public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c/7649: gcc generate a wrong code
@ 2003-02-23 20:51 neroden
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: neroden @ 2003-02-23 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, lium, nobody

Synopsis: gcc generate a wrong code

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: neroden
State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 23 20:51:02 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    You guessed it -- no feedback > 3 mo.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7649


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: c/7649: gcc generate a wrong code
@ 2002-10-25 15:46 Joe Buck
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2002-10-25 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c/7649; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: lium@i-net.com.cn, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/7649: gcc generate a wrong code
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:36:40 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7649
 
 Hello,
 
 The bug report you filed does not describe what problem you are seeing, 
 and it
 refers to an attached example but there is no attachment.  Without 
 specifics it
 is not possible to fix bugs.
 
 Thanks,
 Joe
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: c/7649: gcc generate a wrong code
@ 2002-10-25 15:34 jbuck
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jbuck @ 2002-10-25 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, lium, nobody

Synopsis: gcc generate a wrong code

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: jbuck
State-Changed-When: Fri Oct 25 15:34:58 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    No example, no description of the bug.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7649


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* c/7649: gcc generate a wrong code
@ 2002-08-20  7:16 lium
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lium @ 2002-08-20  7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats


>Number:         7649
>Category:       c
>Synopsis:       gcc generate a wrong code
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          wrong-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Aug 20 07:16:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Start Network, inc.
>Release:        gcc v3.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
cygwin
>Description:
 *
 * hi, 
 * 	i'm a programmer for a embedded system project, 
 * i am using the gcc as the compiler. my host is x86, and target machine
 * is ARM.
 * the follwing is my bug report. would you tell me is it a bug, and if it 
 * was a bug, how can i avoid facing it.
 * thanks in advanced.
 *
 * GCC BUG REPORT
 * when i complid the following source code, 
 * the gcc complier will generate a big bug, 
 * which may cause the local variable len get a invalid value.
 * it is terrible for me. 
 * i found it when i disassemble the obj file.
 * So, you can disamble the .o file and you will touch the bug.
>How-To-Repeat:
see the attached file's comment
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-23 20:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-23 20:51 c/7649: gcc generate a wrong code neroden
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-25 15:46 Joe Buck
2002-10-25 15:34 jbuck
2002-08-20  7:16 lium

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).