public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/24] gdb: don't handle i386 k registers as pseudo registers
Date: Wed,  8 Nov 2023 00:00:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231108051222.1275306-2-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231108051222.1275306-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>

From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>

I think that i386 k registers are raw registers, and therefore shouldn't
be handled in the various functions handling pseudo registers.

What tipped me off is the code in i386_pseudo_register_read_into_value:

      else if (i386_k_regnum_p (gdbarch, regnum))
	{
	  regnum -= tdep->k0_regnum;

	  /* Extract (always little endian).  */
	  status = regcache->raw_read (tdep->k0_regnum + regnum, raw_buf);

We take regnum (the pseudo register number we want to read), subtract
k0_regnum, add k0_regnum, and pass the result to raw_read.  So we would
end up calling raw_read with the same regnum as the function received
which is supposedly a pseudo register number.

Other hints are:

 - The command `maint print raw-registers` shows the k registers.
 - Printing $k0 doesn't cause i386_pseudo_register_read_into_value to be
   called.
 - There's code in i387-tdep.c to save/restore the k registers.

Remove handling of the k registers from:

 - i386_pseudo_register_read_into_value
 - i386_pseudo_register_write
 - i386_ax_pseudo_register_collect

Change-Id: Ic97956ed59af6099fef6d36a0b61464172694562
---
 gdb/i386-tdep.c | 23 -----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
index 1ddca2410fdf..2759c1a558c5 100644
--- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
@@ -3464,17 +3464,6 @@ i386_pseudo_register_read_into_value (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
 	      memcpy (buf + size, &upper, size);
 	    }
 	}
-      else if (i386_k_regnum_p (gdbarch, regnum))
-	{
-	  regnum -= tdep->k0_regnum;
-
-	  /* Extract (always little endian).  */
-	  status = regcache->raw_read (tdep->k0_regnum + regnum, raw_buf);
-	  if (status != REG_VALID)
-	    result_value->mark_bytes_unavailable (0, 8);
-	  else
-	    memcpy (buf, raw_buf, 8);
-	}
       else if (i386_zmm_regnum_p (gdbarch, regnum))
 	{
 	  regnum -= tdep->zmm0_regnum;
@@ -3656,12 +3645,6 @@ i386_pseudo_register_write (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
 
 	  regcache->raw_write (I387_BND0R_REGNUM (tdep) + regnum, raw_buf);
 	}
-      else if (i386_k_regnum_p (gdbarch, regnum))
-	{
-	  regnum -= tdep->k0_regnum;
-
-	  regcache->raw_write (tdep->k0_regnum + regnum, buf);
-	}
       else if (i386_zmm_regnum_p (gdbarch, regnum))
 	{
 	  regnum -= tdep->zmm0_regnum;
@@ -3758,12 +3741,6 @@ i386_ax_pseudo_register_collect (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
       ax_reg_mask (ax, I387_BND0R_REGNUM (tdep) + regnum);
       return 0;
     }
-  else if (i386_k_regnum_p (gdbarch, regnum))
-    {
-      regnum -= tdep->k0_regnum;
-      ax_reg_mask (ax, tdep->k0_regnum + regnum);
-      return 0;
-    }
   else if (i386_zmm_regnum_p (gdbarch, regnum))
     {
       regnum -= tdep->zmm0_regnum;
-- 
2.42.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-08  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-08  5:00 [PATCH 00/24] Fix reading and writing pseudo registers in non-current frames Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-11-11 19:29   ` [PATCH 01/24] gdb: don't handle i386 k registers as pseudo registers John Baldwin
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 02/24] gdb: use reg_buffer_common throughout gdbsupport/common-regcache.h Simon Marchi
2023-11-11 19:42   ` John Baldwin
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 03/24] gdb: make store_integer take an array_view Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 04/24] gdb: simplify conditions in regcache::{read,write,raw_collect,raw_supply}_part Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 05/24] gdb: change regcache interface to use array_view Simon Marchi
2023-11-13 13:43   ` Andrew Burgess
2023-11-13 14:00     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-11-13 16:47       ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 06/24] gdb: fix bugs in {get,put}_frame_register_bytes Simon Marchi
2023-11-13 15:00   ` Andrew Burgess
2023-11-13 19:51     ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 07/24] gdb: make put_frame_register take an array_view Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 08/24] gdb: change value_of_register and value_of_register_lazy to take the next frame Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 09/24] gdb: remove frame_register Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 10/24] gdb: make put_frame_register take the next frame Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 11/24] gdb: make put_frame_register_bytes " Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 12/24] gdb: make get_frame_register_bytes " Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 13/24] gdb: add value::allocate_register Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 14/24] gdb: read pseudo register through frame Simon Marchi
2023-11-11 20:11   ` John Baldwin
2023-11-08  5:00 ` [PATCH 15/24] gdb: change parameter name in frame_unwind_register_unsigned declaration Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 16/24] gdb: rename gdbarch_pseudo_register_write to gdbarch_deprecated_pseudo_register_write Simon Marchi
2023-11-14 12:12   ` Andrew Burgess
2023-11-14 15:16     ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 17/24] gdb: add gdbarch_pseudo_register_write that takes a frame Simon Marchi
2023-11-14 12:20   ` Andrew Burgess
2023-11-14 15:20     ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 18/24] gdb: migrate i386 and amd64 to the new gdbarch_pseudo_register_write Simon Marchi
2023-11-11 20:16   ` John Baldwin
2023-11-13  2:59     ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 19/24] gdb: make aarch64_za_offsets_from_regnum return za_offsets Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 20/24] gdb: add missing raw register read in aarch64_sme_pseudo_register_write Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 21/24] gdb: migrate aarch64 to new gdbarch_pseudo_register_write Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 22/24] gdb: migrate arm to gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 23/24] gdb: migrate arm to new gdbarch_pseudo_register_write Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:01 ` [PATCH 24/24] gdb/testsuite: add tests for unwinding of pseudo registers Simon Marchi
2023-11-08  5:16 ` [PATCH 00/24] Fix reading and writing pseudo registers in non-current frames Simon Marchi
2023-11-09  3:05   ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-08 11:57 ` Luis Machado
2023-11-08 15:47   ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-08 17:08     ` Luis Machado
2023-11-08 19:34       ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-09 19:04         ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-13 13:10           ` Luis Machado
2023-11-13 15:08             ` Luis Machado
2023-11-11 20:26 ` John Baldwin
2023-11-13  3:03   ` Simon Marchi
2023-12-01 16:27 Simon Marchi
2023-12-01 16:27 ` [PATCH 01/24] gdb: don't handle i386 k registers as pseudo registers Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231108051222.1275306-2-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).