public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] [gdb/tdep] Fix amd64/i386_stack_frame_destroyed_p
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:23:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230213142309.24366-3-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230213142309.24366-1-tdevries@suse.de>

The use of compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid in both amd64_stack_frame_destroyed_p
and i386_stack_frame_destroyed_p is problematic, in the sense that the
functions no longer match their documented behaviour.

Fix this by moving the use of compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid to
amd64_epilogue_frame_sniffer and i386_epilogue_frame_sniffer.  NFC.
---
 gdb/amd64-tdep.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 gdb/i386-tdep.c  | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/amd64-tdep.c b/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
index d2e683b6fa8..0ec9b23922d 100644
--- a/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
@@ -2903,9 +2903,6 @@ amd64_stack_frame_destroyed_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
 {
   gdb_byte insn;
 
-  if (compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid (find_pc_compunit_symtab (pc)))
-    return 0;
-
   if (target_read_memory (pc, &insn, 1))
     return 0;   /* Can't read memory at pc.  */
 
@@ -2920,11 +2917,19 @@ amd64_epilogue_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
 			      frame_info_ptr this_frame,
 			      void **this_prologue_cache)
 {
-  if (frame_relative_level (this_frame) == 0)
-    return amd64_stack_frame_destroyed_p (get_frame_arch (this_frame),
-					  get_frame_pc (this_frame));
-  else
+  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
+  CORE_ADDR pc = get_frame_pc (this_frame);
+
+  if (frame_relative_level (this_frame) != 0)
+    /* We're not in the inner frame, so assume we're not in an epilogue.  */
     return 0;
+
+  if (compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid (find_pc_compunit_symtab (pc)))
+    /* Don't override the symtab unwinders.  */
+    return 0;
+
+  /* Check whether we're in an epilogue.  */
+  return amd64_stack_frame_destroyed_p (gdbarch, pc);
 }
 
 static struct amd64_frame_cache *
diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
index 3fe548d8c68..5e797d098e8 100644
--- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
@@ -2219,10 +2219,6 @@ static int
 i386_stack_frame_destroyed_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
 {
   gdb_byte insn;
-
-  if (compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid (find_pc_compunit_symtab (pc)))
-    return 0;
-
   if (target_read_memory (pc, &insn, 1))
     return 0;	/* Can't read memory at pc.  */
 
@@ -2237,11 +2233,19 @@ i386_epilogue_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
 			     frame_info_ptr this_frame,
 			     void **this_prologue_cache)
 {
-  if (frame_relative_level (this_frame) == 0)
-    return i386_stack_frame_destroyed_p (get_frame_arch (this_frame),
-					 get_frame_pc (this_frame));
-  else
+  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
+  CORE_ADDR pc = get_frame_pc (this_frame);
+
+  if (frame_relative_level (this_frame) != 0)
+    /* We're not in the inner frame, so assume we're not in an epilogue.  */
+    return 0;
+
+  if (compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid (find_pc_compunit_symtab (pc)))
+    /* Don't override the symtab unwinders.  */
     return 0;
+
+  /* Check whether we're in an epilogue.  */
+  return i386_stack_frame_destroyed_p (gdbarch, pc);
 }
 
 static struct i386_frame_cache *
-- 
2.35.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13 14:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] [gdb/symtab] Assume epilogue unwind info is valid unless gcc < 4.5.0 Tom de Vries
2023-02-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] [gdb/symtab] Factor out compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid Tom de Vries
2023-02-14 15:56   ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-14 22:36     ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-20 10:27       ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-13 14:23 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2023-02-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] [gdb/tdep] Add amd64/i386 epilogue override unwinders Tom de Vries
2023-02-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] [gdb/symtab] Trust epilogue unwind info for unknown producer (-g0 case) Tom de Vries
2023-02-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] [gdb/symtab] Trust epilogue unwind info for unknown or non-gcc producer Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230213142309.24366-3-tdevries@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).