public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/5797: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108"
@ 2002-03-02 18:43 rodrigc
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2002-03-02 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, traveler

Synopsis: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108"

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar  2 18:43:39 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    No, you did not include everything.  Read: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
    and submit preprocessed source of your bug.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5797


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/5797: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108"
@ 2002-03-03 10:15 rodrigc
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2002-03-03 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, traveler

Synopsis: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108"

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sun Mar  3 10:15:52 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Apparently fixed in gcc 3.1.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5797


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/5797: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108"
@ 2002-03-03 10:14 rodrigc
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2002-03-03 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, traveler

Synopsis: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108"

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sun Mar  3 10:14:36 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    I can reproduce your error
    (I need to change the typedef for size_t from "long unsigned int" to "unsigned int" in order to compile under Linux).
    
    With gcc 3.1 20020217 (experimental), the code compiles, but I get the following warnings:
    function.h:275: warning: `typename ArithmeticFunction<Type>::Overflow' is
       implicitly a typename
    function.h:275: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the
       documentation for details
    function.h:275: warning: `typename ArithmeticFunction<Type>::Underflow' is
       implicitly a typename
    function.h:275: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the
       documentation for details
    function.h:285: warning: `typename ArithmeticFunction<Type>::Overflow' is
       implicitly a typename
    function.h:285: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the
       documentation for details
    function.h:285: warning: `typename ArithmeticFunction<Type>::Underflow' is
       implicitly a typename
    function.h:285: warning: implicit typename is deprecated, please see the
       documentation for details
    
    
    I can get rid of the warnings with the patch which I
    have attached to this PR, jee.patch.txt, 
    but it still will not compile with gcc 3.0.4:
    
    
    
    So, while this still looks like a problem in gcc 3.0.4,
    it looks fixed in gcc 3.1 20020217 (experimental).

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5797


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-03 18:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-02 18:43 c++/5797: "GCC 3.04 produces internal error 108" rodrigc
2002-03-03 10:14 rodrigc
2002-03-03 10:15 rodrigc

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).