public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
@ 2003-04-28 22:12 paolo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo @ 2003-04-28 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bkoz, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jkanze, nobody

Synopsis: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 22:11:59 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    New g++ PR submitted.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10082


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
@ 2003-04-28 17:23 bkoz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bkoz @ 2003-04-28 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jkanze, nobody

Synopsis: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 17:23:12 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    
    Paolo, is there a corresponding g++ PR about this? If not, can one be created?
    
    -benjamin

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10082


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
@ 2003-03-15 16:16 Paolo Carlini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2003-03-15 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/10082; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, 
 jkanze@caicheuvreuse.com,  nobody@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 17:10:06 +0100

 ... of course I really meant: "has the same code for uninitialized_copy,
 uninitialized_fill, uninitialized_fill_n that current g++ has."
 
 Paolo.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10082
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
@ 2003-03-15 16:01 paolo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo @ 2003-03-15 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jkanze, nobody, paolo

Synopsis: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n

Responsible-Changed-From-To: paolo->unassigned
Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 16:01:42 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    I guess I have to resign.
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 16:01:42 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Turns out that the compiler is involved!
    Indeed:
    1- Using the code shown in the standard changes nothing of
    the compilation errors.
    2- Comeau together with libcomo compiles just fine the 
    testcase: libcomo has the _same_ code (SGI/HP) for
    uninitialized_copy_ that current g++ has.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10082


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
@ 2003-03-15 14:38 paolo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo @ 2003-03-15 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jkanze, nobody, paolo

Synopsis: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo
Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 14:38:36 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Patching.
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 15 14:38:36 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed. Thanks for the suggestion!

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10082


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
@ 2003-03-14 14:56 jkanze
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jkanze @ 2003-03-14 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats


>Number:         10082
>Category:       libstdc++
>Synopsis:       Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          rejects-legal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Mar 14 14:56:01 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     James Kanze
>Release:        g++3 (GCC) 3.2.2
>Organization:
>Environment:
054@~/tmp/news (98): uname -a
SunOS padev054 5.8 Generic_108528-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
>Description:
The compiler fails to compile the attached legal code.
The reason for this is that the library has not
implemented uninitialized_fill_n (and presumably
uninitialized_fill) in a conforming manner.

Log of the compile:
------------------------------------------
g++3 --verbose ccelide.cc -o ccelide
Reading specs from /home/team02/jakan/gnu/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.2.2/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-3.2.2/configure --prefix=/home/team02/jakan/gnu --program-suffix=3 --enable-threads=posix
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.2
 /home/team02/jakan/gnu/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.2.2/cc1plus -v -D__GNUC__=3 -D__GNUC_MINOR__=2 -D__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__=2 -D__GXX_ABI_VERSION=102 -Dsparc -Dsun -Dunix -D__svr4__ -D__SVR4 -D__PRAGMA_REDEFINE_EXTNAME -D__sparc__ -D__sun__ -D__unix__ -D__svr4__ -D__SVR4 -D__PRAGMA_REDEFINE_EXTNAME -D__sparc -D__sun -D__unix -Asystem=unix -Asystem=svr4 -D__NO_INLINE__ -D__STDC_HOSTED__=1 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE=1 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -D__EXTENSIONS__ -D__SIZE_TYPE__=unsigned int -D__PTRDIFF_TYPE__=int -D__WCHAR_TYPE__=long int -D__WINT_TYPE__=long int -D__GCC_NEW_VARARGS__ -Acpu=sparc -Amachine=sparc ccelide.cc -D__GNUG__=3 -D__DEPRECATED -D__EXCEPTIONS -quiet -dumpbase ccelide.cc -version -o /var/tmp//cc4LfBVo.s
GNU CPP version 3.2.2 (cpplib) (sparc ELF)
GNU C++ version 3.2.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
	compiled by GNU C version 3.2.2.
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/home/team02/jakan/gnu/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
 /home/team02/jakan/gnu/include/c++/3.2.2
 /home/team02/jakan/gnu/include/c++/3.2.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.8
 /home/team02/jakan/gnu/include/c++/3.2.2/backward
 /home/team02/jakan/gnu/include
 /home/team02/jakan/gnu/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.2.2/include
 /usr/include
End of search list.
ccelide.cc: In function `void std::_Construct(_T1*, const _T2&) [with _T1 = 
   Track, _T2 = Track]':
/home/team02/jakan/gnu/include/c++/3.2.2/bits/stl_uninitialized.h:191:   instantiated from `_ForwardIter std::__uninitialized_fill_n_aux(_ForwardIter, _Size, const _Tp&, __false_type) [with _ForwardIter = Track*, _Size = int, _Tp = Track]'
/home/team02/jakan/gnu/include/c++/3.2.2/bits/stl_uninitialized.h:216:   instantiated from `_ForwardIter std::uninitialized_fill_n(_ForwardIter, _Size, const _Tp&) [with _ForwardIter = Track*, _Size = int, _Tp = Track]'
ccelide.cc:26:   instantiated from here
ccelide.cc:11: `Track::Track(const Track&)' is private
/home/team02/jakan/gnu/include/c++/3.2.2/bits/stl_construct.h:78: within this 
   context
------------------------------------------
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:
The standard defines the semantics in terms of code.
Why not use it?
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
 
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="ccelide.cc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ccelide.cc"
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^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-28 22:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-28 22:12 libstdc++/10082: Wrong semantics in uninitialized_fill_n paolo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-28 17:23 bkoz
2003-03-15 16:16 Paolo Carlini
2003-03-15 16:01 paolo
2003-03-15 14:38 paolo
2003-03-14 14:56 jkanze

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).