Re: java/1308: It would be nice if gcj -d worked for object files.

Re: java/1308: It would be nice if gcj -d worked for object files.

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR java/1308; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: apbianco@gcc.gnu.org, mdejong@cygnus.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/1308: It would be nice if gcj -d worked for object files.
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:06:20 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=1308
 
 Hello,
 
 this report was made against gcc pre 3.0 cvs. Does anybody know whether  
 this problem has been addressed since? Thanks,
 
 Dara
 

java/1308: It would be nice if gcj -d worked for object files.

[mdejong]

>Number:         1308
>Category:       java
>Synopsis:       It would be nice if gcj -d worked for object files.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    apbianco
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Dec 20 12:18:53 PST 2000
>Closed-Date:    
>Last-Modified:  
>Originator:     mdejong@cygnus.com
>Release:        CVS
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:
The -d option writes .class files into an optional
directory when gcj -C also passed. If would be nice
if gcj -c -d build also worked this way.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

Formerly PR gcj/287

>Unformatted: