public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
@ 2003-03-12 10:14 ebotcazou
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou @ 2003-03-12 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ebotcazou, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, snyder

Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: ebotcazou
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 12 10:14:30 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9928


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
@ 2003-03-12  0:16 Steven Bosscher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-03-12  0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ebotcazou; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c/9928; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	snyder@fnal.gov, ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:10:20 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9928
 
 Patch pending: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg00972.html
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
@ 2003-03-11 14:04 steven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: steven @ 2003-03-11 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ebotcazou, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, snyder

Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->ebotcazou
Responsible-Changed-By: steven
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 11 14:04:39 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    per his request

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9928


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
@ 2003-03-11 13:56 Eric Botcazou
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2003-03-11 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c/9928; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
 nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
 snyder@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:53:28 +0100

 > This PR was introduced with Eric's patch that fixed another ICE (for
 > c/7741): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00641.html
 
 Thanks for spotting this! Please assign the PR to me.
 
 -- 
 Eric Botcazou


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
@ 2003-03-11 13:36 Steven Bosscher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-03-11 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c/9928; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr, snyder@fnal.gov
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:28:18 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9928
 
 This PR was introduced with Eric's patch that fixed another ICE (for 
 c/7741):
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00641.html
 
 So we've exchanged one ICE for another :-)
 
 Greetz
 Steven
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration
@ 2003-03-03 23:37 bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-03-03 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, snyder

Old Synopsis: ICE on duplicate enum declaration
New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Mar  3 23:37:28 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed. With 3.2, we just get an error:
    g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.2.2-pre/bin/gcc -c x.c
    x.c:2: conflicting types for `CODES'
    x.c:1: previous declaration of `CODES'
    
    3.3 bails out, which has of course the same source as 3.4
    ICEing:
    g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.3-pre/bin/gcc -c x.c
    x.c:2: error: conflicting types for `CODES'
    x.c:1: error: previous declaration of `CODES'
    x.c:2: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
    
    g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/gcc -c x.c
    x.c:2: error: conflicting types for `CODES'
    x.c:1: error: previous declaration of `CODES'
    x.c:2: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
    
    Since 3.2 did not ICE, this is a regression.
    
    W.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9928


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-12 10:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-12 10:14 c/9928: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE on duplicate enum declaration ebotcazou
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-12  0:16 Steven Bosscher
2003-03-11 14:04 steven
2003-03-11 13:56 Eric Botcazou
2003-03-11 13:36 Steven Bosscher
2003-03-03 23:37 bangerth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).