public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: "Anton Wöllert" <a.woellert@gmail.com>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Relation between gcc version and libstdc++ version
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:09:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdQVD3osSpX+v8R=ALQtBJiWAtVKRY+TNssGR8g8GbauHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4161b707473552ce74c41c8867c2cc6d77ff4e05.camel@gmail.com>

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022, 15:48 Anton Wöllert via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello list!
>
> I was trying to build a cross-compilation toolchain for a specific
> target using a newer GCC version, than the one that the binaries were
> build on the target.
>
> The C part seems to work well, but the C++ part doesn't.  It seems that
> the G++ ships it's own libstdc++ include headers.


Yes, because libstdc++ is part of GCC.


  If this libstdc++ is
> newer than the one one the target, I get undefined references (because
> there are some newer implementation details and things like that).


Then you're not telling the executable how find the new libstdc++.

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html#faq.how_to_set_paths



Is
> it possible to tell G++/GCC to use the libstdc++.so from the target and
> also to use the C++ headers (like iostream) from the target?
>

It's possible, but unsupported and probably won't work.

If not, is there any reason this is hard-coded?
>

The libstdc++ headers are tightly coupled to the GCC version, so headers
from a given GCC release might not even compile with a newer or older GCC.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: "Anton Wöllert" <a.woellert@gmail.com>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Relation between gcc version and libstdc++ version
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:09:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdQVD3osSpX+v8R=ALQtBJiWAtVKRY+TNssGR8g8GbauHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20220830160942.3Q9fNPcY6vM85OryBjRFT4vjfPIWySfU4yH5tHfWBGI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4161b707473552ce74c41c8867c2cc6d77ff4e05.camel@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1174 bytes --]

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022, 15:48 Anton Wöllert via Gcc, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello list!
>
> I was trying to build a cross-compilation toolchain for a specific
> target using a newer GCC version, than the one that the binaries were
> build on the target.
>
> The C part seems to work well, but the C++ part doesn't.  It seems that
> the G++ ships it's own libstdc++ include headers.


Yes, because libstdc++ is part of GCC.


  If this libstdc++ is
> newer than the one one the target, I get undefined references (because
> there are some newer implementation details and things like that).


Then you're not telling the executable how find the new libstdc++.

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html#faq.how_to_set_paths



Is
> it possible to tell G++/GCC to use the libstdc++.so from the target and
> also to use the C++ headers (like iostream) from the target?
>

It's possible, but unsupported and probably won't work.

If not, is there any reason this is hard-coded?
>

The libstdc++ headers are tightly coupled to the GCC version, so headers
from a given GCC release might not even compile with a newer or older GCC.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-30 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-30 14:47 Anton Wöllert
2022-08-30 16:09 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2022-08-30 16:09   ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-30 16:53   ` Anton Wöllert
2022-08-30 17:20     ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-30 17:20       ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-30 17:21       ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-30 17:21         ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-30 18:46         ` Anton Wöllert
2022-08-30 19:24           ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-30 19:24             ` Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAH6eHdQVD3osSpX+v8R=ALQtBJiWAtVKRY+TNssGR8g8GbauHw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.woellert@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).