public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libcpp: Avoid remapping filenames within directives
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 13:32:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abb7c6d1-65cb-3335-8e3e-4edcf7af103e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220817121534.1825108-2-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>


On 8/17/22 06:15, Richard Purdie via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Code such as:
#include __FILE__
>
> can interact poorly with file-prefix-map options when cross compiling. In
> general you're after to remap filenames for use in target context but the
> local paths should be used to find include files at compile time. Ingoring
> filename remapping for directives is one way to avoid such failures.
>
> libcpp/ChangeLog:
>
>      * macro.cc (_cpp_builtin_macro_text): Don't remap filenames within directives

So I went back and reviewed the old PR which introduced this code.  It 
was actually the Yocto project that got this code in to begin with :-)  
There wasn't really any discussion AFAICT about whether or not to remap 
in directives that I saw in the PR.


ISTM that given the change in behavior, we should probably document that 
we don't remap in directives.  Probably doc/invoke.texi.

With suitable documentation, this should be fine.  It seems like it 
ought to be independent of the first patch in this series which adds 
support for remapping relative paths.


jeff


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-17 12:15 [PATCH 1/2] gcc/file-prefix-map: Allow remapping of relative paths Richard Purdie
2022-08-17 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] libcpp: Avoid remapping filenames within directives Richard Purdie
2022-08-17 14:19   ` Richard Purdie
2022-11-01 19:32   ` Jeff Law [this message]
2022-11-02 10:52     ` Richard Purdie
2022-11-01 19:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] gcc/file-prefix-map: Allow remapping of relative paths Jeff Law
2023-01-19 13:06   ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-20 15:05   ` [PATCH] file-prefix-map: Fix up -f*-prefix-map= [PR108464] Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-23 15:39     ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-10  8:49     ` Patch ping - " Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-10  9:05       ` Richard Biener
2023-03-10 10:14         ` Richard Purdie
2022-11-04  9:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] gcc/file-prefix-map: Allow remapping of relative paths Eric Botcazou
2022-11-04 17:21   ` Richard Purdie
2022-11-07  8:01     ` Eric Botcazou
2022-11-07 16:21       ` Jeff Law
2022-11-07 16:36         ` Eric Botcazou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abb7c6d1-65cb-3335-8e3e-4edcf7af103e@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).