public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
@ 2003-03-13 0:26 Benjamin Kosnik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2003-03-13 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdr; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/1773; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: neroden@twcny.rr.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Jens.Maurer@gmx.net, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@gcc.gnu.org, pme@sourceware.cygnus.com,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:23:59 -0600
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:32:03 -0500
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
>This is a very old report. What's the status now? It was suspended because
>the standard conforming value for __cplusplus broke libstdc++-v3 on many
>platforms. libstdc++-v3 and the C++ front end have both undergone dramatic
>changes and improvements. Can this be fixed now?
Sadly, this can't be fixed at the moment, at least on most platforms.
For cross compilers using newlib, this was fixed some time back with the
--enable-headers=c work done at the time of the QNX port. That is not
the default configuration, however.
One of the things blocking this is hardware, ie real access to
up-to-date sun hardware with sunpro tools so I can see what is going on.
The other issue is time: I don't have enough of it, and this is
something I consider a lower priority than other issues. There were some
patches in glibc-2.3.x that went in that may allow a more elegant
solution for linux, but that work is not finished.
best,
benjamin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
@ 2003-03-12 21:36 Nathanael Nerode
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2003-03-12 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdr; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/1773; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
To: bkoz@redhat.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Jens.Maurer@gmx.net,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@gcc.gnu.org,
pme@sourceware.cygnus.com, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:32:03 -0500
This is a very old report. What's the status now? It was suspended because
the standard conforming value for __cplusplus broke libstdc++-v3 on many
platforms. libstdc++-v3 and the C++ front end have both undergone dramatic
changes and improvements. Can this be fixed now?
--Nathanael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-13 0:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-13 0:26 libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L Benjamin Kosnik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-12 21:36 Nathanael Nerode
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).