public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction (fwd)
@ 2003-03-27 15:25 Wolfgang Bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-03-27 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10098; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction (fwd)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:53:29 -0600 (CST)

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:40:53 -0600
 From: Daniel Frankowski <dfrankow@winternet.com>
 To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
 Cc: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>
 Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction
 
 By the way, only a couple of days later, using the Borland C++
 compiler to try to compile the same thing, my computer self-immolated.
 
 I got a new CPU, motherboard, case, etc., and I am having much better
 success compiling now.
 
 Thanks again for your help.
 
 Dan
 
 On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 07:32:41AM -0600, Daniel Frankowski wrote:
 > Sadly, closing it seems appropriate.  Thanks for your help.
 > 
 > Dan
 > 
 > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:18:11PM -0600, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
 > > 
 > > OK, will do. Thanks
 > >   W.
 > > 
 > > As a sidenote: when you send messages like the one below (and the previous 
 > > one I got), you make them look as if _I_ have sent them, which is not 
 > > true. Please change this style of quoting.
 > > 
 > > > ----- Original Message -----
 > > > From: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
 > > > To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
 > > > Cc: "Daniel Frankowski" <dfrankow@winternet.com>; <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
 > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:23 AM
 > > > Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction
 > > > 
 > > > Even if it looks very strange to me that unstability of operating system can
 > > > affect compilation this way, I would tend to close this bug, especially if
 > > > it works for everything from 3.2 to mainline. But it's your call.
 > > > 
 > > > Giovanni Bajo
 > > > 
 > > 
 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > > Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
 > >                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction (fwd)
@ 2003-03-17 23:26 Wolfgang Bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-03-17 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10098; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction (fwd)
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:23:38 -0600 (CST)

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 01:45:17 +0100
 From: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>
 To: Daniel Frankowski <dfrankow@winternet.com>
 Cc: bangerth@dealii.org
 Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction
 
 
 > Giovanni,
 > Thanks for your rapid reply!
 
 You're welcome.
 
 > What did you try to reproduce the problem?  Download the .i and
 > compile the .i file with the given command line?  I should try exactly
 > what you did.
 > I don't quite know how to proceed.  Can I get more detail on exactly
 > what is failing somehow?
 
 Downloaded the .i, and compiled it using simply g++ -c. I tried with both
 3.2 (exactly your release) and 3.2.2 (for mingw) and they both work. I
 simply cannot reproduce your bug. Can you doublecheck that the .i you sent
 can ICE the compiler simply with "g++ -c filename.i" ?
 
 > Unfortunately in the Windows environment, it
 > is always possible that something unrelated to gcc somehow makes it
 > unstable.
 
 I use both Windows 2000 and XP with no stability problems at all. I agree
 that stability is fuzzy under 9x.
 
 > Any other suggestions?
 
 Not really. Maybe you can try downloading latest mingw and compiling the .i
 with it, to see if it still ICE your compiler. Wolfgang, I assume you cannot
 reproduce the bug as well on your system?
 
 Giovanni Bajo
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-27 14:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-27 15:25 bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction (fwd) Wolfgang Bangerth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-17 23:26 Wolfgang Bangerth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).