* [PATCH] gdb/csky complete csky_dwarf_reg_to_regnum
@ 2022-07-07 2:09 Jiangshuai Li
2022-07-15 17:21 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiangshuai Li @ 2022-07-07 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: jiangshuai_li
For csky arch, the correspondence between Dwarf registers and GDB
registers are as follows:
dwarf regnos 0~31 ==> gdb regs r0~r31
dwarf regno CSKY_HI_REGNUM(36) ==> gdb reg hi
dwarf regno CSKY_LO_REGNUM(37) ==> gdb reg hi
dwarf regno CSKY_PC_REGNUM(72) ==> gdb reg pc
dwarf regnos FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_FIRST(74)~FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_LAST(201)
==>
gdb regs s0~s127 (pseudo regs for float and vector regs)
other dwarf regnos have no corresponding gdb regs to them.
---
gdb/csky-tdep.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
gdb/csky-tdep.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/csky-tdep.c b/gdb/csky-tdep.c
index b63ff7ccd44..502b01e33e1 100644
--- a/gdb/csky-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/csky-tdep.c
@@ -2556,9 +2556,28 @@ csky_register_reggroup_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum,
static int
csky_dwarf_reg_to_regnum (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int dw_reg)
{
- if (dw_reg < 0 || dw_reg >= CSKY_NUM_REGS)
- return -1;
- return dw_reg;
+ /* For GPRs. */
+ if (dw_reg >= CSKY_R0_REGNUM && dw_reg <= (CSKY_R0_REGNUM + 31))
+ return dw_reg;
+
+ /* For Hi, Lo, PC. */
+ if ((dw_reg == CSKY_HI_REGNUM) || (dw_reg == CSKY_LO_REGNUM)
+ || (dw_reg == CSKY_PC_REGNUM))
+ return dw_reg;
+
+ /* For Float and Vector pseudo registers. */
+ if ((dw_reg >= FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_FIRST) && (dw_reg <= FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_LAST))
+ {
+ char name_buf[4];
+
+ xsnprintf (name_buf, sizeof (name_buf), "s%d",
+ dw_reg - FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_FIRST);
+ return user_reg_map_name_to_regnum (gdbarch, name_buf,
+ strlen (name_buf));
+ }
+
+ /* Others, unknown. */
+ return -1;
}
/* Override interface for command: info register. */
diff --git a/gdb/csky-tdep.h b/gdb/csky-tdep.h
index 4ff8a6b8613..4cfc0a5d086 100644
--- a/gdb/csky-tdep.h
+++ b/gdb/csky-tdep.h
@@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ enum csky_regnum
/* For fr0~fr15, fr16~fr31, vr0~vr15 check. */
#define CSKY_FULL16_ONEHOT_VALUE 0xffff
+/* Define for CSKY FV pseudo regs for dwarf regs. */
+#define FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_FIRST 74
+#define FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_LAST 201
+
/* Number of processor registers w/o ICE registers. */
#define CSKY_NUM_REGS (CSKY_MAX_REGS - CSKY_CRBANK_NUM_REGS)
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gdb/csky complete csky_dwarf_reg_to_regnum
2022-07-07 2:09 [PATCH] gdb/csky complete csky_dwarf_reg_to_regnum Jiangshuai Li
@ 2022-07-15 17:21 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2022-07-15 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiangshuai Li; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> Jiangshuai Li <jiangshuai_li@c-sky.com> writes:
> + if (dw_reg >= CSKY_R0_REGNUM && dw_reg <= (CSKY_R0_REGNUM + 31))
This line and some others have too many parentheses.
> + /* For Float and Vector pseudo registers. */
> + if ((dw_reg >= FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_FIRST) && (dw_reg <= FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_LAST))
> + {
> + char name_buf[4];
> +
> + xsnprintf (name_buf, sizeof (name_buf), "s%d",
> + dw_reg - FV_PSEUDO_REGNO_FIRST);
> + return user_reg_map_name_to_regnum (gdbarch, name_buf,
> + strlen (name_buf));
This seems like a very roundabout approach. Is there a reason it's done
this way?
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-15 17:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-07 2:09 [PATCH] gdb/csky complete csky_dwarf_reg_to_regnum Jiangshuai Li
2022-07-15 17:21 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).