public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/10180: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function
@ 2003-04-23 17:59 mmitchel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel @ 2003-04-23 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, mmitchel, nobody, wwieser
Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel
Responsible-Changed-By: mmitchel
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 23 17:59:56 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Working on a fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/10180: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function
@ 2003-04-29 3:21 mmitchel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel @ 2003-04-29 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, mmitchel, wwieser
Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: mmitchel
State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 29 03:21:54 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/10180: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function
@ 2003-04-06 0:26 Steven Bosscher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-04-06 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/10180; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, wwieser@gmx.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/10180: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined
function
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 02:16:24 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10180
2.95 didn't have the tree-inliner, right? So this is probably a tree
inliner bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/10180: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function
@ 2003-03-21 15:14 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-03-21 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, wwieser
Old Synopsis: gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function
New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 21 15:14:55 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. The lack of a warning is a regression introduced
between 2.95 and 3.0. Actually inlining this function, however,
requires unit-at-a-time compilation, which is presently
being worked on.
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10180
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-29 3:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-23 17:59 c++/10180: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] gcc fails to warn about non-inlined function mmitchel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-29 3:21 mmitchel
2003-04-06 0:26 Steven Bosscher
2003-03-21 15:14 bangerth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).