv)
+	    {
+	      maxelement = i;
+	      maxv = matches[i][1];
+	    }
+	  if (CONST_INT_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i))
+	      || CONST_DOUBLE_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)))
+	    {
+	      const_elem_pos = i; 
+	      const_elem = XVECEXP (vals, 0, i);
+	    }
+	}
 
       /* Create a duplicate of the most common element, unless all elements
 	 are equally useless to us, in which case just immediately set the
@@ -22227,8 +22238,19 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
 	     vector register.  For big-endian we want that position to hold
 	     the last element of VALS.  */
 	  maxelement = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? n_elts - 1 : 0;
-	  rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement));
-	  aarch64_emit_move (target, lowpart_subreg (mode, x, inner_mode));
+
+	  /* If we have a single constant element, use that for duplicating
+	     instead.  */
+	  if (const_elem)
+	    {
+	      maxelement = const_elem_pos;
+	      aarch64_emit_move (target, gen_vec_duplicate (mode, const_elem));
+	    }
+	  else
+	    {
+	      rtx x = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, maxelement));
+	      aarch64_emit_move (target, lowpart_subreg (mode, x, inner_mode));
+	    }
 	}
       else
 	{
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const-be.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const-be.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f84befa4c11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const-be.c
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2" } */
+/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" { target { be } } } } */
+
+#include <arm_neon.h>
+
+/*
+** f_s8:
+**	dup	v0.16b, w0
+**	movi	(v[0-9]+)\.8b, 0x1
+**	ins	v0.b\[0\], \1\.b\[0\]
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int8x16_t f_s8(int8_t x)
+{
+  return (int8x16_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+                       x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s16:
+**	dup	v0.8h, w0
+**	movi	(v[0-9]+)\.4h, 0x1
+**	ins	v0.h\[0\], \1\.h\[0\]
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int16x8_t f_s16(int16_t x)
+{
+  return (int16x8_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s32:
+**	dup	v0.4s, w0
+**	movi	(v[0-9])\.2s, 0x1
+**	ins	v0.s\[0\], \1\.s\[0\]
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int32x4_t f_s32(int32_t x)
+{
+  return (int32x4_t) { x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s64:
+**	adrp	x[0-9]+, .LC[0-9]+
+**	ldr	q0, \[x[0-9]+, #:lo12:.LC[0-9]+\]
+**	ins	v0\.d\[1\], x0
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int64x2_t f_s64(int64_t x)
+{
+  return (int64x2_t) { x, 1 };
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f736bfc3b68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vec-init-single-const.c
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2" } */
+/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" { target { le } } } } */
+
+#include <arm_neon.h>
+
+/*
+** f_s8:
+**	dup	v0.16b, w0
+**	movi	(v[0-9]+)\.8b, 0x1
+**	ins	v0.b\[15\], \1\.b\[0\]
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int8x16_t f_s8(int8_t x)
+{
+  return (int8x16_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x,
+                       x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s16:
+**	dup	v0.8h, w0
+**	movi	(v[0-9]+)\.4h, 0x1
+**	ins	v0.h\[7\], \1\.h\[0\]
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int16x8_t f_s16(int16_t x)
+{
+  return (int16x8_t) { x, x, x, x, x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s32:
+**	dup	v0.4s, w0
+**	movi	(v[0-9])\.2s, 0x1
+**	ins	v0.s\[3\], \1\.s\[0\]
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int32x4_t f_s32(int32_t x)
+{
+  return (int32x4_t) { x, x, x, 1 };
+}
+
+/*
+** f_s64:
+**	adrp	x[0-9]+, .LC[0-9]+
+**	ldr	q0, \[x[0-9]+, #:lo12:.LC[0-9]+\]
+**	ins	v0\.d\[0\], x0
+**	ret
+*/
+
+int64x2_t f_s64(int64_t x)
+{
+  return (int64x2_t) { x, 1 };
+}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-03 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-03  7:16 Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-13  6:28 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-03 18:12   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-25 10:59 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-02  5:41   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-02  9:25     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-02 10:22       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-02 12:02         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-02 12:38           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-02 12:52             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-03 11:28               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni [this message]
2023-05-11 19:15                 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-15 14:09                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-15 18:59                     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-17 15:23                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-18  8:07                         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-18 14:41                           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-18 16:34                             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-19 10:56                               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-22  8:48                                 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-24  9:29                                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-24 10:10                                     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-24 19:13                                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-24 19:58                                         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-25  6:47                                           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-25  7:34                                             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-25  9:56                                               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-26  3:04                                                 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-30 18:53                                                   ` Richard Sandiford
2023-06-12 17:52                                                     ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-24 19:50                                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAgBjMn6tOT3HpOdjB3f47D_qAVC2S1jsoGVGvnJ7uk6vDcKdA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).