* [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] @ 2022-04-29 14:12 Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 11:41 ` Marek Polacek ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Marek Polacek @ 2022-04-29 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: GCC Patches, Jason Merrill This patch fixes crashes with invalid attributes. Arguably it could make sense to assert seen_error() too. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk = GCC 13? PR c++/96637 gcc/ChangeLog: * attribs.cc (decl_attributes): Check error_mark_node. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * decl2.cc (cp_check_const_attributes): Check error_mark_node. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/parse/error64.C: New test. --- gcc/attribs.cc | 3 +++ gcc/cp/decl2.cc | 2 ++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C diff --git a/gcc/attribs.cc b/gcc/attribs.cc index b219f878042..ff157dcf81c 100644 --- a/gcc/attribs.cc +++ b/gcc/attribs.cc @@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ decl_attributes (tree *node, tree attributes, int flags, in the same order as in the source. */ for (tree attr = attributes; attr; attr = TREE_CHAIN (attr)) { + if (attr == error_mark_node) + continue; + tree ns = get_attribute_namespace (attr); tree name = get_attribute_name (attr); tree args = TREE_VALUE (attr); diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc index d2b29208ed5..c3ff1962a75 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc @@ -1537,6 +1537,8 @@ cp_check_const_attributes (tree attributes) /* As we implement alignas using gnu::aligned attribute and alignas argument is a constant expression, force manifestly constant evaluation of aligned attribute argument. */ + if (attr == error_mark_node) + continue; bool manifestly_const_eval = is_attribute_p ("aligned", get_attribute_name (attr)); for (arg = TREE_VALUE (attr); arg && TREE_CODE (arg) == TREE_LIST; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..87848a58c27 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +// PR c++/96637 +// { dg-do compile } + +void foo(int[] alignas[1] alignas(1)){} // { dg-error "" } base-commit: 9ae8b993cd362e8aea4f65580aaf1453120207f2 -- 2.35.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] 2022-04-29 14:12 [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] Marek Polacek @ 2022-05-24 11:41 ` Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 11:59 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni 2022-05-24 12:22 ` Jason Merrill 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Marek Polacek @ 2022-05-24 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: GCC Patches, Jason Merrill Ping. On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:12:33AM -0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote: > This patch fixes crashes with invalid attributes. Arguably it could > make sense to assert seen_error() too. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk = GCC 13? > > PR c++/96637 > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * attribs.cc (decl_attributes): Check error_mark_node. > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * decl2.cc (cp_check_const_attributes): Check error_mark_node. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/parse/error64.C: New test. > --- > gcc/attribs.cc | 3 +++ > gcc/cp/decl2.cc | 2 ++ > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > > diff --git a/gcc/attribs.cc b/gcc/attribs.cc > index b219f878042..ff157dcf81c 100644 > --- a/gcc/attribs.cc > +++ b/gcc/attribs.cc > @@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ decl_attributes (tree *node, tree attributes, int flags, > in the same order as in the source. */ > for (tree attr = attributes; attr; attr = TREE_CHAIN (attr)) > { > + if (attr == error_mark_node) > + continue; > + > tree ns = get_attribute_namespace (attr); > tree name = get_attribute_name (attr); > tree args = TREE_VALUE (attr); > diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > index d2b29208ed5..c3ff1962a75 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > @@ -1537,6 +1537,8 @@ cp_check_const_attributes (tree attributes) > /* As we implement alignas using gnu::aligned attribute and > alignas argument is a constant expression, force manifestly > constant evaluation of aligned attribute argument. */ > + if (attr == error_mark_node) > + continue; > bool manifestly_const_eval > = is_attribute_p ("aligned", get_attribute_name (attr)); > for (arg = TREE_VALUE (attr); arg && TREE_CODE (arg) == TREE_LIST; > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..87848a58c27 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +// PR