public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: target/4959: gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers
@ 2002-06-20 16:18 rth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rth @ 2002-06-20 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edward.connell, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, uweigand

Synopsis: gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->uweigand
Responsible-Changed-By: rth
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jun 20 16:12:37 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Didn't you fix something like this for 3.1?

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4959


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: target/4959: gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers
@ 2002-06-21  5:13 uweigand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: uweigand @ 2002-06-21  5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edward.connell, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, uweigand

Synopsis: gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: uweigand
State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 21 05:08:43 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-06/msg00999.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4959


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* target/4959: gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers
@ 2001-11-21  8:36 edward.connell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: edward.connell @ 2001-11-21  8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats


>Number:         4959
>Category:       target
>Synopsis:       gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Nov 27 10:16:01 PST 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     edward.connell@sas.com
>Release:        gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
>Organization:
>Environment:
Linux/s390 native and cross-build
>Description:
gcc fails to compile a file with more than 1024 function pointers with "/var/tmp/cc6ojHFY.s:2073: Error: operand out of range (4096 not between 0 and 4095)".  Gcc is trying to use a relative offset but the distance gets too large.  Imagine the following with N=1025.

****************
int i0();
int i1();
int i2();

int main() {
 int (*funcs[3])();

 funcs[0]=i0;
 funcs[1]=i1;
 funcs[2]=i2;
 return 0;
}
**************

This program will generate a .c file which fails to compile on s390.

**************
#define NUM 1025

int main()
{
 int i;

 for (i=0; i<NUM; i++) {
   printf("int i%d();\n", i);
 }

 printf("\nint main() {\n int (*funcs[%d])();\n\n", NUM);

 for (i=0; i<NUM; i++) {
   printf(" funcs[%d]=i%d;\n", i, i);
 }

 printf(" return 0;\n}\n");

 return 0;
}
**************
>How-To-Repeat:
#define NUM 1025

int main()
{
 int i;

 for (i=0; i<NUM; i++) {
   printf("int i%d();\n", i);
 }

 printf("\nint main() {\n int (*funcs[%d])();\n\n", NUM);

 for (i=0; i<NUM; i++) {
   printf(" funcs[%d]=i%d;\n", i, i);
 }

 printf(" return 0;\n}\n");

 return 0;
}
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-21 12:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-20 16:18 target/4959: gcc/s390 fails with more than 1024 function pointers rth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-21  5:13 uweigand
2001-11-21  8:36 edward.connell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).