Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls

Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls

[bangerth]

Synopsis: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 20 18:53:43 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    No feedback in a long time. Comment to the patch cited
    in audit trail indicates that the problem has been fixed
    in 3.1 anyway.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3947

Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

The following reply was made to PR target/3947; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Tim Small <tim@digitalbrain.com>
Cc: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, simong@oz.agile.tv
Subject: Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:13:51 -0500

 On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:51:15AM +0000, Tim Small wrote:
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3947
 > 
 > This bug should prob be reclassified as non-architecture dependent, as 
 > we are seeing this bug (or at least one with the same effect) on i386. 
 > Is it worth us trying to whittle down to the smallest code snippet 
 > necessary to reproduce this (we are working with a fairly large closed 
 > source base so this may be quite time consuming - no problem doing it, 
 > but wanted to check if it is actually going to be useful?).
 
 A patch for what I believe was the same problem was posted to
 gcc-patches and received no comment.  See:
   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-02/msg00573.html
 
 
 -- 
 Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
 MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls

[Craig Rodrigues]

The following reply was made to PR target/3947; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: Tim Small <tim@digitalbrain.com>
Cc: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, simong@oz.agile.tv
Subject: Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:00:41 -0500

 On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:51:15AM +0000, Tim Small wrote:
 >  Is it worth us trying to whittle down to the smallest code snippet 
 > necessary to reproduce this (we are working with a fairly large closed 
 > source base so this may be quite time consuming - no problem doing it, 
 > but wanted to check if it is actually going to be useful?).
 
 That would be useful.
 -- 
 Craig Rodrigues        
 rodrigc@mediaone.net          

Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls

[Tim Small]

The following reply was made to PR target/3947; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tim Small <tim@digitalbrain.com>
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, simong@oz.agile.tv
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/3947: [MIPS] MIPS multiple inheritance - thunk causes two destructor calls
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:51:15 +0000

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3947
 
 This bug should prob be reclassified as non-architecture dependent, as 
 we are seeing this bug (or at least one with the same effect) on i386. 
  Is it worth us trying to whittle down to the smallest code snippet 
 necessary to reproduce this (we are working with a fairly large closed 
 source base so this may be quite time consuming - no problem doing it, 
 but wanted to check if it is actually going to be useful?).
 
 Cheers,
 
 Tim.