public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] [gdb/tdep] Add amd64/i386 epilogue override unwinders
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:23:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230213142309.24366-4-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230213142309.24366-1-tdevries@suse.de>

For amd64 the current frame-unwinders are:
...
$ gdb -q -batch -ex "set arch i386:x86-64" -ex "maint info frame-unwinders"
The target architecture is set to "i386:x86-64".
dummy                   DUMMY_FRAME
dwarf2 tailcall         TAILCALL_FRAME
inline                  INLINE_FRAME
python                  NORMAL_FRAME
amd64 epilogue          NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2                  NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2 signal           SIGTRAMP_FRAME
amd64 sigtramp          SIGTRAMP_FRAME
amd64 prologue          NORMAL_FRAME
...

For a -g0 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables exec (without .debug_info but with
.eh_frame section), we'd like to start using the dwarf2 unwinder instead of
the "amd64 epilogue" unwinder, by returning true in
compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid for cust == nullptr.

But we'd run into the following problem for a -g0
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables (without .debug_info and .eh_frame section)
exec:
- the "amd64 epilogue" unwinder would not run
  (because compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid () == true)
- the dwarf2 unwinder would also not run
  (because there's no .eh_frame info).

Fix this by:
- renaming the "amd64 epilogue" unwinder to "amd64 epilogue override", and
- adding a fallback "amd64 epilogue" after the dwarf unwinders,
while making sure that only one of the two is active.  Likewise for i386.  NFC.

For amd64, this results in this change:
...
 $ gdb -q -batch -ex "set arch i386:x86-64" -ex "maint info frame-unwinders"
 The target architecture is set to "i386:x86-64".
 dummy                   DUMMY_FRAME
 dwarf2 tailcall         TAILCALL_FRAME
 inline                  INLINE_FRAME
 python                  NORMAL_FRAME
-amd64 epilogue          NORMAL_FRAME
+amd64 epilogue override NORMAL_FRAME
 dwarf2                  NORMAL_FRAME
 dwarf2 signal           SIGTRAMP_FRAME
+amd64 epilogue          NORMAL_FRAME
 amd64 sigtramp          SIGTRAMP_FRAME
 amd64 prologue          NORMAL_FRAME
...

And for i386:
...
 $ gdb -q -batch -ex "set arch i386" -ex "maint info frame-unwinders"
 The target architecture is set to "i386".
 dummy                   DUMMY_FRAME
 dwarf2 tailcall         TAILCALL_FRAME
 iline                  INLINE_FRAME
-i386 epilogue           NORMAL_FRAME
+i386 epilogue override  NORMAL_FRAME
 dwarf2                  NORMAL_FRAME
 dwarf2 signal           SIGTRAMP_FRAME
+i386 epilogue           NORMAL_FRAME
 i386 stack tramp        NORMAL_FRAME
 i386 sigtramp           SIGTRAMP_FRAME
 i386 prologue           NORMAL_FRAME
...
---
 gdb/amd64-tdep.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 gdb/i386-tdep.c  | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/amd64-tdep.c b/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
index 0ec9b23922d..c0c62bdd696 100644
--- a/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/amd64-tdep.c
@@ -2913,9 +2913,9 @@ amd64_stack_frame_destroyed_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
 }
 
 static int
-amd64_epilogue_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
-			      frame_info_ptr this_frame,
-			      void **this_prologue_cache)
+amd64_epilogue_frame_sniffer_1 (const struct frame_unwind *self,
+				frame_info_ptr this_frame,
+				void **this_prologue_cache, bool override_p)
 {
   struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
   CORE_ADDR pc = get_frame_pc (this_frame);
@@ -2924,14 +2924,45 @@ amd64_epilogue_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
     /* We're not in the inner frame, so assume we're not in an epilogue.  */
     return 0;
 
-  if (compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid (find_pc_compunit_symtab (pc)))
-    /* Don't override the symtab unwinders.  */
-    return 0;
+  bool unwind_valid_p
+    = compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid (find_pc_compunit_symtab (pc));
+  if (override_p)
+    {
+      if (unwind_valid_p)
+	/* Don't override the symtab unwinders, skip
+	   "amd64 epilogue override".  */
+	return 0;
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      if (!unwind_valid_p)
+	/* "amd64 epilogue override" unwinder already ran, skip
+	   "amd64 epilogue".  */
+	return 0;
+    }
 
   /* Check whether we're in an epilogue.  */
   return amd64_stack_frame_destroyed_p (gdbarch, pc);
 }
 
+static int
+amd64_epilogue_override_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
+				       frame_info_ptr this_frame,
+				       void **this_prologue_cache)
+{
+  return amd64_epilogue_frame_sniffer_1 (self, this_frame, this_prologue_cache,
+					 true);
+}
+
+static int
+amd64_epilogue_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
+			      frame_info_ptr this_frame,
+			      void **this_prologue_cache)
+{
+  return amd64_epilogue_frame_sniffer_1 (self, this_frame, this_prologue_cache,
+					 false);
+}
+
 static struct amd64_frame_cache *
 amd64_epilogue_frame_cache (frame_info_ptr this_frame, void **this_cache)
 {
@@ -3000,6 +3031,17 @@ amd64_epilogue_frame_this_id (frame_info_ptr this_frame,
     (*this_id) = frame_id_build (cache->base + 16, cache->pc);
 }
 
