Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from another nested class

[Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>]

The following reply was made to PR java/6937; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@stanford.edu>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from another nested class
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:03:23 +0200

 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Am Dienstag, 13. Mai 2003 19:13 schrieb Dara Hazeghi:
 > On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 03:35 AM, Michael Koch wrote:
 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 > > Hash: SHA1
 > >
 > > Am Montag, 12. Mai 2003 22:04 schrieben Sie:
 > >> Begin forwarded message:
 > >>> From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
 > >>> Date: Mon May 12, 2003  12:39:59 PM US/Pacific
 > >>> To: konqueror@gmx.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
 > >>> Subject: Re: java/6937: Segfault when deriving a class from
 > >>> another nested class
 > >>>
 > >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-
 > >>> trail&database=3Dgcc&pr=3D6937
 > >>>
 > >>> Hello,
 > >>>
 > >>> could the submitter please confirm if this problem still occurs
 > >>> with gcc 3.3 prerelease or mainline cvs? On both I get errors
 > >>> compiling:
 > >>>
 > >>> ./Container.java:1: Class `Container' already defined in
 > >>> Container.java:1.
 > >>>    public class Container
 > >>>                 ^
 > >>> ./Container.java:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
 > >>> bash-2.04$ /tmp/dara1/bin/gcj -C Container.java Derived.java
 > >>> ./Container.java:1: error: Class `Container' already defined in
 > >>> Container.java:1.
 > >>>    public class Container
 > >>>                 ^
 > >>> ./Container.java:5: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
 > >>>
 > >>> Thanks,
 > >>>
 > >>> Dara
 > >
 > > Yes I still get the segfault with trunk-cvs from 20030513.
 > >
 > > But I do get an error with JDK 1.4.1 now too. My testcase is
 > > obviously wrong. I think this can be closed.
 >
 > Do you just want to close it, or mark it as an ICE on illegal code?
 > Thanks,
 
 Just close it. I think I remember that Tom said that an ICE on illegal=20
 code is okay.
 
 Michael
 =2D --=20
 Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE+wTNsWSOgCCdjSDsRAoFiAJ4iT0Hjtrfw6ZM/lc37m39dFjq2OgCeOgme
 ujFxheUeRUa7RiUHO/s7DdU=3D
 =3DazXx
 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----