c++/96637 > +// { dg-do compile } > + > +void foo(int[] alignas[1] alignas(1)){} // { dg-error "" } > > base-commit: 9ae8b993cd362e8aea4f65580aaf1453120207f2 > -- > 2.35.1 > Marek ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] 2022-04-29 14:12 [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 11:41 ` Marek Polacek @ 2022-05-24 11:59 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni 2022-05-24 12:40 ` Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 12:22 ` Jason Merrill 2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Prathamesh Kulkarni @ 2022-05-24 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Polacek; +Cc: GCC Patches, Jason Merrill On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 19:44, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > This patch fixes crashes with invalid attributes. Arguably it could > make sense to assert seen_error() too. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk = GCC 13? > > PR c++/96637 > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * attribs.cc (decl_attributes): Check error_mark_node. > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * decl2.cc (cp_check_const_attributes): Check error_mark_node. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/parse/error64.C: New test. > --- > gcc/attribs.cc | 3 +++ > gcc/cp/decl2.cc | 2 ++ > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > > diff --git a/gcc/attribs.cc b/gcc/attribs.cc > index b219f878042..ff157dcf81c 100644 > --- a/gcc/attribs.cc > +++ b/gcc/attribs.cc > @@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ decl_attributes (tree *node, tree attributes, int flags, > in the same order as in the source. */ > for (tree attr = attributes; attr; attr = TREE_CHAIN (attr)) > { > + if (attr == error_mark_node) > + continue; Not a comment on the patch specifically, but just wondering if it'd be better to use error_operand_p, than testing against error_mark_node explicitly ? Thanks, Prathamesh > + > tree ns = get_attribute_namespace (attr); > tree name = get_attribute_name (attr); > tree args = TREE_VALUE (attr); > diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > index d2b29208ed5..c3ff1962a75 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > @@ -1537,6 +1537,8 @@ cp_check_const_attributes (tree attributes) > /* As we implement alignas using gnu::aligned attribute and > alignas argument is a constant expression, force manifestly > constant evaluation of aligned attribute argument. */ > + if (attr == error_mark_node) > + continue; > bool manifestly_const_eval > = is_attribute_p ("aligned", get_attribute_name (attr)); > for (arg = TREE_VALUE (attr); arg && TREE_CODE (arg) == TREE_LIST; > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..87848a58c27 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +// PR c++/96637 > +// { dg-do compile } > + > +void foo(int[] alignas[1] alignas(1)){} // { dg-error "" } > > base-commit: 9ae8b993cd362e8aea4f65580aaf1453120207f2 > -- > 2.35.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] 2022-05-24 11:59 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni @ 2022-05-24 12:40 ` Marek Polacek 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Marek Polacek @ 2022-05-24 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Prathamesh Kulkarni; +Cc: GCC Patches, Jason Merrill On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 05:29:56PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 19:44, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > This patch fixes crashes with invalid attributes. Arguably it could > > make sense to assert seen_error() too. > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk = GCC 13? > > > > PR c++/96637 > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * attribs.cc (decl_attributes): Check error_mark_node. > > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > > > * decl2.cc (cp_check_const_attributes): Check error_mark_node. