Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken

Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken

[Joseph S. Myers]

The following reply was made to PR c/2995; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:54:14 +0100 (BST)

 On Thu, 8 May 2003, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
 
 >  http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 >  trail&database=gcc&pr=2995
 >  
 >  Confirmed with mainline 20030507
 
 We know what the underlying problem is here (thread starting at
 <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-11/msg00790.html>) - the question is
 whether we can deprecate complex integers altogether, or just complex
 integer division.
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk

Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR c/2995; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 01:37:15 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=2995
 
 Confirmed with mainline 20030507
 
 Dara
 

c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken

[ee96090]

>Number:         2995
>Category:       c
>Synopsis:       __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue May 29 11:06:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     egcs
>Release:        egcs-2.91.66
>Organization:
>Environment:
Slackware 7.1
>Description:
The attached program has the following output:
real = 1; imag = -1; y = 5

Which means the typecasts from (__complex__ short int) to
 (__complex__ int) are not working. There is a computation 
with complex int (x) and another with normal int (y). y is 
computed correctly (as expected) whilst x isn't.
>How-To-Repeat:
Just compile and run the program.
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="test.c"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="test.c"

I2luY2x1ZGUgPGNvbXBsZXguaD4KI2luY2x1ZGUgPHN0ZGlvLmg+CiNpbmNsdWRlIDxsaW1pdHMu
aD4KCgp2b2lkIG1haW4odm9pZCkKewogICAgLyoqLyAgICAgICAgc2hvcnQgaW50IHk7CiAgICBf
X2NvbXBsZXhfXyBzaG9ydCBpbnQgeDsKICAgIAogICAgeCA9IDEwICsgN2o7CiAgICB5ID0gNTsK
ICAgIHggPSAoKChfX2NvbXBsZXhfXyBpbnQpeCkgKiBTSFJUX01BWCkgLyBTSFJUX01BWDsKICAg
IHkgPSAoKCggICAgICAgICAgICBpbnQpeSkgKiBTSFJUX01BWCkgLyBTSFJUX01BWDsKICAgIHBy
aW50ZigicmVhbCA9ICVoaTsgaW1hZyA9ICVoaTsgeSA9ICVoaVxuIiwgX19yZWFsX18geCwgX19p
bWFnX18geCwgeSk7Cn0K