Re: libstdc++/3113

Re: libstdc++/3113

[Benjamin Kosnik]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3113; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: "Simpson, Kenny" <Kenny.Simpson@gs.com>
Cc: "'bkoz@gcc.gnu.org'" <bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>,
        "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
        "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
        "'kenny.simpson@gs.com'" <Kenny.Simpson@gs.com>,
        "'theonetruekenny@yahoo.com'" <theonetruekenny@yahoo.com>,
        "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3113
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:55:26 -0700 (PDT)

 this is resolved as checked in. My patch in the comment to this bug 
 report is screwed, but I caught both before check in.
 
 Yay for regression testing!
 
 see
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg00698.html

Re: libstdc++/3113

[Simpson, Kenny]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3113; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Simpson, Kenny" <Kenny.Simpson@gs.com>
To: "'bkoz@gcc.gnu.org'" <bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"'kenny.simpson@gs.com'" <Kenny.Simpson@gs.com>,
	"'theonetruekenny@yahoo.com'" <theonetruekenny@yahoo.com>,
	"'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3113
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:17:00 -0400

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3113&database=gcc
 
 Darn, Benjamin fixed it before I could send off my nice pretty report, but I
 may have found something else.
 The first version should not have compiled without a return type.
 The online compiler spits out an error for this case.
 "9: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `operator()' with no type"
 Does 3.1 not?
 Should I file a separate bug report?
 
 -Kenny