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * g++.dg/parse/error64.C: New test. > > --- > > gcc/attribs.cc | 3 +++ > > gcc/cp/decl2.cc | 2 ++ > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C | 4 ++++ > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > > > > diff --git a/gcc/attribs.cc b/gcc/attribs.cc > > index b219f878042..ff157dcf81c 100644 > > --- a/gcc/attribs.cc > > +++ b/gcc/attribs.cc > > @@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ decl_attributes (tree *node, tree attributes, int flags, > > in the same order as in the source. */ > > for (tree attr = attributes; attr; attr = TREE_CHAIN (attr)) > > { > > + if (attr == error_mark_node) > > + continue; > Not a comment on the patch specifically, but just wondering if it'd be > better to use error_operand_p, > than testing against error_mark_node explicitly ? Not here, I don't think; it tests more than is needed here. Marek ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] 2022-04-29 14:12 [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 11:41 ` Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 11:59 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni @ 2022-05-24 12:22 ` Jason Merrill 2022-05-25 18:49 ` Marek Polacek 2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jason Merrill @ 2022-05-24 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Polacek, GCC Patches On 4/29/22 10:12, Marek Polacek wrote: > This patch fixes crashes with invalid attributes. Arguably it could > make sense to assert seen_error() too. So in this testcase we have TREE_CHAIN of a TREE_LIST pointing to error_mark_node? Can we avoid that? > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk = GCC 13? > > PR c++/96637 > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * attribs.cc (decl_attributes): Check error_mark_node. > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * decl2.cc (cp_check_const_attributes): Check error_mark_node. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/parse/error64.C: New test. > --- > gcc/attribs.cc | 3 +++ > gcc/cp/decl2.cc | 2 ++ > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > > diff --git a/gcc/attribs.cc b/gcc/attribs.cc > index b219f878042..ff157dcf81c 100644 > --- a/gcc/attribs.cc > +++ b/gcc/attribs.cc > @@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ decl_attributes (tree *node, tree attributes, int flags, > in the same order as in the source. */ > for (tree attr = attributes; attr; attr = TREE_CHAIN (attr)) > { > + if (attr == error_mark_node) > + continue; > + > tree ns = get_attribute_namespace (attr); > tree name = get_attribute_name (attr); > tree args = TREE_VALUE (attr); > diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > index d2b29208ed5..c3ff1962a75 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc > @@ -1537,6 +1537,8 @@ cp_check_const_attributes (tree attributes) > /* As we implement alignas using gnu::aligned attribute and > alignas argument is a constant expression, force manifestly > constant evaluation of aligned attribute argument. */ > + if (attr == error_mark_node) > + continue; > bool manifestly_const_eval > = is_attribute_p ("aligned", get_attribute_name (attr)); > for (arg = TREE_VALUE (attr); arg && TREE_CODE (arg) == TREE_LIST; > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..87848a58c27 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +// PR c++/96637 > +// { dg-do compile } > + > +void foo(int[] alignas[1] alignas(1)){} // { dg-error "" } > > base-commit: 9ae8b993cd362e8aea4f65580aaf1453120207f2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] 2022-05-24 12:22 ` Jason Merrill @ 2022-05-25 18:49 ` Marek Polacek 2022-05-25 19:51 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Marek Polacek @ 2022-05-25 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: GCC Patches On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 08:22:22AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 4/29/22 10:12, Marek Polacek wrote: > > This patch fixes crashes with invalid attributes. Arguably it could > > make sense to assert seen_error() too. > > So in this testcase we have TREE_CHAIN of a TREE_LIST pointing to > error_mark_node? Can we avoid that? Yes and yes. Sorry, my previous fix was lousy. This one is better: Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? -- >8 -- When chaining attributes, attr_chainon should be used rather than plain chainon, so that we don't end up with a TREE_LIST where one of the elements is error_mark_node, which causes problems. parser.cc has already been fixed to use attr_chainon, but decl.cc has not. Until now. PR c++/96637 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * cp-tree.h (attr_chainon): Declare. * decl.cc (start_decl): Use attr_chainon. (grokdeclarator): Likewise. * parser.cc (cp_parser_statement): No longer static. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/parse/error64.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 1 + gcc/cp/decl.cc | 19 ++++++++++--------- gcc/cp/parser.cc | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C | 4 ++++ 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h index ba986e892b6..d77fd1eb8a9 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h @@ -7235,6 +7235,7 @@ extern void inject_this_parameter (tree, cp_cv_quals); extern location_t defparse_location (tree); extern void maybe_show_extern_c_location (void); extern bool literal_integer_zerop (const_tree); +extern tree attr_chainon (tree, tree); /* in pt.cc */ extern tree canonical_type_parameter (tree); diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc index 381259cb9cf..b1ea838ce8b 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc @@ -5557,7 +5557,7 @@ start_decl (const cp_declarator *declarator, *pushed_scope_p = NULL_TREE; if (prefix_attributes != error_mark_node) - attributes = chainon (attributes, prefix_attributes); + attributes = attr_chainon (attributes, prefix_attributes); decl = grokdeclarator (declarator, declspecs, NORMAL, initialized, &attributes); @@ -12728,9 +12728,10 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, as a whole. */ late_attrs = splice_template_attributes (&attrs, type); returned_attrs = decl_attributes (&type, - chainon (returned_attrs, attrs), + attr_chainon (returned_attrs, + attrs), attr_flags); - returned_attrs = chainon (late_attrs, returned_attrs); + returned_attrs = attr_chainon (late_attrs, returned_attrs); } inner_declarator = declarator->declarator; @@ -12781,8 +12782,8 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, The optional attribute-specifier-seq appertains to the array. */ - returned_attrs = chainon (returned_attrs, - declarator->std_attributes); + returned_attrs = attr_chainon (returned_attrs, + declarator->std_attributes); break; case cdk_function: @@ -13122,9 +13123,9 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, /* transaction_safe applies to the type, but transaction_safe_dynamic applies to the function. */ if (is_attribute_p ("transaction_safe", tx_qual)) - attrs = chainon (attrs, att); + attrs = attr_chainon (attrs, att); else - returned_attrs = chainon (returned_attrs, att); + returned_attrs = attr_chainon (returned_attrs, att); } if (attrs) /* [dcl.fct]/2: @@ -13438,7 +13439,7 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, if (returned_attrs) { if (attrlist) - *attrlist = chainon (returned_attrs, *attrlist); + *attrlist = attr_chainon (returned_attrs, *attrlist); else attrlist = &returned_attrs; } @@ -13451,7 +13452,7 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, /* [dcl.meaning]/1: The optional attribute-specifier-seq following a declarator-id appertains to the entity that is declared. */ if (declarator->std_attributes != error_mark_node) - *attrlist = chainon (*attrlist, declarator->std_attributes); + *attrlist = attr_chainon (*attrlist, declarator->std_attributes); else /* We should have already diagnosed the issue (c++/78344). */ gcc_assert (seen_error ()); diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc index 868b8610d60..62aaccda23d 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc @@ -12557,7 +12557,7 @@ cp_parser_statement (cp_parser* parser, tree in_statement_expr, /* Append ATTR to attribute list ATTRS. */ -static tree +tree attr_chainon (tree attrs, tree attr) { if (attrs == error_mark_node) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..87848a58c27 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +// PR c++/96637 +// { dg-do compile } + +void foo(int[] alignas[1] alignas(1)){} // { dg-error "" } base-commit: 850a9ce8bcca59c7efabcdeeca14c5bd905e8363 -- 2.36.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] 2022-05-25 18:49 ` Marek Polacek @ 2022-05-25 19:51 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jason Merrill @ 2022-05-25 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Polacek; +Cc: GCC Patches On 5/25/22 14:49, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 08:22:22AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On 4/29/22 10:12, Marek Polacek wrote: >>> This patch fixes crashes with invalid attributes. Arguably it could >>> make sense to assert seen_error() too. >> >> So in this testcase we have TREE_CHAIN of a TREE_LIST pointing to >> error_mark_node? Can we avoid that? > > Yes and yes. Sorry, my previous fix was lousy. This one is better: > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? OK, thanks. > -- >8 -- > When chaining attributes, attr_chainon should be used rather than plain > chainon, so that we don't end up with a TREE_LIST where one of the elements > is error_mark_node, which causes problems. parser.cc has already been > fixed to use attr_chainon, but decl.cc has not. Until now. > > PR c++/96637 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * cp-tree.h (attr_chainon): Declare. > * decl.cc (start_decl): Use attr_chainon. > (grokdeclarator): Likewise. > * parser.cc (cp_parser_statement): No longer static. