public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration
@ 2003-05-08 23:22 bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-05-08 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, ssomers

Synopsis: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Thu May  8 23:22:08 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Fixed on mainline:
    g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
    x.cc:4: error: type `typename std::_Rb_tree<_Key, std::pair<const _Key, _Tp>,
       std::_Select1st<std::pair<const _Key, _Tp> >, _Compare,
       _Alloc>::allocator_type' is not derived from type `Foo<T>'
    x.cc:4: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `reference' with no type
    x.cc:4: error: expected `;'

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6758


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration
@ 2003-05-09  0:36 Wolfgang Bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-05-09  0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/6758; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 19:30:59 -0500 (CDT)

 > To be fair, the code is legal in 3.3 because of the implicit typename
 > extension. I guess this bug should be kept open (not analyzed - there is 
 > no testcase), in case someone wants to fix the ICE in the 3.3 branch.
 
 Well, why? The code ICEd since at least 2.95, so it's not a regression. 
 It's fixed on mainline. Bugs that are not regressions are not going to be 
 fixed on 3.3 branch, so why keep it open?
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration
@ 2003-05-09  0:06 Giovanni Bajo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Giovanni Bajo @ 2003-05-09  0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/6758; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<ssomers@opnet.com>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 01:58:05 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6758
 
 To be fair, the code is legal in 3.3 because of the implicit typename
 extension. I guess this bug should be kept open (not analyzed - there is no
 testcase), in case someone wants to fix the ICE in the 3.3 branch.
 
 Giovanni Bajo
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-09  0:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-08 23:22 c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration bangerth
2003-05-09  0:06 Giovanni Bajo
2003-05-09  0:36 Wolfgang Bangerth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).