public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: bootstrap/3776: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms
@ 2002-11-27 10:26 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2002-11-27 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, rob
Old Synopsis: Can't build for sh-hms
New Synopsis: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 19 18:12:53 2002
State-Changed-Why:
This is a rather old bootstrap failure report, and gcc3.0
is no longer supported. Can you please check whether you
can build a newer version of gcc on your platform and let
us know about your findings?
Thanks
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3776
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3776: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms
@ 2002-11-28 15:21 Rob Savoye
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rob Savoye @ 2002-11-28 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3776; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Rob Savoye <rob@welcomehome.org>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3776: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:11:37 -0700
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:12:54AM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
> Old Synopsis: Can't build for sh-hms
> New Synopsis: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 19 18:12:53 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> This is a rather old bootstrap failure report, and gcc3.0
> is no longer supported. Can you please check whether you
> can build a newer version of gcc on your platform and let
> us know about your findings?
>
> Thanks
> W.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3776
Yep, it's fixed in the 3.2 release. This is so old, I forgot about it...
In general, the cross development support in 3.2 is way better (and to
be expected) than in 3.0.
- rob -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3776: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms
@ 2002-11-28 15:16 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2002-11-28 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, rob
Synopsis: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 20 09:23:55 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Closed on request of submitter.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3776
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-20 17:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-27 10:26 bootstrap/3776: [sh-hms] Can't build for sh-hms bangerth
2002-11-28 15:16 bangerth
2002-11-28 15:21 Rob Savoye
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).