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/parse/error64.C: New test. > --- > gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 1 + > gcc/cp/decl.cc | 19 ++++++++++--------- > gcc/cp/parser.cc | 2 +- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C | 4 ++++ > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h > index ba986e892b6..d77fd1eb8a9 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h > +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h > @@ -7235,6 +7235,7 @@ extern void inject_this_parameter (tree, cp_cv_quals); > extern location_t defparse_location (tree); > extern void maybe_show_extern_c_location (void); > extern bool literal_integer_zerop (const_tree); > +extern tree attr_chainon (tree, tree); > > /* in pt.cc */ > extern tree canonical_type_parameter (tree); > diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc > index 381259cb9cf..b1ea838ce8b 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc > @@ -5557,7 +5557,7 @@ start_decl (const cp_declarator *declarator, > *pushed_scope_p = NULL_TREE; > > if (prefix_attributes != error_mark_node) > - attributes = chainon (attributes, prefix_attributes); > + attributes = attr_chainon (attributes, prefix_attributes); > > decl = grokdeclarator (declarator, declspecs, NORMAL, initialized, > &attributes); > @@ -12728,9 +12728,10 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, > as a whole. */ > late_attrs = splice_template_attributes (&attrs, type); > returned_attrs = decl_attributes (&type, > - chainon (returned_attrs, attrs), > + attr_chainon (returned_attrs, > + attrs), > attr_flags); > - returned_attrs = chainon (late_attrs, returned_attrs); > + returned_attrs = attr_chainon (late_attrs, returned_attrs); > } > > inner_declarator = declarator->declarator; > @@ -12781,8 +12782,8 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, > > The optional attribute-specifier-seq appertains to the > array. */ > - returned_attrs = chainon (returned_attrs, > - declarator->std_attributes); > + returned_attrs = attr_chainon (returned_attrs, > + declarator->std_attributes); > break; > > case cdk_function: > @@ -13122,9 +13123,9 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, > /* transaction_safe applies to the type, but > transaction_safe_dynamic applies to the function. */ > if (is_attribute_p ("transaction_safe", tx_qual)) > - attrs = chainon (attrs, att); > + attrs = attr_chainon (attrs, att); > else > - returned_attrs = chainon (returned_attrs, att); > + returned_attrs = attr_chainon (returned_attrs, att); > } > if (attrs) > /* [dcl.fct]/2: > @@ -13438,7 +13439,7 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, > if (returned_attrs) > { > if (attrlist) > - *attrlist = chainon (returned_attrs, *attrlist); > + *attrlist = attr_chainon (returned_attrs, *attrlist); > else > attrlist = &returned_attrs; > } > @@ -13451,7 +13452,7 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator, > /* [dcl.meaning]/1: The optional attribute-specifier-seq following > a declarator-id appertains to the entity that is declared. */ > if (declarator->std_attributes != error_mark_node) > - *attrlist = chainon (*attrlist, declarator->std_attributes); > + *attrlist = attr_chainon (*attrlist, declarator->std_attributes); > else > /* We should have already diagnosed the issue (c++/78344). */ > gcc_assert (seen_error ()); > diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc > index 868b8610d60..62aaccda23d 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc > +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc > @@ -12557,7 +12557,7 @@ cp_parser_statement (cp_parser* parser, tree in_statement_expr, > > /* Append ATTR to attribute list ATTRS. */ > > -static tree > +tree > attr_chainon (tree attrs, tree attr) > { > if (attrs == error_mark_node) > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..87848a58c27 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/error64.C > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +// PR c++/96637 > +// { dg-do compile } > + > +void foo(int[] alignas[1] alignas(1)){} // { dg-error "" } > > base-commit: 850a9ce8bcca59c7efabcdeeca14c5bd905e8363 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-25 19:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-04-29 14:12 [PATCH] c++: fix ICE on invalid attributes [PR96637] Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 11:41 ` Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 11:59 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni 2022-05-24 12:40 ` Marek Polacek 2022-05-24 12:22 ` Jason Merrill 2022-05-25 18:49 ` Marek Polacek 2022-05-25 19:51 ` Jason Merrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).