+static const struct frame_unwind amd64_epilogue_override_frame_unwind =
+{
+  "amd64 epilogue override",
+  NORMAL_FRAME,
+  amd64_epilogue_frame_unwind_stop_reason,
+  amd64_epilogue_frame_this_id,
+  amd64_frame_prev_register,
+  NULL,
+  amd64_epilogue_override_frame_sniffer
+};
+
 static const struct frame_unwind amd64_epilogue_frame_unwind =
 {
   "amd64 epilogue",
@@ -3257,7 +3299,9 @@ amd64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
   /* Hook the function epilogue frame unwinder.  This unwinder is
      appended to the list first, so that it supercedes the other
      unwinders in function epilogues.  */
-  frame_unwind_prepend_unwinder (gdbarch, &amd64_epilogue_frame_unwind);
+  frame_unwind_prepend_unwinder (gdbarch, &amd64_epilogue_override_frame_unwind);
+
+  frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &amd64_epilogue_frame_unwind);
 
   /* Hook the prologue-based frame unwinders.  */
   frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &amd64_sigtramp_frame_unwind);
diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
index 5e797d098e8..d765c1e95d7 100644
--- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
@@ -2229,9 +2229,9 @@ i386_stack_frame_destroyed_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
 }
 
 static int
-i386_epilogue_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
-			     frame_info_ptr this_frame,
-			     void **this_prologue_cache)
+i386_epilogue_frame_sniffer_1 (const struct frame_unwind *self,
+			       frame_info_ptr this_frame,
+			       void **this_prologue_cache, bool override_p)
 {
   struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
   CORE_ADDR pc = get_frame_pc (this_frame);
@@ -2240,14 +2240,45 @@ i386_epilogue_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
     /* We're not in the inner frame, so assume we're not in an epilogue.  */
     return 0;
 
-  if (compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid (find_pc_compunit_symtab (pc)))
-    /* Don't override the symtab unwinders.  */
-    return 0;
+  bool unwind_valid_p
+    = compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid (find_pc_compunit_symtab (pc));
+  if (override_p)
+    {
+      if (unwind_valid_p)
+	/* Don't override the symtab unwinders, skip
+	   "i386 epilogue override".  */
+	return 0;
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      if (!unwind_valid_p)
+	/* "i386 epilogue override" unwinder already ran, skip
+	   "i386 epilogue".  */
+	return 0;
+    }
 
   /* Check whether we're in an epilogue.  */
   return i386_stack_frame_destroyed_p (gdbarch, pc);
 }
 
+static int
+i386_epilogue_override_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
+				      frame_info_ptr this_frame,
+				      void **this_prologue_cache)
+{
+  return i386_epilogue_frame_sniffer_1 (self, this_frame, this_prologue_cache,
+					true);
+}
+
+static int
+i386_epilogue_frame_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
+			     frame_info_ptr this_frame,
+			     void **this_prologue_cache)
+{
+  return i386_epilogue_frame_sniffer_1 (self, this_frame, this_prologue_cache,
+					false);
+}
+
 static struct i386_frame_cache *
 i386_epilogue_frame_cache (frame_info_ptr this_frame, void **this_cache)
 {
@@ -2320,6 +2351,17 @@ i386_epilogue_frame_prev_register (frame_info_ptr this_frame,
   return i386_frame_prev_register (this_frame, this_cache, regnum);
 }
 
+static const struct frame_unwind i386_epilogue_override_frame_unwind =
+{
+  "i386 epilogue override",
+  NORMAL_FRAME,
+  i386_epilogue_frame_unwind_stop_reason,
+  i386_epilogue_frame_this_id,
+  i386_epilogue_frame_prev_register,
+  NULL,
+  i386_epilogue_override_frame_sniffer
+};
+
 static const struct frame_unwind i386_epilogue_frame_unwind =
 {
   "i386 epilogue",
@@ -8616,13 +8658,16 @@ i386_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
      unwinder in function epilogues (where the DWARF unwinder
      currently fails).  */
   if (info.bfd_arch_info->bits_per_word == 32)
-    frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &i386_epilogue_frame_unwind);
+    frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &i386_epilogue_override_frame_unwind);
 
   /* Hook in the DWARF CFI frame unwinder.  This unwinder is appended
      to the list before the prologue-based unwinders, so that DWARF
      CFI info will be used if it is available.  */
   dwarf2_append_unwinders (gdbarch);
 
+  if (info.bfd_arch_info->bits_per_word == 32)
+    frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &i386_epilogue_frame_unwind);
+
   frame_base_set_default (gdbarch, &i386_frame_base);
 
   /* Pseudo registers may be changed by amd64_init_abi.  */
-- 
2.35.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13 14:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] [gdb/symtab] Assume epilogue unwind info is valid unless gcc < 4.5.0 Tom de Vries
2023-02-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] [gdb/symtab] Factor out compunit_epilogue_unwind_valid Tom de Vries
2023-02-14 15:56   ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-14 22:36     ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-20 10:27       ` Tom de Vries
2023-02-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] [gdb/tdep] Fix amd64/i386_stack_frame_destroyed_p Tom de Vries
2023-02-13 14:23 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2023-02-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] [gdb/symtab] Trust epilogue unwind info for unknown producer (-g0 case) Tom de Vries
2023-02-13 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] [gdb/symtab] Trust epilogue unwind info for unknown or non-gcc producer Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230213142309.24366-4-tdevries@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).