public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bangerth@dealii.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, lloyd@acm.jhu.edu,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 01:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030520011638.25212.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
Old Synopsis: GCC 3.3 miscompiles code with -O3 -fPIC on x86
New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue May 20 01:16:37 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. This is a smaller snippet (it has nothing to
do with namespaces):
----------------------------
int* i;
int& get_x() {
return *i;
}
int main() {
int j;
i = &j;
get_x();
}
--------------------------
It crashed in get_x:
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.3-pre/bin/c++ -O3 -fPIC x.cc
g/x> ./a.out
Segmentation fault
Note that we really need both -fPIC and -O3.
This crashes with both 3.3 and present mainline. It
doesn't with 2.95 and 3.2.3, so it's definitely a
regression worth fixing!
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10877
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-20 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-20 1:16 bangerth [this message]
2003-05-20 2:06 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-20 13:56 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-20 16:16 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-20 17:06 Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-20 17:06 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-20 17:16 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-20 19:16 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-20 19:27 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-20 19:36 Andrew Pinski
2003-05-20 22:46 Janis Johnson
2003-05-21 8:46 Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-21 11:28 Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-21 12:46 Christian Ehrhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030520011638.25212.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=bangerth@dealii.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=lloyd@acm.jhu.edu \
--cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).