public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
To: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>
Cc: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	Manolis Tsamis <manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu>,
	Jivan Hakobyan <jivanhakobyan9@gmail.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RISC-V: Folding memory for FP + constant case
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:13:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c51bcf6d-57b0-b987-c8ef-347d85f9fafc@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeLtUDEyM+O-W3RNyqdRuqZBksf-bVp3nHo=ULzJGwZO1+4Ng@mail.gmail.com>


On 8/1/23 16:06, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> Very helpful! Looks as if regprop for stack_pointer is now either too
> conservative — or one of our patches is missing in everyone's test
> setup; we'll take a closer look.

FWIW, all 5 of them involve a SH2ADD have SP as source in the fold FP 
case which f-m-o seems to be generating a MV for.

>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 01:03, Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/23 15:07, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>> +Manolis Tsamis
>>>
>>> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 23:56, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
>>> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 8/1/23 13:14, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have some numbers for f-m-o v3 vs this. Attached here (vs. inline to
>>>>> avoid the Thunderbird mangling the test formatting)
>>>> Thanks.  Of particular importance is the leela change.  My recollection
>>>> was that the f-m-o work also picked up that case.  But if my memory is
>>>> faulty (always a possibility), then that shows a clear case where
>>>> Jivan's work picks up a case not handled by Manolis's work.
>>> f-m-o originally targeted (and benefited) the leela-case.  I wonder if
>>> other optimizations/changes over the last year interfere with this and
>>> what needs to be changed to accomodate this... looks like we need to
>>> revisit against trunk.
>>>
>>> Philipp.
>>>
>>>> And on the other direction we can see that deepsjeng isn't helped by
>>>> Jivan's work, but is helped by Manolis's new pass.
>>>>
>>>> I'd always hoped/expected we'd have cases where one patch clearly helped
>>>> over the other.  While the .25% to .37% improvements for the three most
>>>> impacted benchmarks doesn't move the needle much across the whole suite
>>>> they do add up over time.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>> I took a quick look at Leela, the significant difference is from
>> additional insns with SP not getting propagated.
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>>      231b6:    mv    a4,sp
>>      231b8:    sh2add    a5,a5,a4
>>
>> vs.
>>
>>      1e824:    sh2add    a5,a5,sp
>>
>> There are 5 such instances which more or less make up for the delta.
>>
>> -Vineet
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-01 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-12 20:59 Jivan Hakobyan
2023-07-15  6:16 ` Jeff Law
2023-07-25 11:24   ` Jivan Hakobyan
2023-07-26  3:31     ` Jeff Law
2023-08-01 19:14       ` Vineet Gupta
2023-08-01 20:16         ` Jivan Hakobyan
2023-08-01 21:55         ` Jeff Law
2023-08-01 22:07           ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-08-01 23:03             ` Vineet Gupta
2023-08-01 23:06               ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-08-01 23:13                 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2023-08-01 23:27                   ` Jeff Law
2023-08-01 23:38                     ` Vineet Gupta
2023-08-01 23:52                       ` Jeff Law
2023-08-04  9:52                         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-08-04 16:23                           ` Jeff Law
2023-08-05  9:27                             ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-08-01 23:22                 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-01 23:28                   ` Vineet Gupta
2023-08-01 23:21               ` Jeff Law
2023-08-09 19:31 ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c51bcf6d-57b0-b987-c8ef-347d85f9fafc@rivosinc.com \
    --to=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=jivanhakobyan9@gmail.com \
    --cc=manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).