public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@stanford.edu> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from another nested class Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030513171601.597.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR java/6937; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@stanford.edu> To: Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de> Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from another nested class Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:13:12 -0700 On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 03:35 AM, Michael Koch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am Montag, 12. Mai 2003 22:04 schrieben Sie: >> Begin forwarded message: >>> From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com> >>> Date: Mon May 12, 2003 12:39:59 PM US/Pacific >>> To: konqueror@gmx.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org >>> Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from >>> another nested class >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- >>> trail&database=gcc&pr=6937 >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> could the submitter please confirm if this problem still occurs >>> with gcc 3.3 prerelease or mainline cvs? On both I get errors >>> compiling: >>> >>> ./Container.java:1: Class `Container' already defined in >>> Container.java:1. >>> public class Container >>> ^ >>> ./Container.java:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out >>> bash-2.04$ /tmp/dara1/bin/gcj -C Container.java Derived.java >>> ./Container.java:1: error: Class `Container' already defined in >>> Container.java:1. >>> public class Container >>> ^ >>> ./Container.java:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Dara > > Yes I still get the segfault with trunk-cvs from 20030513. > > But I do get an error with JDK 1.4.1 now too. My testcase is obviously > wrong. I think this can be closed. Do you just want to close it, or mark it as an ICE on illegal code? Thanks, Dara
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-13 17:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-05-13 17:16 Dara Hazeghi [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-05-13 18:07 Michael Koch 2003-05-13 6:38 steven 2003-05-12 19:46 Dara Hazeghi 2002-06-05 11:16 konqueror
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030513171601.597.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=dhazeghi@stanford.edu \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).