public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c/9853: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
@ 2003-02-26 19:26 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-02-26 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, mas, nobody
Old Synopsis: gcc 3.2 miscompiles non constant structure initializer
New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 26 19:26:00 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Behavior confirmed. If the code is legal, then this is
a regression from 3.0.4, which yielded the expected
result. 3.2, 3.3 and mainline all print something
unexpected.
Someone with standard knowledge should verify what is
expected behavior here.
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9853
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c/9853: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
@ 2003-03-11 22:56 Glen Nakamura
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Glen Nakamura @ 2003-03-11 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/9853; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:47:31 -1000
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9853
Also, as a note to anyone looking at this PR, notice how many unnecessary
temporaries are used in the test case. The generated code is quite awful.
A quick search returned PR opt/9540 relating to this issue:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9540
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c/9853: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
@ 2003-03-11 21:36 Glen Nakamura
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Glen Nakamura @ 2003-03-11 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/9853; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
mas@systems.caltech.edu
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:27:44 +0000
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9853
After looking at the test case for PR c/9853, I believe the problem deals
with assigning and freeing temp slots while emitting the initializer.
In this case, the temp slot created by assign_temp in expand_expr (expr.c:7087)
is freed early by free_temp_slots in expand_decl_init (stmt.c:4061) and then
overwritten when a new temp slot is allocated.
I don't really understand how the different temp slot functions are intended
to be used, but the call to free_temp_slots at the end of expand_decl_init
didn't make sense to me because expand_assignment manages its own temp slots
using the push/free/pop functions. Anyway, the following patch fixes the
problem (bootstrapped and regtested on i686-pc-linux-gnu 3.3 branch):
* stmt.c (expand_decl_init): Remove redundant call to free_temp_slots.
diff -Nru3p gcc-3.3.orig/gcc/stmt.c gcc-3.3/gcc/stmt.c
--- gcc-3.3.orig/gcc/stmt.c 2003-02-22 10:04:10.000000000 +0000
+++ gcc-3.3/gcc/stmt.c 2003-02-22 10:04:10.000000000 +0000
@@ -4055,10 +4055,6 @@ expand_decl_init (decl)
/* Don't let the initialization count as "using" the variable. */
TREE_USED (decl) = was_used;
-
- /* Free any temporaries we made while initializing the decl. */
- preserve_temp_slots (NULL_RTX);
- free_temp_slots ();
}
/* CLEANUP is an expression to be executed at exit from this binding contour;
Although the above patch fixes the problem, perhaps changing the keep argument
to the assign_temp in expand_expr would be safer? I'll let someone who
understands the temp slot functions better decide.
diff -Nru10p gcc-3.3.orig/gcc/expr.c gcc-3.3/gcc/expr.c
--- gcc-3.3.orig/gcc/expr.c 2003-03-05 00:14:33.000000000 +0000
+++ gcc-3.3/gcc/expr.c 2003-03-05 00:14:33.000000000 +0000
@@ -7082,21 +7082,21 @@ expand_expr (exp, target, tmode, modifie
/* Handle calls that pass values in multiple non-contiguous
locations. The Irix 6 ABI has examples of this. */
if (target == 0 || ! safe_from_p (target, exp, 1)
|| GET_CODE (target) == PARALLEL
|| modifier == EXPAND_STACK_PARM)
target
= assign_temp (build_qualified_type (type,
(TYPE_QUALS (type)
| (TREE_READONLY (exp)
* TYPE_QUAL_CONST))),
- 0, TREE_ADDRESSABLE (exp), 1);
+ 1, TREE_ADDRESSABLE (exp), 1);
store_constructor (exp, target, 0, int_expr_size (exp));
return target;
}
case INDIRECT_REF:
{
tree exp1 = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0);
tree index;
tree string = string_constant (exp1, &index);
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="testcase.c"
/* PR c/9853 */
/* Contributed by Srinivas Aji <mas@systems.caltech.edu> */
extern void abort (void);
struct box_group
{
int a, b, c, d;
};
struct test_struct
{
int id;
struct box_group elem1;
struct box_group elem2;
};
int my_zero (void)
{
return 0;
}
int main ()
{
struct test_struct x = {
.id = my_zero (),
.elem1 = (struct box_group) {1, 2, 3, 4},
.elem2 = (struct box_group) {5, 6, 7, 8},
};
if ((x.id != 0) || (x.elem1.a != 1) || (x.elem1.b != 2)
|| (x.elem1.c != 3) || (x.elem1.d != 4) || (x.elem2.a != 5)
|| (x.elem2.b != 6) || (x.elem2.c != 7) || (x.elem2.d != 8))
abort ();
return 0;
}
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-11 22:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-26 19:26 c/9853: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer bangerth
2003-03-11 21:36 Glen Nakamura
2003-03-11 22:56 Glen Nakamura
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).