[PATCH] testsuite: arm: fix arm_movt cut&pasto

[Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>]

I got spurious fails of tests that required arm_thumb1_movt_ok on a
target cpu that did not support movt.  Looking into it, I found the
arm_movt property to have been cut&pasted into various procs that
checked for different properties.  They shouldn't share the same test
results cache entry, so I'm changing their prop names.

Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested on arm-eabi with default
cpu on trunk, and with tms570 on gcc-13.  Ok to install?


for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

	* lib/target-supports.exp
	(check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_cbz_ok): Fix prop name
	cut&pasto.
	(check_effective_target_arm_arch_v6t2_hw_ok): Likewise.
---
 gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 240a3815d38a7..e3519207d0e61 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -5610,7 +5610,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_movt_ok {} {
 
 proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_cbz_ok {} {
     if [check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_ok] {
-	return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_movt object {
+	return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_cbz object {
 	    int
 	    foo (void)
 	    {
@@ -5627,7 +5627,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_cbz_ok {} {
 
 proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_v6t2_hw_ok {} {
     if [check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_ok] {
-	return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_movt object {
+	return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_v6t2_hw object {
 	    int
 	    main (void)
 	    {

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker            https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
   Free Software Activist                   GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive