public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: target/10390: [AIX 4.3.3] conflicting declarations in stdio.h
@ 2003-04-25 20:17 dje
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dje @ 2003-04-25 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, rehsack
Synopsis: [AIX 4.3.3] conflicting declarations in stdio.h
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->dje
Responsible-Changed-By: dje
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Apr 25 20:17:05 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
AIX
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: dje
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 25 20:17:05 2003
State-Changed-Why:
This is a GNU sed porting issue, not a GCC issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10390
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: target/10390: [AIX 4.3.3] conflicting declarations in stdio.h
@ 2003-04-26 21:16 David Edelsohn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Edelsohn @ 2003-04-26 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR target/10390; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/10390: [AIX 4.3.3] conflicting declarations in stdio.h
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:15:01 -0400
>>>>> Jens Rehsack writes:
Jens> I don't share your point of view, because defining both macros
Jens> (_LARGE_FILES and _LARGE_FILE_API) causes the failure. Or is
Jens> documentation existing (which I didn't found) where it's forbidden
Jens> defining both?
Yes, this is a bug, but this is not a *GCC* bug.
GCC *does not* provide its own stdio.h. GCC "fixes" many system
headers, including stdio.h. Possibly GCC should modify the logic of these
macros, but the original stdio.h in AIX is the one with the conflicting
declarations. One needs to look at the manual for use of the macros.
Possibly the bug is the GNU sed configuration for choosing to define both
macros.
Yes, there is a bug, but GCC did not create the conflicting
declarations, so GCC is not the source of the bug. Just because the error
message lists the GCC installation directory in the path does not mean
that GCC is responsible.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: target/10390: [AIX 4.3.3] conflicting declarations in stdio.h
@ 2003-04-26 6:46 Jens Rehsack
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Rehsack @ 2003-04-26 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dje; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR target/10390; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, dje@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rehsack@liwing.de
Cc:
Subject: Re: target/10390: [AIX 4.3.3] conflicting declarations in stdio.h
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:40:29 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10390
I don't share your point of view, because defining both macros
(_LARGE_FILES and _LARGE_FILE_API) causes the failure. Or is
documentation existing (which I didn't found) where it's forbidden
defining both?
Jens
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-26 21:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-25 20:17 target/10390: [AIX 4.3.3] conflicting declarations in stdio.h dje
2003-04-26 6:46 Jens Rehsack
2003-04-26 21:16 David Edelsohn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).