From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wilco Dijkstra" <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>,
"Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>,
"Kyrylo Tkachov" <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>,
"Szabolcs Nagy" <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
"GCC Patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgcc: Fix uninitialized RA signing on AArch64 [PR107678]
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 15:22:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mptcz7jwze7.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8AbvuABbC5S5AI2@tucnak> (Jakub Jelinek's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2023 15:39:58 +0100")
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 01:28:59PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > Although we don't AFAIK support using DW_CFA_undefined with RA signing,
>> > the failure mode would be non-obvious: it would effectively toggle the
>> > bit on.
>>
>> We don't install unwind-dw2.h nor give user code access to the how array
>> (and it just lives on the stack of __frame_state_for/uw_init_context_1
>> functions and address of it is passed to functions called from it),
>> so I hope all this is private to the libgcc unwinder. After all, otherwise
>> e.g. the change how "how" is represented couldn't be done.
>> That said, if new enum entries are added in the generic code, then
>> I think uw_update_context_1 will warn about unhandled case in a switch,
>> unless we e.g. change
>> case REG_UNSAVED:
>> case REG_UNDEFINED:
>> break;
>> to
>> default:
>> break;
>> (and provided that the new enums would want such handling).
If we have a new enum, I think we should handle it explicitly. The fact
that the information isn't propagated between frames is a key part of
the semantics.
>> Another option is to just define the arch dependent value for how field
>> in the arch code, right now it is unsigned char type, so using say
>> (unsigned char) ~0 or (unsigned char) ~0 and (unsigned char) ~1 as arch
>> specific values might be ok too.
>
> Yet another option would be to define 1-2 extra REG_ values in the generic
> unwind-dw2.h header, but name them
> REG_ARCH_SPECIFIC_1,
> REG_ARCH_SPECIFIC_2,
> or so, and then the machine specific code can
> #define REG_AARCH64_TOGGLE_ON REG_ARCH_SPECIFIC_1
> Of course, all this depends on whether the arch specific codes can be
> handled in uw_update_context_1 by doing break; there and nothing else.
Yeah, personally I'd prefer for target-independent code to provide
the toggle representation, even if it isn't widely used.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 16:55 Wilco Dijkstra
2022-12-05 19:04 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-06 10:50 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2022-12-06 11:58 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-12-06 21:33 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-01-03 17:27 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-01-05 14:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-01-10 16:33 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-01-10 18:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-11 11:33 ` Martin Liška
2023-01-11 11:59 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-01-12 10:49 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-12 12:05 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-12 12:08 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-12 12:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-12 14:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-12 15:22 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2023-01-12 15:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-12 15:40 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-12 18:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-16 13:04 ` Martin Liška
2023-01-17 19:49 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-01-17 20:43 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-18 12:49 ` Wilco Dijkstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mptcz7jwze7.fsf@arm.com \
--to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=mliska@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).