public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_silent_and_more
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:39:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221123183959.2476477-10-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221123183959.2476477-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>

This one is a bit tricky.  The clear tests seem to depend on the various
breakpoints that have been set before, starting with the "silent"
breakpoints.  So, move all this in a single chunk, it can always be
split later if needed.

Change-Id: I7ba61a5b130ade63eda0c4790534840339f8a72f
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp | 118 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp
index cc327c195f46..e8762ffa664c 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp
@@ -533,75 +533,81 @@ gdb_test "break if (1)" \
 
 # Verify that a "silent" breakpoint can be set, and that GDB is indeed
 # "silent" about its triggering.
-#
-if ![runto_main] then {
-    return
-}
 
-gdb_test_multiple "break $bp_location1" \
-    "set to-be-silent break bp_location1" {
-	-re "Breakpoint (\[0-9\]*) at .*, line $bp_location1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
-	    set bpno $expect_out(1,string)
-	    pass "set to-be-silent break bp_location1"
-	}
+proc_with_prefix test_break_silent_and_more {} {
+    clean_restart break
+
+    if ![runto_main] then {
+	return
     }
 
-gdb_test "commands $bpno\nsilent\nend" ">end" "set silent break bp_location1"
+    gdb_test_multiple "break $::bp_location1" \
+	"set to-be-silent break bp_location1" {
+	    -re "Breakpoint (\[0-9\]*) at .*, line $::bp_location1.*$::gdb_prompt $" {
+		set bpno $expect_out(1,string)
+		pass "set to-be-silent break bp_location1"
+	    }
+	}
 
-gdb_test "info break $bpno" \
-    "\[0-9\]*\[ \t\]*breakpoint.*:$bp_location1\r\n\[ \t\]*silent.*" \
-    "info silent break bp_location1"
+    gdb_test "commands $bpno\nsilent\nend" ">end" "set silent break bp_location1"
 
-gdb_test "continue" "Continuing." \
-    "hit silent break bp_location1"
+    gdb_test "info break $bpno" \
+	"\[0-9\]*\[ \t\]*breakpoint.*:$::bp_location1\r\n\[ \t\]*silent.*" \
+	"info silent break bp_location1"
 
-gdb_test "bt" "#0  main .* at .*:$bp_location1.*" \
-    "stopped for silent break bp_location1"
+    gdb_test "continue" "Continuing." \
+	"hit silent break bp_location1"
 
-# Verify the $_hit_bpnum convenience variable is set to the silent hit bpno.
-gdb_test "printf \"%d\\n\", \$_hit_bpnum" "$bpno" \
-    "Silent breakpoint hit \$_hit_bpnum is silent $bpno"
- 
-# Verify that GDB can at least parse a breakpoint with the
-# "thread" keyword.  (We won't attempt to test here that a
-# thread-specific breakpoint really triggers appropriately.
-# The gdb.threads subdirectory contains tests for that.)
-#
-set bp_location12 [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint 12 here"]
-gdb_test "break $bp_location12 thread 999" "Unknown thread 999.*" \
-    "thread-specific breakpoint on non-existent thread disallowed"
+    gdb_test "bt" "#0  main .* at .*:$::bp_location1.*" \
+	"stopped for silent break bp_location1"
 
-gdb_test "break $bp_location12 thread foo" \
-    "Invalid thread ID: foo" \
-    "thread-specific breakpoint on bogus thread ID disallowed"
+    # Verify the $_hit_bpnum convenience variable is set to the silent hit bpno.
+    gdb_test "printf \"%d\\n\", \$_hit_bpnum" "$bpno" \
+	"Silent breakpoint hit \$_hit_bpnum is silent $bpno"
 
-# Verify that GDB responds gracefully to a breakpoint command with
-# trailing garbage.
-#
-gdb_test "break $bp_location12 foo" \
-    "malformed linespec error: unexpected string, \"foo\".*" \
-    "breakpoint with trailing garbage disallowed"
+    # Verify that GDB can at least parse a breakpoint with the
+    # "thread" keyword.  (We won't attempt to test here that a
+    # thread-specific breakpoint really triggers appropriately.
+    # The gdb.threads subdirectory contains tests for that.)
+    #
+    set bp_location12 [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint 12 here"]
+    gdb_test "break $bp_location12 thread 999" "Unknown thread 999.*" \
+	"thread-specific breakpoint on non-existent thread disallowed"
 
-# Verify that GDB responds gracefully to a "clear" command that has
-# no matching breakpoint.  (First, get us off the current source line,
-# which we know has a breakpoint.)
-#
-gdb_test "next" "marker1.*" "step over breakpoint"
+    gdb_test "break $bp_location12 thread foo" \
+	"Invalid thread ID: foo" \
+	"thread-specific breakpoint on bogus thread ID disallowed"
 
-gdb_test "clear 81" "No breakpoint at 81.*" \
-    "clear line has no breakpoint disallowed"
+    # Verify that GDB responds gracefully to a breakpoint command with
+    # trailing garbage.
+    #
+    gdb_test "break $bp_location12 foo" \
+	"malformed linespec error: unexpected string, \"foo\".*" \
+	"breakpoint with trailing garbage disallowed"
 
-gdb_test "clear" "No breakpoint at this line.*" \
-    "clear current line has no breakpoint disallowed"
+    # Verify that GDB responds gracefully to a "clear" command that has
+    # no matching breakpoint.  (First, get us off the current source line,
+    # which we know has a breakpoint.)
+    #
+    gdb_test "next" "marker1.*" "step over breakpoint"
 
-# Verify that we can set and clear multiple breakpoints.
-#
-# We don't test that it deletes the correct breakpoints.  We do at
-# least test that it deletes more than one breakpoint.
-#
-gdb_test "break marker3" "Breakpoint.*at.*" "break marker3 #1"
-gdb_test "break marker3" "Breakpoint.*at.*" "break marker3 #2"
-gdb_test "clear marker3" {Deleted breakpoints [0-9]+ [0-9]+.*}
+    gdb_test "clear 81" "No breakpoint at 81.*" \
+	"clear line has no breakpoint disallowed"
+
+    gdb_test "clear" "No breakpoint at this line.*" \
+	"clear current line has no breakpoint disallowed"
+
+    # Verify that we can set and clear multiple breakpoints.
+    #
+    # We don't test that it deletes the correct breakpoints.  We do at
+    # least test that it deletes more than one breakpoint.
+    #
+    gdb_test "break marker3" "Breakpoint.*at.*" "break marker3 #1"
+    gdb_test "break marker3" "Breakpoint.*at.*" "break marker3 #2"
+    gdb_test "clear marker3" {Deleted breakpoints [0-9]+ [0-9]+.*}
+}
+
+test_break_silent_and_more
 
 # Verify that a breakpoint can be set via a convenience variable.
 
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-23 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-23 18:39 [PATCH 00/14] Break up gdb.base/break.exp in multiple procs Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 01/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_commands_clear Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 02/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_file_line_convenience_var Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 03/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_rbreak_shlib Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 04/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_optimized_prologue Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 05/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: use proc_with_prefix for test_next_with_recursion Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 06/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_finish_arguments Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 07/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_user_call Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 08/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_line_convenience_var Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 10/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_default Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 11/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break_nonexistent_line Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 12/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_no_break_on_catchpoint Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 13/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_tbreak Simon Marchi
2022-11-23 18:39 ` [PATCH 14/14] gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.exp: split test_break Simon Marchi
2022-11-24  3:03 ` [PATCH 00/14] Break up gdb.base/break.exp in multiple procs Kevin Buettner
2022-11-24 15:14   ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221123183959.2476477-10-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).