public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/4131: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
@ 2002-10-06 20:08 rth
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: rth @ 2002-10-06 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, k_satoda, nobody
Synopsis: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: rth
State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 6 20:08:19 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Because it has a non-trivial constructor. This could
probably still be optimized, but it's up to the front end
to tell us that; changed to category c++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4131
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-07 3:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-06 20:08 c++/4131: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section? rth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).