From: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>
To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <Richard.Sandiford@arm.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgcc: Fix uninitialized RA signing on AArch64 [PR107678]
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 14:57:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7blZSKT/tAY/j6A@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PAWPR08MB8982E2084E58E8FCA076D29B83F49@PAWPR08MB8982.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
The 01/03/2023 17:27, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > Also, if I understood correctly, the reason we use REG_UNSAVED is to
> > ensure that state from one frame isn't carried across to a parent frame,
> > in cases where the parent frame lacks any signing. That is, each frame
> > should start out with a zero bit even if a child frame is unwound while
> > it has a set bit.
>
> This works fine since all registers are initialized to REG_UNSAVED every frame.
>
> In v2 I've removed some clutter and encode the signing state in REG_UNSAVED/
> REG_UNDEFINED.
this looks good to me.
> @@ -1206,8 +1205,10 @@ execute_cfa_program (const unsigned char *insn_ptr,
> /* This CFA is multiplexed with Sparc. On AArch64 it's used to toggle
> return address signing status. */
> reg = DWARF_REGNUM_AARCH64_RA_STATE;
> - gcc_assert (fs->regs.how[reg] == REG_UNSAVED);
> - fs->regs.reg[reg].loc.offset ^= 1;
> + if (fs->regs.how[reg] == REG_UNSAVED)
> + fs->regs.how[reg] = REG_UNDEFINED;
> + else
> + fs->regs.how[reg] = REG_UNSAVED;
> #else
> /* ??? Hardcoded for SPARC register window configuration. */
> if (__LIBGCC_DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS__ >= 32)
i would keep the assert: how[reg] must be either UNSAVED or UNDEFINED
here, other how[reg] means the toggle cfi instruction is mixed with
incompatible instructions for the pseudo reg.
and i would add a comment about this e.g. saying that UNSAVED/UNDEFINED
how[reg] is used for tracking the return address signing status and
other how[reg] is not allowed here.
otherwise the patch looks good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-05 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 16:55 Wilco Dijkstra
2022-12-05 19:04 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-06 10:50 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2022-12-06 11:58 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-12-06 21:33 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-01-03 17:27 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-01-05 14:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy [this message]
2023-01-10 16:33 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-01-10 18:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-11 11:33 ` Martin Liška
2023-01-11 11:59 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-01-12 10:49 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-12 12:05 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-12 12:08 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-12 12:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-12 14:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-12 15:22 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-12 15:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-12 15:40 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-12 18:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-16 13:04 ` Martin Liška
2023-01-17 19:49 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-01-17 20:43 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-18 12:49 ` Wilco Dijkstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7blZSKT/tAY/j6A@arm.com \
--to=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).