public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/2112
@ 2002-11-22 15:46 Nathan Sidwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2002-11-22 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/2112; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Cc: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/2112
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:25:23 +0000
Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> Nathan,
> you marked this report as confirmed. How strongly do you feel about this?
> I think the message I get is actually not wrong, so at the most I would
> concede to make it a feature-request and mark it as that (and maybe put it
> in suspended mode?). I agree that the message 2.95 (the lower one below)
I don't feel strongly. an analyzed feature request would be fin.
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/2112
@ 2002-11-21 2:56 Wolfgang Bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2002-11-21 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/2112; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/2112
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:34:35 -0600 (CST)
Nathan,
you marked this report as confirmed. How strongly do you feel about this?
I think the message I get is actually not wrong, so at the most I would
concede to make it a feature-request and mark it as that (and maybe put it
in suspended mode?). I agree that the message 2.95 (the lower one below)
is more accurate, but I think the one we now get is also ok.
Regards
Wolfgang
tmp/g> cat y.cc
struct X;
void f (int &);
void f (X);
void g () {f(1); };
tmp/g> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.3x-pre/bin/c++ -c y.cc
y.cc: In function `void g()':
y.cc:5: error: no matching function for call to `f(int)'
y.cc:3: error: candidates are: void f(int&)
y.cc:4: error: void f(X)
tmp/g> c++ -c y.cc
y.cc: In function `void g()':
y.cc:5: initialization of non-const reference type `int &'
y.cc:5: from rvalue of type `int'
y.cc:3: in passing argument 1 of `f(int &)'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/2112
@ 2001-04-27 8:16 nathan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: nathan @ 2001-04-27 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/2112; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, richarda@ixla.com.au
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/2112
Date: 27 Apr 2001 15:07:57 -0000
Synopsis: Diagnostic message misleading for binding r-value to non-const reference
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 27 11:07:56 2001
State-Changed-Why:
confirmed as a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2112&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-18 12:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-22 15:46 c++/2112 Nathan Sidwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-21 2:56 c++/2112 Wolfgang Bangerth
2001-04-27 8:16 c++/2112 nathan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).