public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] gdb/doc: spring clean the Python unwinders documentation
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 17:24:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <834jqszl1c.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bad3bab1077f38d3f508e0cb4a071663e745b06.1678460067.git.aburgess@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches on Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:55:18 +0000)

> Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:55:18 +0000
> From: Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> The documentation for the Python Unwinders API could do with some
> improvement.  The 'Unwinder Skeleton Code' has an error: it says
> 'unwinders' when it should say 'unwinder' in one case.
> 
> Additionally, by placing the 'Unwinder Skeleton Code' before the
> section 'Registering an Unwinder' we have skipping including the
> registration line in the skeleton code.  But this is confusion for
> users (I think) as the skeleton code is almost complete, except for
> one missing line which the user has to figure out for themselves.  By
> reordering the sections, it is now obvious that the registration
> should be included in the skeleton code, and the example is therefore
> almost complete.
> 
> Additionally, in the example skeleton code the way in which the
> frame-id was being built (using the current stack point and program
> counter is (a) not correct, and (b) counter to what is laid out in the
> 'Unwinder Input' section when describing building a frame-id.
> 
> I've removed the incorrect code and replaced it with more generic
> comments indicating what needs to be done.  As the actual actions that
> need to be performed are both architecture specific, and dependent on
> the function being unwound, it's almost impossible to include more
> exact code here, but I think what I'm proposing is less misleading
> than what we had before.
> 
> I've also added more cross references.
> ---
>  gdb/doc/python.texi | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

Thanks.

>  @defun PendingFrame.create_unwind_info (frame_id)
>  Returns a new @code{gdb.UnwindInfo} instance identified by given
> -@var{frame_id}.  The argument is used to build @value{GDBN}'s frame ID
> -using one of functions provided by @value{GDBN}.  @var{frame_id}'s attributes
> -determine which function will be used, as follows:
> +@var{frame_id}.  The @var{frame_id} is used internally by @value{GDBN}
> +to identify the frames within the current thread's stack.  The
> +attributes of @var{frame_id} determine what type of frame ID is
> +created within @value{GDBN}:                        ^^^^^^^^

I think the "ID" part there should be dropped (you are talking about
creating frames, not IDs, right?).

> +Object files and program spaces can have unwinders registered with
> +them.  In addition, you can also register unwinders globally.
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Either "in addition" or "also", but not both.

> +same name.  An attempt to add an unwinder with an already existing
> +name raises an exception unless @var{replace} is @code{True}, in which
> +case the old unwinder is deleted and the new unwinder is registered in
> +its place.                                                          ^^
   ^^^^^^^^^
I believe "in its stead" is better English-wise.

> +@subheading Unwinder Precedence
> +
> +@value{GDBN} first calls the unwinders from all the object files in no
> +particular order, then the unwinders from the current program space,
> +then the globally registered unwinders, and finally the unwinders
> +builtin to @value{GDBN}.

This text is too short to justify a separate @subheading, IMO.

Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-10 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-10 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Improvements & Cleanup For Python Unwinder API Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 01/10] gdb/doc: spring clean the Python unwinders documentation Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:24   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-03-14  9:27     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-14 12:56       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-16 14:30         ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 02/10] gdb/python: make the gdb.unwinder.Unwinder class more robust Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:32   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-14 10:06     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-14 12:57       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-31  2:15   ` Simon Marchi
2023-04-03 10:02     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 03/10] gdb/python: remove unneeded nullptr check in frapy_block Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 04/10] gdb/python: add PENDING_FRAMEPY_REQUIRE_VALID macro in py-unwind.c Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 05/10] gdb/python: add some additional methods to gdb.PendingFrame Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:42   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-14 10:18     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-14 12:59       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-16 14:28         ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-16 14:46           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-16 17:26             ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-16 19:54               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 06/10] gdb/python: add __repr__ for PendingFrame and UnwindInfo Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] gdb/python: remove Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE from gdb.UnwindInfo Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 08/10] gdb: have value_as_address call unpack_pointer Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:28   ` Tom Tromey
2023-03-10 22:08     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 09/10] gdb/python: Allow gdb.UnwindInfo to be created with non gdb.Value args Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:34   ` Tom Tromey
2023-03-10 22:16     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-11 14:47       ` Tom Tromey
2023-03-10 15:38   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 10/10] gdb/python: Add new gdb.unwinder.FrameId class Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:36   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-14 10:58     ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-14 13:00       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-29 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/10] Improvements & Cleanup For Python Unwinder API Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=834jqszl1c.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).