public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lancelot SIX <lsix@lancelotsix.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] gdb/amdgpu: add precise-memory support
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:04:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230915160454.qoc3pjpl5fyxgz45@octopus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230915145249.22318-3-simon.marchi@efficios.com>

Hi Simon,

It looks like your latest change is not c++11 compliant (see below).

I do have a WIP branch to bump the C++ version to C++17
(users/lsix/try-c++17).  Maybe it's time I write proper commit messages
and send this as RFC, see if there is a concensis to allow c++17.

> diff --git a/gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c b/gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c
> index 22c269b7992c..507824decf8d 100644
> --- a/gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c
> +++ b/gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c
> @@ -116,8 +117,9 @@ get_amd_dbgapi_target_inferior_created_observer_token ()
>  
>  struct amd_dbgapi_inferior_info
>  {
> -  explicit amd_dbgapi_inferior_info (inferior *inf)
> -    : inf (inf)
> +  explicit amd_dbgapi_inferior_info (inferior *inf,
> +				     bool precise_memory_requested = false)
> +    : inf {inf}, precise_memory {precise_memory_requested}
>    {}

If I build using -std=c++11 I get the following error:

../../gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c: In constructor ‘amd_dbgapi_inferior_info::amd_dbgapi_inferior_info(inferior*, bool)’:
../../gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c:122:18: error: no matching function for call to ‘amd_dbgapi_inferior_info::<unnamed struct>::._anon_207(<brace-enclosed initializer list>)’
  122 |     : inf {inf}, precise_memory {precise_memory_requested}
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c:145:3: note: candidate: ‘amd_dbgapi_inferior_info::<unnamed struct>::<constructor>()’
  145 |   {
      |   ^

In c++17 mode, it works fine though…

Moving the initialization in the ctor's body would solve the issue

  explicit amd_dbgapi_inferior_info (inferior *inf,
                                     bool precise_memory_requested = false)
    : inf {inf}
  {
    precise_memory.requested = precise_memory_requested;
  }

The alternative would be to name
amd_dbgapi_inferior_info::precise_memory's type and give it a ctor.

Best,
Lancelot.

>  
>    /* Backlink to inferior.  */

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-15 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-15 14:52 [PATCH v3 1/3] gdb: add inferior_cloned observable Simon Marchi
2023-09-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] gdb/testsuite: add linux target check in allow_hipcc_tests Simon Marchi
2023-09-15 17:19   ` Lancelot SIX
2023-09-15 20:18     ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] gdb/amdgpu: add precise-memory support Simon Marchi
2023-09-15 16:04   ` Lancelot SIX [this message]
2023-09-15 16:29     ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-15 17:16       ` Lancelot SIX
2023-09-15 20:19         ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230915160454.qoc3pjpl5fyxgz45@octopus \
    --to=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).