public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-06-12 16:06 theonetruekenny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: theonetruekenny @ 2001-06-12 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats; +Cc: kenny.simpson
>Number: 3149
>Category: libstdc++
>Synopsis: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Tue Jun 12 16:06:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: theonetruekenny@yahoo.com
>Release: 20010605 cvs
>Organization:
>Environment:
source
>Description:
see:
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#275
>How-To-Repeat:
observe include/bits/local_facets.h line 584.
Note that the version for float& already exists on line 630.
>Fix:
remove lines 584-588 inclusive.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-12-05 14:46 bkoz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bkoz @ 2001-12-05 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bkoz; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3149; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kenny.simpson@gs.com, theonetruekenny@yahoo.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Date: 5 Dec 2001 22:36:23 -0000
Synopsis: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 5 14:36:22 2001
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3149&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-12-05 14:36 bkoz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bkoz @ 2001-12-05 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bkoz, gcc-bugs, gcc-gnats, gcc-prs, kenny.simpson, theonetruekenny
Synopsis: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 5 14:36:22 2001
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3149&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-12-01 18:56 Benjamin Kosnik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2001-12-01 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bkoz; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3149; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: Kenny Simpson <theonetruekenny@yahoo.com>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
kenny.simpson@gs.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 18:46:23 -0800 (PST)
> Cool. Is the bool overload for get and do_get a gcc-ism?
No, there has to be a bool overload in case boolalpha == true, capice? I
believe the current code is standards-conforming, especially WRT the
num_get DR's.
See:
22.2.2.1 - Template class num_get [lib.locale.num.get]
-benjamin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-12-01 14:26 Kenny Simpson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kenny Simpson @ 2001-12-01 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bkoz; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3149; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kenny Simpson <theonetruekenny@yahoo.com>
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kenny.simpson@gs.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 14:17:14 -0800 (PST)
Cool. Is the bool overload for get and do_get a
gcc-ism? If so, should it be in and #ifdef like the
long long and unsigned long long cases?
-Kenny
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-11-23 1:55 bkoz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bkoz @ 2001-11-23 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bkoz; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3149; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, kenny.simpson@gs.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
theonetruekenny@yahoo.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Date: 1 Dec 2001 02:33:15 -0000
Synopsis: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz
Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 30 18:33:15 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Mine.
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 30 18:33:15 2001
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in the recent numeric work. Please take a look at the gcc 3.1 sources and let me know what you think.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3149&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-11-23 1:47 bkoz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: bkoz @ 2001-11-23 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bkoz, gcc-bugs, gcc-gnats, gcc-prs, kenny.simpson, nobody,
theonetruekenny
Synopsis: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz
Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 30 18:33:15 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Mine.
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 30 18:33:15 2001
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in the recent numeric work. Please take a look at the gcc 3.1 sources and let me know what you think.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3149&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-07-05 14:36 Simpson, Kenny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Simpson, Kenny @ 2001-07-05 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3149; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Simpson, Kenny" <Kenny.Simpson@gs.com>
To: 'Phil Edwards' <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>,
theonetruekenny@yahoo.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 17:27:49 -0400
Possibly an old version of 118?
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#118
-Kenny
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Edwards [ mailto:pedwards@disaster.jaj.com ]
Those lines are contained within a _GLIBCPP_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS block,
but there is no comment saying which defect. I would want to know
what problem those lines are supposed to solve before removing them.
Phil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
@ 2001-07-05 14:06 Phil Edwards
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Phil Edwards @ 2001-07-05 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3149; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: theonetruekenny@yahoo.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, kenny.simpson@gs.com
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 17:05:05 -0400
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:00:22PM -0000, theonetruekenny@yahoo.com wrote:
> >How-To-Repeat:
> observe include/bits/local_facets.h line 584.
> Note that the version for float& already exists on line 630.
> >Fix:
> remove lines 584-588 inclusive.
Those lines are contained within a _GLIBCPP_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS block,
but there is no comment saying which defect. I would want to know
what problem those lines are supposed to solve before removing them.
(This should probably be Benjamin's call, since I know little about the
locale/facet implementation.)
Phil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-05 22:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-06-12 16:06 libstdc++/3149: Ready 275: Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads theonetruekenny
2001-07-05 14:06 Phil Edwards
2001-07-05 14:36 Simpson, Kenny
2001-11-23 1:47 bkoz
2001-11-23 1:55 bkoz
2001-12-01 14:26 Kenny Simpson
2001-12-01 18:56 Benjamin Kosnik
2001-12-05 14:36 bkoz
2001-12-05 14:46 bkoz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).