public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: optimization/10423: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3 when using -O2
@ 2003-04-21 22:36 Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2003-04-21 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR optimization/10423; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: dberger@motorola.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/10423: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3 when using -O2
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:30:17 -0700
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:03:20AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> (to the list:) How about we remove these options from 3.2.3 and 3.3 as
> well? It does not help anyone for them to be present but nonfunctional.
Um, sure.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: optimization/10423: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3 when using -O2
@ 2003-04-16 18:06 Zack Weinberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zack Weinberg @ 2003-04-16 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR optimization/10423; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: dberger@motorola.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/10423: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3
when using -O2
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:03:20 -0700
dberger@motorola.com writes:
> Compile with following using "gcc -O2 -fvolatile -S":
>
> void test(void)
> {
> *(char *)0x100 = 1;
> *(char *)0x100 = 1;
> *(char *)0x100 = 1;
> *(char *)0x100 = 1;
> }
Allow me to refer you to the release notes for gcc 3.4 (that will be):
GCC no longer accepts the options -fvolatile, -fvolatile-global and
-fvolatile-static. It is unlikely that they worked correctly in any
3.x release.
Note in particular the last sentence. You've just confirmed that it
doesn't work.
(to the list:) How about we remove these options from 3.2.3 and 3.3 as
well? It does not help anyone for them to be present but nonfunctional.
zw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* optimization/10423: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3 when using -O2
@ 2003-04-16 17:16 dberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dberger @ 2003-04-16 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 10423
>Category: optimization
>Synopsis: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3 when using -O2
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Wed Apr 16 17:16:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: dberger@motorola.com
>Release: 3.2-3
>Organization:
>Environment:
Cygwin and Solaris, native and cross compilers
>Description:
Compile with following using "gcc -O2 -fvolatile -S":
void test(void)
{
*(char *)0x100 = 1;
*(char *)0x100 = 1;
*(char *)0x100 = 1;
*(char *)0x100 = 1;
}
The definition of -fvolatile should cause four writes to be generated - always. With the 2.95 compiler that is what occurs. With the 3.2-3 compiler, only one remains after optimization. This is a serious problem for embedded, legacy programs.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Is there a workaround?
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-21 22:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-21 22:36 optimization/10423: -fvolatile switch not working in gcc 3.2-3 when using -O2 Richard Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-16 18:06 Zack Weinberg
2003-04-16 17:16 dberger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).