From: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
To: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
Manolis Tsamis <manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu>
Cc: Jivan Hakobyan <jivanhakobyan9@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RISC-V: Folding memory for FP + constant case
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:03:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73dc8b97-7a7b-d9a0-2e8e-b4a5aaa3ee93@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeLtUACTGKF-o_Qf4yfNUSXiHv1fBJ6n3ce+TjUuQNx8GWRiw@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/1/23 15:07, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> +Manolis Tsamis
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 23:56, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/23 13:14, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>
>>> I have some numbers for f-m-o v3 vs this. Attached here (vs. inline to
>>> avoid the Thunderbird mangling the test formatting)
>> Thanks. Of particular importance is the leela change. My recollection
>> was that the f-m-o work also picked up that case. But if my memory is
>> faulty (always a possibility), then that shows a clear case where
>> Jivan's work picks up a case not handled by Manolis's work.
> f-m-o originally targeted (and benefited) the leela-case. I wonder if
> other optimizations/changes over the last year interfere with this and
> what needs to be changed to accomodate this... looks like we need to
> revisit against trunk.
>
> Philipp.
>
>> And on the other direction we can see that deepsjeng isn't helped by
>> Jivan's work, but is helped by Manolis's new pass.
>>
>> I'd always hoped/expected we'd have cases where one patch clearly helped
>> over the other. While the .25% to .37% improvements for the three most
>> impacted benchmarks doesn't move the needle much across the whole suite
>> they do add up over time.
>>
>> Jeff
I took a quick look at Leela, the significant difference is from
additional insns with SP not getting propagated.
e.g.
231b6: mv a4,sp
231b8: sh2add a5,a5,a4
vs.
1e824: sh2add a5,a5,sp
There are 5 such instances which more or less make up for the delta.
-Vineet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-12 20:59 Jivan Hakobyan
2023-07-15 6:16 ` Jeff Law
2023-07-25 11:24 ` Jivan Hakobyan
2023-07-26 3:31 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-01 19:14 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-08-01 20:16 ` Jivan Hakobyan
2023-08-01 21:55 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-01 22:07 ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-08-01 23:03 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2023-08-01 23:06 ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-08-01 23:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-08-01 23:27 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-01 23:38 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-08-01 23:52 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-04 9:52 ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-08-04 16:23 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-05 9:27 ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-08-01 23:22 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-01 23:28 ` Vineet Gupta
2023-08-01 23:21 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-09 19:31 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73dc8b97-7a7b-d9a0-2e8e-b4a5aaa3ee93@rivosinc.com \
--to=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=jivanhakobyan9@gmail.com \
--cc=manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).