From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] gdb/doc: spring clean the Python unwinders documentation
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 17:24:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <834jqszl1c.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bad3bab1077f38d3f508e0cb4a071663e745b06.1678460067.git.aburgess@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches on Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:55:18 +0000)
> Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 14:55:18 +0000
> From: Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> The documentation for the Python Unwinders API could do with some
> improvement. The 'Unwinder Skeleton Code' has an error: it says
> 'unwinders' when it should say 'unwinder' in one case.
>
> Additionally, by placing the 'Unwinder Skeleton Code' before the
> section 'Registering an Unwinder' we have skipping including the
> registration line in the skeleton code. But this is confusion for
> users (I think) as the skeleton code is almost complete, except for
> one missing line which the user has to figure out for themselves. By
> reordering the sections, it is now obvious that the registration
> should be included in the skeleton code, and the example is therefore
> almost complete.
>
> Additionally, in the example skeleton code the way in which the
> frame-id was being built (using the current stack point and program
> counter is (a) not correct, and (b) counter to what is laid out in the
> 'Unwinder Input' section when describing building a frame-id.
>
> I've removed the incorrect code and replaced it with more generic
> comments indicating what needs to be done. As the actual actions that
> need to be performed are both architecture specific, and dependent on
> the function being unwound, it's almost impossible to include more
> exact code here, but I think what I'm proposing is less misleading
> than what we had before.
>
> I've also added more cross references.
> ---
> gdb/doc/python.texi | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
Thanks.
> @defun PendingFrame.create_unwind_info (frame_id)
> Returns a new @code{gdb.UnwindInfo} instance identified by given
> -@var{frame_id}. The argument is used to build @value{GDBN}'s frame ID
> -using one of functions provided by @value{GDBN}. @var{frame_id}'s attributes
> -determine which function will be used, as follows:
> +@var{frame_id}. The @var{frame_id} is used internally by @value{GDBN}
> +to identify the frames within the current thread's stack. The
> +attributes of @var{frame_id} determine what type of frame ID is
> +created within @value{GDBN}: ^^^^^^^^
I think the "ID" part there should be dropped (you are talking about
creating frames, not IDs, right?).
> +Object files and program spaces can have unwinders registered with
> +them. In addition, you can also register unwinders globally.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Either "in addition" or "also", but not both.
> +same name. An attempt to add an unwinder with an already existing
> +name raises an exception unless @var{replace} is @code{True}, in which
> +case the old unwinder is deleted and the new unwinder is registered in
> +its place. ^^
^^^^^^^^^
I believe "in its stead" is better English-wise.
> +@subheading Unwinder Precedence
> +
> +@value{GDBN} first calls the unwinders from all the object files in no
> +particular order, then the unwinders from the current program space,
> +then the globally registered unwinders, and finally the unwinders
> +builtin to @value{GDBN}.
This text is too short to justify a separate @subheading, IMO.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-10 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Improvements & Cleanup For Python Unwinder API Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 01/10] gdb/doc: spring clean the Python unwinders documentation Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:24 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-03-14 9:27 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-14 12:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-16 14:30 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 02/10] gdb/python: make the gdb.unwinder.Unwinder class more robust Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-14 10:06 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-14 12:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-31 2:15 ` Simon Marchi
2023-04-03 10:02 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 03/10] gdb/python: remove unneeded nullptr check in frapy_block Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 04/10] gdb/python: add PENDING_FRAMEPY_REQUIRE_VALID macro in py-unwind.c Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 05/10] gdb/python: add some additional methods to gdb.PendingFrame Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-14 10:18 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-14 12:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-16 14:28 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-16 14:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-16 17:26 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-16 19:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 06/10] gdb/python: add __repr__ for PendingFrame and UnwindInfo Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] gdb/python: remove Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE from gdb.UnwindInfo Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 08/10] gdb: have value_as_address call unpack_pointer Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:28 ` Tom Tromey
2023-03-10 22:08 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 09/10] gdb/python: Allow gdb.UnwindInfo to be created with non gdb.Value args Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:34 ` Tom Tromey
2023-03-10 22:16 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-11 14:47 ` Tom Tromey
2023-03-10 15:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-10 14:55 ` [PATCH 10/10] gdb/python: Add new gdb.unwinder.FrameId class Andrew Burgess
2023-03-10 15:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-14 10:58 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-14 13:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-29 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/10] Improvements & Cleanup For Python Unwinder API Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=834jqszl1c.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).