public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* pure64 patch for 4.5.0
@ 2009-11-10  2:09 Justin P. Mattock
  2009-11-10  6:12 ` Ian Lance Taylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2009-11-10  2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc

hello,
wanting to know if there's a pure64 patch for 4.5.0
right now I've plugged in a pure64 patch for 4.4.1
on 4.5.0.
will this be good or is there more to that needs to be added.
http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/gcc-4.4.1-pure64-1.patch

Justin P. Mattock

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: pure64 patch for 4.5.0
  2009-11-10  2:09 pure64 patch for 4.5.0 Justin P. Mattock
@ 2009-11-10  6:12 ` Ian Lance Taylor
  2009-11-10  6:18   ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2009-11-10  6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Justin P. Mattock; +Cc: gcc

"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com> writes:

> wanting to know if there's a pure64 patch for 4.5.0
> right now I've plugged in a pure64 patch for 4.4.1
> on 4.5.0.
> will this be good or is there more to that needs to be added.
> http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/gcc-4.4.1-pure64-1.patch

You might do better to ask the people who wrote that patch.

The patch does look generally plausible to me but I didn't really look
at it in detail.

Ian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: pure64 patch for 4.5.0
  2009-11-10  6:12 ` Ian Lance Taylor
@ 2009-11-10  6:18   ` Justin P. Mattock
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2009-11-10  6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Lance Taylor; +Cc: gcc

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Justin P. Mattock"<justinmattock@gmail.com>  writes:
>
>    
>> wanting to know if there's a pure64 patch for 4.5.0
>> right now I've plugged in a pure64 patch for 4.4.1
>> on 4.5.0.
>> will this be good or is there more to that needs to be added.
>> http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/gcc-4.4.1-pure64-1.patch
>>      
>
> You might do better to ask the people who wrote that patch.
>
> The patch does look generally plausible to me but I didn't really look
> at it in detail.
>
> Ian
>
>    
Cool thanks.
I can try that and see.
in any case it's probably better
to stick with a stable version.
(I just can't help it having
an  itch to try things out).

Justin P. Mattock

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-10  6:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-10  2:09 pure64 patch for 4.5.0 Justin P. Mattock
2009-11-10  6:12 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-11-10  6:18   ` Justin P. Mattock

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).