public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Stubbs <ams@codesourcery.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgomp: fix hang on fatal error
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:08:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1AhAqwV0TlAjEGX@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0/7WLIcxi0c1Mth@tucnak>

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 03:27:52PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > --- a/libgomp/error.c
> > +++ b/libgomp/error.c
> > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void
> >  gomp_vfatal (const char *fmt, va_list list)
> >  {
> >    gomp_verror (fmt, list);
> > -  exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
> > +  abort ();
> >  }
> >  
> >  void
> 
> I don't like this, abort has quite different user visible behavior
> from exit, e.g. the former often dumps core.
> 
> I believe in most places libgomp handles this by releasing locks before
> calling gomp_{,v}fatal:
>       gomp_mutex_unlock (&register_lock);
>       gomp_fatal ("Out of memory allocating %lu bytes", (unsigned long) size);
> 
>       gomp_mutex_unlock (&devicep->lock);
>       gomp_fatal ("Copying of %s object [%p..%p) to %s object [%p..%p) failed",
>                   src, srcaddr, srcaddr + size, dst, dstaddr, dstaddr + size);
> 
> etc.
> I could live with a gomp_fatal/gomp_vfatal alternative that would
> use _exit/_Exit (but not sure if it is supported on all targets where
> libgomp is) for uses where releasing locks is for whatever reason
> not an option.

Or yet another possibility would be not use gomp_fatal from within the
plugins, but use gomp_error instead and through possibly adjusted plugin
APIs tell libgomp that there was a fatal error and let libgomp unlock
anything that needs unlocking and exit (EXIT_FAILURE); afterwards.

	Jakub


      reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-14 17:04 Andrew Stubbs
2022-10-19 13:27 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-19 16:08   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1AhAqwV0TlAjEGX@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=ams@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).