* [PATCH] doc: -falign-functions doesn't override the __attribute__((align(N)))
@ 2022-10-07 13:49 Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-10 6:07 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2022-10-07 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches, hubicka, richard.guenther; +Cc: Palmer Dabbelt
I found this when reading the documentation for Kito's recent patch.
From the discussion it sounds like this is the desired behavior, so
let's document it.
gcc/doc/ChangeLog
* invoke.texi (-falign-functions): Mention __align__
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 2a9ea3455f6..8326a60dcf1 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -13136,7 +13136,9 @@ effective only in combination with @option{-fstrict-aliasing}.
Align the start of functions to the next power-of-two greater than or
equal to @var{n}, skipping up to @var{m}-1 bytes. This ensures that at
least the first @var{m} bytes of the function can be fetched by the CPU
-without crossing an @var{n}-byte alignment boundary.
+without crossing an @var{n}-byte alignment boundary. This does not override
+functions that otherwise specify their own alignment constraints, such as via
+an alignment attribute.
If @var{m} is not specified, it defaults to @var{n}.
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] doc: -falign-functions doesn't override the __attribute__((align(N)))
2022-10-07 13:49 [PATCH] doc: -falign-functions doesn't override the __attribute__((align(N))) Palmer Dabbelt
@ 2022-10-10 6:07 ` Richard Biener
2022-10-11 21:02 ` Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2022-10-10 6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Palmer Dabbelt; +Cc: gcc-patches, hubicka
On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 3:50 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> I found this when reading the documentation for Kito's recent patch.
> From the discussion it sounds like this is the desired behavior, so
> let's document it.
Maybe also mention that the alignment doesn't apply to functions
optimized for size?
> gcc/doc/ChangeLog
>
> * invoke.texi (-falign-functions): Mention __align__
> ---
> gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> index 2a9ea3455f6..8326a60dcf1 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> @@ -13136,7 +13136,9 @@ effective only in combination with @option{-fstrict-aliasing}.
> Align the start of functions to the next power-of-two greater than or
> equal to @var{n}, skipping up to @var{m}-1 bytes. This ensures that at
> least the first @var{m} bytes of the function can be fetched by the CPU
> -without crossing an @var{n}-byte alignment boundary.
> +without crossing an @var{n}-byte alignment boundary. This does not override
> +functions that otherwise specify their own alignment constraints, such as via
> +an alignment attribute.
>
> If @var{m} is not specified, it defaults to @var{n}.
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] doc: -falign-functions doesn't override the __attribute__((align(N)))
2022-10-10 6:07 ` Richard Biener
@ 2022-10-11 21:02 ` Palmer Dabbelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Palmer Dabbelt @ 2022-10-11 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: richard.guenther; +Cc: gcc-patches, hubicka
On Sun, 09 Oct 2022 23:07:21 PDT (-0700), richard.guenther@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 3:50 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> I found this when reading the documentation for Kito's recent patch.
>> From the discussion it sounds like this is the desired behavior, so
>> let's document it.
>
> Maybe also mention that the alignment doesn't apply to functions
> optimized for size?
Oops, I guess that was the whole point of the discussion ;). I sent a
v2, which also mentions -Os but not sure we need to do that explicitly.
>
>> gcc/doc/ChangeLog
>>
>> * invoke.texi (-falign-functions): Mention __align__
>> ---
>> gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> index 2a9ea3455f6..8326a60dcf1 100644
>> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> @@ -13136,7 +13136,9 @@ effective only in combination with @option{-fstrict-aliasing}.
>> Align the start of functions to the next power-of-two greater than or
>> equal to @var{n}, skipping up to @var{m}-1 bytes. This ensures that at
>> least the first @var{m} bytes of the function can be fetched by the CPU
>> -without crossing an @var{n}-byte alignment boundary.
>> +without crossing an @var{n}-byte alignment boundary. This does not override
>> +functions that otherwise specify their own alignment constraints, such as via
>> +an alignment attribute.
>>
>> If @var{m} is not specified, it defaults to @var{n}.
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-11 21:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-07 13:49 [PATCH] doc: -falign-functions doesn't override the __attribute__((align(N))) Palmer Dabbelt
2022-10-10 6:07 ` Richard Biener
2022-10-11 21:02 ` Palmer Dabbelt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).