public inbox for gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arthur Cohen <arthur.cohen@embecosm.com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>,
	Pierre-Emmanuel Patry <pierre-emmanuel.patry@embecosm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC/Rust libgrust-v2/to-submit branch
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 16:20:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c03a4a18-c889-43b6-a4f4-4b4b5b137fc9@embecosm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871qcktqxd.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>

Hi Thomas!

A newer version of the library has been force-pushed to the branch 
`libgrust-v2/to-submit`.

On 11/20/23 15:55, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Arthur and Pierre-Emmanuel have prepared a GCC/Rust libgrust-v2/to-submit
> branch: <https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/tree/libgrust-v2/to-submit>.
> In that one, most of the issues raised have been addressed, and which
> I've now successfully "tested" in my different GCC configurations,
> requiring just one additional change (see end of this email).  I'm using
> "tested" in quotes here, as libgrust currently is still missing its
> eventual content, and still is without actual users, so we may still be
> up for surprises later on.  ;-)
> 
> On 2023-10-27T22:41:52+0200, I wrote:
>> On 2023-09-27T00:25:16+0200, I wrote:
>>> don't we also directly need to
>>> incorporate here a few GCC/Rust master branch follow-on commits, like:
>>>
>>>    - commit 171ea4e2b3e202067c50f9c206974fbe1da691c0 "fixup: Fix bootstrap build"
>>>    - commit 61cbe201029658c32e5c360823b9a1a17d21b03c "fixup: Fix missing build dependency"
>>
>> I've not yet run into the need for these two.  Let's please leave these
>> out of the upstream submission for now, until we understand what exactly
>> these are necessary for.
> 
> (Still the same.)

Do you mean that we should remove the content of these commits from the 
submission? If so, I believe it's now done.

> 
>> However:
>>
>>>    - commit 6a8b207b9ef7f9038e0cae7766117428783825d8 "libgrust: Add dependency to libstdc++"
>>
>> ... this one definitely is necessary right now; see discussion in
>> <https://inbox.sourceware.org/8734xv24dd.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>
>> "Disable target libgrust if we're not building target libstdc++".
> 
> This one still isn't in the GCC/Rust libgrust-v2/to-submit branch -- but
> having now tested that branch, I'm now no longer seeing the respective
> build failure.  Isn't that change "libgrust: Add dependency to libstdc++"
> still necessary, conceptually?  (Maybe we're just lucky, currently?)
> I'll be sure to re-test in my different GCC configurations once libgrust
> gains actual content and use.  (..., which might then re-expose the
> original problem?)

This commit was integrated into another one:

fb31093105e build: Add libgrust as compilation modules

(on libgrust-v2/to-submit as of 2 minutes ago)

> 
>> And:
>>
>>> (Not sure if all of these are necessary and/or if that's the complete
>>> list; haven't looked up the corresponding GCC/Rust GitHub PRs.)
>>>
>>>> --- a/gcc/rust/config-lang.in
>>>> +++ b/gcc/rust/config-lang.in
>>>
>>>> +target_libs="target-libffi target-libbacktrace target-libgrust"
>>>
>>> Please don't add back 'target-libffi' and 'target-libbacktrace' here;
>>> just 'target-libgrust'.  (As is present in GCC/Rust master branch, and
>>> per commit 7411eca498beb13729cc2acec77e68250940aa81
>>> "Rust: Don't depend on unused 'target-libffi', 'target-libbacktrace'".)
>>
>> ... that change is necessary, too.
> 
> That's still unchanged in the GCC/Rust libgrust-v2/to-submit branch;
> please apply to 'gcc/rust/config-lang.in':
> 
>      -target_libs="target-libffi target-libbacktrace target-libgrust"
>      +target_libs=target-libgrust
> 
> Then, still should re-order the commits so that (re)generation of
> auto-generated files comes before use of libgrust (so that later
> bisection doesn't break), and move the 'contrib/gcc_update' update into
> the commit that adds the auto-generated files.

Do you mean that the regeneration should happen before the commit adding 
the proc_macro library? Or that when we keep going and adding more 
commits on top of this, we need to make sure the regeneration commit 
happens before any code starts using/depending on libgrust/?

And alright, we'll move the changes to contrib/gcc_update into the 
regeneration commit.

All the best, and thanks again for testing :)

Arthur

> 
> 
> Grüße
>   Thomas
> -----------------
> Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-21 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-20 11:59 [PATCH 1/3] librust: Add libproc_macro and build system Arthur Cohen
2023-09-20 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] build: Add libgrust as compilation modules Arthur Cohen
2023-09-26 11:42   ` Richard Biener
2023-09-26 22:25   ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-10-27 20:41     ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-11-20 14:55       ` GCC/Rust libgrust-v2/to-submit branch (was: [PATCH 2/3] build: Add libgrust as compilation modules) Thomas Schwinge
2023-11-21 15:20         ` Arthur Cohen [this message]
2023-11-27 15:46           ` GCC/Rust libgrust-v2/to-submit branch Thomas Schwinge
2023-12-12  9:39             ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-12-12 15:25               ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-09-20 11:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] build: Regenerate build files Arthur Cohen
2023-09-26 11:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] librust: Add libproc_macro and build system Richard Biener
2023-09-26 22:42   ` Thomas Schwinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c03a4a18-c889-43b6-a4f4-4b4b5b137fc9@embecosm.com \
    --to=arthur.cohen@embecosm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=pierre-emmanuel.patry@embecosm.com \
    --cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).